Download pdf
Russell’s Theory of Descriptions and Strawson’s Critique of It
- 1 Peking University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper aims to explore the semantics within Russell’s theory of descriptions. Since the theory heavily relies on Frege’s semantics in various aspects, it is necessary to first examine Frege’s semantic framework, followed by an analysis of the aspects of Frege’s semantics that Russell accepts and those he rejects. Additionally, we investigate how Russell’s semantics functions within his theory of descriptions. Finally, we examine Strawson’s critique of the theory of descriptions based on the concept of usage. By analyzing the key points between the two, it becomes evident that Russell and Strawson hold differing views on language. However, this difference in linguistic perspectives fundamentally stems from their differing philosophical and truth views.
Keywords
meaning, semantics, theory of descriptions, referring, denoting, definite descriptions, Frege, Russell, Strawson
[1]. Russell, B. (1905). On denoting. Mind, 14(56), 479-493. Reprinted in Mind, 114, 480-493 (2005).
[2]. Russell, B. (1918). The philosophy of logical atomism. The Monist.
[3]. Tanesini, A. (2007). Philosophy of language A-Z. Edinburgh University Press.
[4]. Strawson, P. F. (1950). On referring. Mind, 59(235), 320-344.
[5]. Chapman, S., & Routledge, C. (Eds.). (2009). Key ideas in linguistics and the philosophy of language. Edinburgh University Press.
[6]. Martinich, A. P. (Ed.). (2006). The philosophy of language (5th ed.). Oxford University Press.
Cite this article
Huang,L. (2024). Russell’s Theory of Descriptions and Strawson’s Critique of It. Advances in Humanities Research,8,24-28.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title:
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).