Digital Feminism: The Role of Social Media in Shaping Feminist Movements in Asian Cultural Contexts

Research Article
Open access

Digital Feminism: The Role of Social Media in Shaping Feminist Movements in Asian Cultural Contexts

Huaijin Yin 1 , Qiongxian Zhang 2*
  • 1 Beijing City University, Beijing, China    
  • 2 Monash University, M.A.C., Monash, Australia    
  • *corresponding author
Published on 10 December 2024 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7080/2024.18291
AHR Vol.10
ISSN (Print): 2753-7099
ISSN (Online): 2753-7080

Abstract

Digital feminism is an innovative approach to gender equality, and social media has also served as a key tool in the growth of feminist voices and activism. In Asia, a region where patriarchy and cultural conventions have shaped social order to a considerable degree, social media has served as a fertile ground for advocacy and mobilisation. This essay examines how social media is used as both a form of empowerment and conflict, including advocacy on the web, the creation of online communities, and the culturalisation of feminist movements. But it also exposes broader barriers, such as online bullying, the digital divide and state censorship, that prevent digital feminism from developing and becoming more inclusive in Asia. Taking this perspective, the paper examines the activist use of digital technologies to advance feminist values in diverse and politically closed environments. This finding highlights the need for systemic solutions to close digital divides, defend online activists and create inclusive digital communities. It also contributes to the discussion of how technology, culture and feminism go hand in hand and what it means for social media-driven feminist movements in Asia to flourish or fail.

Keywords:

digital feminism, social media, Asia, gender equality, online activism

Yin,H.;Zhang,Q. (2024). Digital Feminism: The Role of Social Media in Shaping Feminist Movements in Asian Cultural Contexts. Advances in Humanities Research,10,38-42.
Export citation

1 Introduction

The digital revolution has radically transformed feminist activism, providing new opportunities for mobilisation and collaboration. Social media in Asia, which is diverse in culture, faith and class, has become an essential platform for breaking the patriarchy and fighting gender inequality. Twitter, Facebook and Weibo allow activists to bypass gatekeepers, making their voices heard, communicating with a global audience while tackling the local issues. Activists such as #MeToo and its regional variations demonstrate the radical potential of digital feminism to bring together communities and make systemic gender violence visible. But there is no easy way that social media can be used for feminist causes [1]. The digital divide, especially in rural and poor regions, prevents such platforms from reaching as many women as possible for online activism. Moreover, activists are often victimised online through harassment, cyber bullying and even state surveillance, which makes the environment unfriendly to their work. Even amid these barriers, digital feminist movements have remained resilient and flexible, using digital technologies to achieve gender equality in culturally appropriate ways. This article looks at the overlapping ways in which social media plays a part in the history of Asian feminist movements, by analysing how it can be used for advocacy, social formation and cultural adaptation. It also explores the stumbling blocks of online violence, accessibility and government censorship, and the tactics activists are using to overcome them. Through exploring these dynamics, this work aims to offer a detailed insight into the relationship between digital technologies, culture and feminism in Asia [2].

2 The Role of Social Media in Amplifying Feminist Voices

2.1 Online Platforms as Tools for Advocacy

Social media platforms radically altered the practice of feminist activism, providing us with never before available opportunities for education, support and action. They give feminist activists an efficient way to spread news quickly and reach both domestic and international audiences. Twitter, Facebook, Instagram and local platforms like Weibo and LINE are essential ways to bypass gatekeepers in Asian cultures where traditional media is patriarchal and can be highly censored. In the wake of such forums, activists have launched hashtag campaigns, most notably #MeToo and its Chinese-language counterpart #RiceBunny, to encourage survivors of gender-based violence to speak up. These narratives not only erased silences, but also opened conversations about systemic gender disparities at work, in schools, and at home. Social media campaigns have proven to be successful at shaping public perception and in driving legislative changes such as the expansion of anti-harassment laws in South Korea or introducing new workplace harassment laws in India. Beyond individual triumphs, platforms’ visual and multimedia features have helped to solidify feminist rhetoric with infographics, videos and live-streams that communicate deeply contentious issues [3]. But these campaigns affect Asia differently due to the digital footprint and cultural setting of those platforms. For example, in lower internet-access countries or regions with high gender inequality in digital access, such as rural India or Southeast Asia, social media may not be the most effective vehicle for advocacy. This emphasises the need for regional measures to unlock digital platforms for feminist activism.

2.2 Building Digital Communities

The development of digital communities has become one of the most powerful components of social media’s feminist impact. These communities offer digital platforms where people share and work on gender-equal issues, often across geographical and cultural divides [4]. Where in Asian societies it is still taboo to speak publicly about such hot topics as sexual harassment, reproductive health, domestic violence and gay rights, online communities offer an opportunity for discourse. Reddit, LINE and Facebook communities have made it possible to create space for underrepresented voices — especially women — to express themselves without fear of retribution. These online platforms are also known to promote solidarity, making participants realise they’re not the only ones in trouble and pushing one another forward. In conservative nations such as Malaysia and Pakistan, for example, feminist groups have used encrypted text messaging to establish help groups for abuse victims that include legal representation, counselling and support services. Further, such online communities have taken their influence out into the physical world through workshops, awareness events and protests, thereby interconnecting online activism with on-site activism. Feminist forums have been able to hold public demonstrations at large scale in South Korea, including the 2018 protests against illegal spy camera operations. Furthermore, these online communities help to keep feminist struggles afloat because they allow activists to continue to advocate even during times of political or social backlash [5]. The anonymity of these platforms is another crucial consideration, especially in jurisdictions where the public discussion of feminist views is fraught with the possibility of harsh social exclusion or legal punishment. But they too are under pressure, with issues including the lack of inclusivity for diverse socioeconomic and cultural populations, and increasing vulnerability to troll or state surveillance.

2.3 Cultural Adaptation and Resistance

Asia’s digital feminisms live in cross-cultural contexts that require quiet and attentive support. The Asian feminist movement is, unlike Western feminist movements, pressured to be conformist in ways that place a greater value on society as a whole (family, family structure, culture) than on individuals. This has spurred tactics that combine feminist goals with culturally appropriate symbolism and stories. In Japan, for instance, fights against workplace discrimination have used the metaphors of folkcrafts and poetry to celebrate women’s social role and advocate gender equality. In South Korea, too, feminists have drawn on Confucian concepts of respect and coexistence to garner more widespread popular support and abolish patriarchy. But these attempts to culturally redecorate feminist discourse are sharply resisted, by both individuals and institutions. Cyber bullying — which is endemic in Asia — is applied to female activists in targeted violence, doxxing, cyberbullying and threats of violence. Often, this abuse mirrors a broader social indifference to resistance to gender norms. Government surveillance and censorship, too, remain persistent hindrances, especially in China and Vietnam, where online feminist discourse is regularly observed and suppressed. Female bloggers and influencers within these environments have had their accounts blocked, posts removed and sometimes even arrested and questioned. That has sent activists clamouring for new ways to stay under the radar without affecting their targets – coded words, memes, even spoof messages. This cultural backlash is also frequently stoked by conservative voices that see feminism as a non-Asian Western export, so it is difficult to fight. Despite this, the resilience and ingenuity of Asian digital feminist movements demonstrate that even when there is a lot of resistance, it can nonetheless be a potent force to make things happen [6]. The combination of culturally informed discourse and novel online engagement reminds us of the need to adapt feminist sensibilities to socio-political realities of Asian populations.

3 Challenges and Limitations of Digital Feminism in Asia

3.1 Online Harassment and Digital Violence

Taboos and ensnared patriarchy make harassment and cyberbullying among the most pervasive and destructive problems of digital feminism in Asia today. Trolling, cyberstalking and doxxing are all ways in which feminist activists on the internet are targeted and their legitimacy discredited. These assaults are often non-reflexive, part of a coordinated effort to silence and persecute women who rebel against conventional wisdom. Harassment, sexual harassment and bulling are standard — part of a vitriolic internet climate that discourages many from talking about feminist topics. The anonymity afforded by the internet, particularly social media sites such as Twitter and Facebook, encourages hackers and shields them from accountability. This anonymity makes online violence even more severe in countries like India and the Philippines where social media is a hotbed of violence. The online home addresses and phone numbers of feminist and political leaders doxx them, endangering their lives and causing psychological harm. Such online violence does not just target individual activists; it casts a dark cloud over the feminist movement, leaving no room for anyone to become a part of or participate in it. The psychological toll of long-term harassment is devastating, and leads to stress, depression and, in some cases, abandonment of activism. Yet, even with such grave issues, many Asian nations lack robust legal protections against cyber attacks. Even some jurisdictions like Singapore have enacted cybercrime laws, but those laws are thin and the hackers escape prosecution. Internet harassment has no laws or laws at all, and in Pakistan and Indonesia the victims have little recourse. That can only be addressed with systematic interventions, including comprehensive legislation explicitly addressing online gender violence, more robust law enforcement, and public education campaigns that transform social attitudes towards online abuse. What we also need more of are social media platforms that are better, content moderation systems, reporting capabilities, and user protection. Third, internet abuse prevention is vital not only to the safety of individual activists, but to the survival and development of digital feminism in Asia.

3.2 Digital Divide and Accessibility

As deep disparities in tech and the internet continue to stand as a huge obstacle to the inclusiveness and impact of digital feminism in Asia, the digital divide remains a major barrier to digital feminism’s reach and inclusion. Though cities and wealthy societies are largely in the throes of the digital boom, women in rural and poor countries are often left behind. This difference is exacerbated in Indonesia, India and Bangladesh where poverty, gender norms and cultural biases hinder women’s access to digital resources. In most rural settings, the internet and digital devices are expensive enough that it is practically impossible for women to engage in virtual feminist struggles. Even with access to the internet, low digital literacy impedes many women from taking full advantage of social media platforms or making them work for advocacy. Thus, such women have limited access to resources to speak up, find support groups, or do activism. Such exclusion merely reinforces inequality, since only a small select group can fully exploit the possibilities of digital feminism.

In addition, the digital chasm also limits the diversity of voices found in online feminist movements. Rural and marginal women, often subject to particular problems arising from gender inequality, do not feature in mainstream feminist literature. Not only is their exclusion damaging to the movement, but they are not solving the unique problems of large swathes of society. Solving this gap involves collaborative effort from a variety of stakeholders. States would have to build infrastructure to expand the internet in remote communities and fund devices. Education programs specifically designed for digitally literate women also play a key role in making participation possible. Non-governmental organisations and popular movements can add a local dimension by holding training sessions at the grassroots level and producing local content that will appeal to rural audiences [7]. Collaborations between government, business and feminist groups could even be used to drive faster outcomes by delivering scalable and sustainable solutions. Stopping the digital chasm is crucial to making digital feminism an inclusive and radical movement that empowers women of all socioeconomic classes.

3.3 Censorship and State Surveillance

For digital feminism in Asia, where dictatorship or a state that has not freed itself is a giant challenge, the barriers to freedom of expression are enormous. China, Vietnam and Myanmar regimes regularly monitor the web, often repressing criticism and limiting access to websites in order to silence criticism. Facebook, Weibo and others are regularly forced to conform to the demands of the state, with feminist posts being deleted, accounts suspended and hashtags for gender equality censored. In China, for example, feminist activists on Weibo and WeChat have had their accounts suspended or their posts removed for writing about topics such as sexual harassment or reproductive rights. This type of institutionalized censorship can be seen in Table 1, which examines major censorship trends in selected Asian countries, comparing account bans, post deletions, and specific monitoring techniques. According to the numbers, China has the most sophisticated surveillance technology, from facial recognition to AI-powered surveillance, while nations such as Myanmar use internet closures to crush dissidents.

Table 1. Comparative Analysis of Censorship and Surveillance Practices in Select Asian Countries

Country

Primary Censorship Method

Surveillance Tools Used

Impact on Feminist Activism

China

Account bans, post deletions, hashtag censorship

Facial recognition, AI-driven monitoring

Significant suppression, limited visibility

Vietnam

Content removal, user account tracking

State-controlled monitoring systems

Fear among activists, reduced online activity

Myanmar

Internet shutdowns, social media bans

Network-level monitoring

Severe restriction of digital feminist efforts

India

Selective content blocking, user monitoring

Data tracking technologies

Mixed impact, localized censorship

South Korea

Limited censorship, targeted monitoring

Legal demands for platform compliance

Relatively supportive environment

State surveillance adds a further layer of complexity by using facial-recognition and data mining to track activists and deter dissent. Female activists who question the state or identify structural injustices are targeted, detained or jailed, a culture of fear which discourages many from online activism and severely constrains feminist action. In the face of these challenges, activists have devised creative ways to evade censorship and keep their activism going. These include encrypted communications, e-mails, pseudonyms, coded language and symbolic symbols, which allow activists to communicate without fear of being noticed. Decentralized platforms and blockchains are also viable options for retaining feminist materials and ensuring accessibility even within highly restricted digital spaces. Yet in most Asian countries, the power of the state remains a fundamental impediment to the growth of digital feminism. To counter these challenges we need global cooperation to defend digital rights and free speech. Organisations and governments globally must compel authoritarian governments to respect fundamental human rights and make room for feminist action. Also, privacy-based platforms that prioritise user safety and guard against spying are key to empowering activists. Networking within global feminist groups can also bring awareness to women’s experiences under repressive institutions, enabling them to speak up more strongly and ensure their work gets heard. Resolving censorship and surveillance barriers is critical to unlocking the potential of digital feminism as a social revolution in Asia.

3.4 Empowering Marginalized Voices

Digital feminist movements in Asia should also open their networks to voice minority voices (rural women, LGBTQ+, ethnic minorities, etc) who struggle with intersectional challenges [9]. These communities have become well-served by storytelling, and activists now use social media to transmit their own stories that reach out to mass audiences and illuminate systemic inequities. In Bangladesh and Nepal, small-scale campaigns address issues of reproductive health and gender violence in specific ways, which makes them feel believable and urgent. Through working with grassroots organizations and using culturally specific digital technologies, these methods have succeeded in connecting mainstream feminism with underserved communities. These efforts not only make feminist movements more inclusive but help to ensure that digital feminist movements are equally relevant and influential in a broad range of sociocultural contexts [10].

4 Conclusion

Digital feminism – fuelled by social media – has given new meaning to Asian feminist movements, both promising and challenging ways to combat gender inequity. Social media allowed activists to spread their message, create supportive communities and tailor feminist stories to local culture. Yet the digital divide, online bullying and censorship pose barriers to inclusivity and success. This research emphasizes the need for systemic solutions such as increased legal protections, infrastructure and advocacy among activists, policymakers and tech companies to help address these issues. The durability and ingenuity of digital feminist movements are a testimony to their power to bring real social transformation, despite cultural and political opposition. Changing those limitations will ensure that digital feminism continues to grow as an essential instrument of gender equality in Asia and beyond.

Authors’ Contributions

Huaijin Yin and Qiongxian Zhang have made equally significant contributions to the work and share equal responsibility and accountability for it.


References

[1]. Wang, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023). Why do some women hate feminists? Social media and the structural limitation of Chinese digital feminism. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 29(2), 226–247.

[2]. Caldeira, S. P. (2024). Exploring feminisms on Instagram: Reflections on the challenges and possibilities of incorporating digital methods strategies in feminist social media research. Journal of Digital Social Research, 6(1), 74–89.

[3]. Mehan, A. (2024). Digital feminist placemaking: The case of the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement. Urban Planning, 9.

[4]. Akaliyski, P. (2023). Distinct conceptions of freedom in East Asia and the Protestant West underpin unique pathways of societal development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(2), 173–194.

[5]. Njuki, J., et al. (2023). Meeting the challenge of gender inequality through gender transformative research: Lessons from research in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 44(2), 206–228.

[6]. Pinho-Gomes, A.-C., Peters, S. A. E., & Woodward, M. (2023). Gender equality related to gender differences in life expectancy across the globe: Gender equality and life expectancy. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(3), e0001214.

[7]. Kurasawa, F., Rondinelli, E., & Kilicaslan, G. (2023). Evidentiary activism in the digital age: On the rise of feminist struggles against gender-based online violence. In Women in the Digital World (pp. 201–221). Routledge.

[8]. Singha, S. (2024). Unveiling gender dynamics in digital capitalism: Navigating the path to social gender equality. In Digital Capitalism in the New Media Era (pp. 161–186). IGI Global.

[9]. Ourahmoune, N., & El Jurdi, H. (2024). The march for gender equality of Algerian women: The struggle for spatial and historical recognition. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(3), 1012–1030.

[10]. Wang, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023). Why do some women hate feminists? Social media and the structural limitation of Chinese digital feminism. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 29(2), 226–247.


Cite this article

Yin,H.;Zhang,Q. (2024). Digital Feminism: The Role of Social Media in Shaping Feminist Movements in Asian Cultural Contexts. Advances in Humanities Research,10,38-42.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Journal:Advances in Humanities Research

Volume number: Vol.10
ISSN:2753-7080(Print) / 2753-7099(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Wang, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023). Why do some women hate feminists? Social media and the structural limitation of Chinese digital feminism. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 29(2), 226–247.

[2]. Caldeira, S. P. (2024). Exploring feminisms on Instagram: Reflections on the challenges and possibilities of incorporating digital methods strategies in feminist social media research. Journal of Digital Social Research, 6(1), 74–89.

[3]. Mehan, A. (2024). Digital feminist placemaking: The case of the “Woman, Life, Freedom” movement. Urban Planning, 9.

[4]. Akaliyski, P. (2023). Distinct conceptions of freedom in East Asia and the Protestant West underpin unique pathways of societal development. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 54(2), 173–194.

[5]. Njuki, J., et al. (2023). Meeting the challenge of gender inequality through gender transformative research: Lessons from research in Africa, Asia, and Latin America. Canadian Journal of Development Studies/Revue canadienne d'études du développement, 44(2), 206–228.

[6]. Pinho-Gomes, A.-C., Peters, S. A. E., & Woodward, M. (2023). Gender equality related to gender differences in life expectancy across the globe: Gender equality and life expectancy. PLOS Global Public Health, 3(3), e0001214.

[7]. Kurasawa, F., Rondinelli, E., & Kilicaslan, G. (2023). Evidentiary activism in the digital age: On the rise of feminist struggles against gender-based online violence. In Women in the Digital World (pp. 201–221). Routledge.

[8]. Singha, S. (2024). Unveiling gender dynamics in digital capitalism: Navigating the path to social gender equality. In Digital Capitalism in the New Media Era (pp. 161–186). IGI Global.

[9]. Ourahmoune, N., & El Jurdi, H. (2024). The march for gender equality of Algerian women: The struggle for spatial and historical recognition. Gender, Work & Organization, 31(3), 1012–1030.

[10]. Wang, Y., & Jiang, C. (2023). Why do some women hate feminists? Social media and the structural limitation of Chinese digital feminism. Asian Journal of Women's Studies, 29(2), 226–247.