Download pdf
Comparison study of the 1923 and 1947 constitutions of the Republic of China regarding democratic rights and freedoms
- 1 BeiJing Jiaotong University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The 1923 Constitution of the Republic of China, constrained by the warlord fragmentation, political turmoil, and legislative ideology of the time, adopted a legal restrictionist approach. It only symbolically enumerated the rights of the people, failing to effectively safeguard democracy and freedom. In contrast, the 1947 Constitution, drafted after the War of Resistance, absorbed modern constitutional concepts and attempted to build a substantive rights protection system. This Constitution not only detailed citizens’ rights to freedom, participation in politics, and social security but also improved the effectiveness of rights protection through mechanisms such as the separation of powers and judicial remedies, presenting more substantial democratic characteristics. However, despite its formal progress, the practical political environment and social conditions limited its implementation, and it became a mere formality after the Nationalist government retreated to Taiwan.
Keywords
People’s democracy, freedom, 1923 Constitution of the Republic of China, 1947 Constitution of the Republic of China
[1]. Liang, Q. (2015). The ten principles of national vitality. In Collected works of the Ice-drinking Studio (p. 385). Zhonghua Book Company.
[2]. Zhu, Y. (Ed.), Zhu, Y., Wang, Y., Zhao, X., Gao, H., Zhang, D., Li, Q., & Li, C. (2021). History of Chinese law (p. 338). China University of Political Science and Law Press.
[3]. Qin, Y. (Ed.). (1988). A brief history of modern China (pp. 432-433). Henan University Press.
[4]. Zhang, Z., & Li, X. (2011). Constitutional evolution and the constitutional changes of the Nanjing National Government. Theoretical Monthly, 11, 12-18.
[5]. Zhou, E. (n.d.). On Marshall’s statement on leaving China. In Selected works of Zhou Enlai (Vol. 1, pp. 264-265).
[6]. Chen, X. (2019). A history of modern Chinese constitutionalism (pp. 218, 364). Commercial Press.
[7]. Zheng, D. (2003). Reassessing the 1946 Constitution of the Republic of China. Historical Studies Monthly, 2, 45-53.
[8]. Zhang, X. (2023). From legal restrictivism and constitutional protectionism to the principle of legal reservation: A historical examination of constitutional limitations on fundamental rights. Zhejiang Social Sciences, 9, 118-127.
[9]. Meyer, O. (2002). German administrative law (Liu, F., Trans., p. 72). Commercial Press.
[10]. Henkin, L. (1997). The age of rights (Xin, C., Trans., p. 6). Knowledge Press.
[11]. Zou, T. (1946). Study on the constitutional draft. Dalian Dazhong Bookstore.
[12]. Sa, M. (2004). New theory on the constitution of the Republic of China. In W. Geng (Ed.), Constitutional interpretation and application (3rd ed., p. 84). Sanmin Bookstore.
[13]. Hou, Q., & Cao, K. (2005). The “bribed election constitution” and its value assessment. Journal of Chongqing Education College, 1.
Cite this article
Chen,J. (2025). Comparison study of the 1923 and 1947 constitutions of the Republic of China regarding democratic rights and freedoms. Advances in Social Behavior Research,15(1),82-87.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal：Advances in Social Behavior Research
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).