
Research on the benefits of Cultural Keystone Species conservation on enhancing local communities’ sense of place: the case of Guangzhou, China
- 1 College of Forestry and Landscape Architecture, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study investigates the potential for Cultural Keystone Species (CKS) historically nurtured by Guangzhou Traditional Central Axis to enhance Sense of Place in contemporary communities within its boundaries, addressing the ruptures caused by the city in the Lived and Materialized Layers of the people-place relationship. It is therefore hypothesized that reintroducing these species can enhance visitors' Sense of Place. The study focuses on three thematic CKS: Daily Life, Biodiversity Resources, and the Exchange of Goods and Knowledge. The social benefits of CKS implantation are examined in the form of structured interviews based on three Sense of Place sub-dimensions: Place Dependence, Emotional Attachment, and Place Identity. The results show that all three CKS categories significantly improve the overall Sense of Place, and different CKS types have different abilities in placemaking: culturally oriented species strengthen intangible connections through shared memories and practices, while biodiversity-focused species emphasize specific ecological functions. This study introduces a correlation analysis framework between CKS and Sense of Place, providing theoretical and practical support for the realization of ecological and cultural synergistic regeneration in the renewal of contemporary urban historical environments.
Keywords
Guangzhou Traditional Central Axis, biocultural conservation, Cultural Keystone Species, sense of place
[1]. Cuerrier, A., Turner, N. J., & Gomes, T. C. (2015). Cultural keystone places: conservation and restoration in cultural landscapes. Journal of Ethnobiology, 35(3), 427-448.
[2]. Dondina, O., Orioli, V., Chiatante, G., et al. (2020). Practical insights to select focal species and design priority areas for conservation. Ecological Indicators, 108, 105767.
[3]. Low, S. M. (1992). Symbolic ties that bind. Springer US.
[4]. Theodore, M. B., Paula, D., & Vicki, F. (2004). A review of the international code of botanical nomenclature with respect to its compatibility with phylogenetic classification. Taxon, 53(1), 159-161.
[5]. Williams, D. R., & Vaske, J. J. (2003). The measurement of place attachment: validity and generalizability of a psychometric approach. Forest Science.
Cite this article
Lai,J. (2025). Research on the benefits of Cultural Keystone Species conservation on enhancing local communities’ sense of place: the case of Guangzhou, China. Advances in Humanities Research,12(2),12-24.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal:Advances in Humanities Research
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).