Download pdf
Leveraging ESG Reporting for Corporate Reputation: A Study on Supply Chain Transparency in Environmental Practices
- 1 Monash University, Melbourne, Australia
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This research focuses on the intersection between Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) reporting and corporate reputation, specifically in relation to supply chain transparency. ESG reporting has become an important aspect of corporate governance in an age of rising environmental and social consciousness. The research uses a qualitative method and case studies of companies across a wide range of industries, from Tesla to Walmart, Microsoft to Nestlé to DHL, to investigate the effect of open ESG policies on public confidence and brand perception. Results show a strong positive relationship between ESG transparency and corporate reputation – transparent companies have higher public trust and loyalty. But supply chain transparency remains a major obstacle due to lack of standardised ESG metrics and resistance from supply chain partners. This research also points to sectoral differences, with retail and logistics performing better than manufacturing and food & beverage because of easy supply chains and higher consumer demand. This research shows that robust ESG reporting is critical for reputation management and competitive advantage. It also stresses the need for industry-based tactics and the use of technologies like blockchain and IoT for visibility of the supply chain. These insights are helpful for organisations who are seeking to balance sustainability with business outcomes and stakeholder expectations.
Keywords
ESG reporting, company reputation, supply chain transparency, green policy, corporate social responsibility
[1]. Arvidsson, S., & Dumay, J. (2022). Corporate ESG reporting quantity, quality and performance: Where to now for environmental policy and practice?. Business strategy and the environment, 31(3), 1091-1110.
[2]. Darnall, N., Ji, H., Iwata, K., & Arimura, T. H. (2022). Do ESG reporting guidelines and verifications enhance firms' information disclosure?. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(5), 1214-1230.
[3]. Barangă, L. P., & Țanea, E. I. (2022). Introducing the ESG reporting–benefits and challenges. Journal of Financial Studies, 7(13), 174-181.
[4]. Sulkowski, A., & Jebe, R. (2022). Evolving ESG reporting governance, regime theory, and proactive law: Predictions and strategies. American Business Law Journal, 59(3), 449-503.
[5]. Abdul Rahman, R., & Alsayegh, M. F. (2021). Determinants of corporate environment, social and governance (ESG) reporting among Asian firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 14(4), 167.
[6]. Chopra, S. S., Senadheera, S. S., Dissanayake, P. D., Withana, P. A., Chib, R., Rhee, J. H., & Ok, Y. S. (2024). Navigating the Challenges of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) Reporting: The Path to Broader Sustainable Development. Sustainability, 16(2), 606.
[7]. Zyznarska-Dworczak, B. (2022). Financial and ESG reporting in times of uncertainty. The Theoretical Journal of Accounting, 46(4), 161-180.
[8]. Kimbrough, M. D., Wang, X., Wei, S., & Zhang, J. (2024). Does voluntary ESG reporting resolve disagreement among ESG rating agencies?. European Accounting Review, 33(1), 15-47.
[9]. Luo, L., & Tang, Q. (2023). The real effects of ESG reporting and GRI standards on carbon mitigation: International evidence. Business Strategy and the Environment, 32(6), 2985-3000.
[10]. Bamahros, H. M., Alquhaif, A., Qasem, A., Wan-Hussin, W. N., Thomran, M., Al-Duais, S. D., ... & Khojally, H. M. (2022). Corporate governance mechanisms and ESG reporting: Evidence from the Saudi Stock Market. Sustainability, 14(10), 6202.
Cite this article
Yu,Y. (2025). Leveraging ESG Reporting for Corporate Reputation: A Study on Supply Chain Transparency in Environmental Practices. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies,16,21-25.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal：Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).