Research Article
Open access
Published on 25 October 2023
Download pdf
Guo,S. (2023). Mechanisms of Consumer Purchase Intent Formation in the Context of Live Streaming E-commerce. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies,1,37-48.
Export citation

Mechanisms of Consumer Purchase Intent Formation in the Context of Live Streaming E-commerce

Songliang Guo *,1,
  • 1 Beijing University of Posts and Telecommunications

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2977-5701/1/2023004

Abstract

This paper investigates the factors influencing purchase intent in the context of live streaming e-commerce and the variations in their impact among consumers with different levels of digital literacy. By constructing a purchase intent model for live streaming e-commerce, we collected 248 valid survey responses through a questionnaire survey. We employed a structural equation modeling approach to verify the influence of five dimensions of perceived value on purchase intent in live streaming e-commerce and the moderating effect of digital literacy. The results indicate that consumers' perceived value significantly affects their purchase intent through their attitudes toward live streaming e-commerce. The order of the impact of perceived value dimensions on consumer attitudes is as follows: entertainment, supply chain perception, functionality, economy, and host characteristics. Notably, as consumers' digital literacy increases, they tend to focus more on the supply chain perception factor.

Keywords

live streaming e-commerce, purchase intent, perceived value, digital literacy

[1]. Ministry of Commerce of the People's Republic of China. Ministry of Commerce Holds Online Routine Press Conference. (2020, September 1). Retrieved from http://www.mofcom.gov.cn/article/i/jyjl/l/202009/20200902997759.shtml

[2]. Phoenix Technology. Tmall Double 11 Achieves a Transaction Volume of 498.2 Billion, Leading the Way, Followed Closely by JD.com with 271.5 Billion. (2020, November 12). Retrieved from https://tech.ifeng.com/c/81KnknAk0HG

[3]. Søndergaard, H. A., Grunert, K. G., & Scholderer, J. (2005). Consumer attitudes to enzymes in food production. Trends in Food Science & Technology, 16(10), 474.

[4]. Zeithaml, V. A., Berry, L. L., & Parasuraman, A. (1996). The behavioral consequences of service quality. Journal of Marketing, 60(2), 31-46.

[5]. Wood, C. M., & Scheer, L. K. (1996). Incorporating perceived risk into models of consumer deal assessment and purchase intent. ACR North American Advances, 1996.

[6]. Feng, J., Mu, W., & Fu, Z. (2006). A Review of Consumer Purchase Intentions. Modern Management Science, 2006(11), 7-9.

[7]. Guiltinan, J. P., Paul, G. W., & Madden, T. J. (1982). Marketing Management: Strategies and Programs. McGraw-Hill, New York.

[8]. Jiang, J., Chen, Z., & Ren, J. (2011). An Empirical Study on the Impact of Perceived Reputation on Purchase Intent in a C2C Environment. Soft Science, 2011, 25(6), 130-134.

[9]. Lu, X., & Lu, C. (2012). The Impact of E-commerce Transaction Costs on Purchase Decisions: A Survey of C2C E-commerce in Taiwan. Economic Management, 2012, 34(10), 148-156.

[10]. Xie, Y., Li, C., Gao, P., et al. (2019). The Influence and Mechanism of Social Presence in Live Marketing on Online Conformity: A Study from the Perspectives of Behavior and Neurophysiology. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6), 990-1004.

[11]. Everard, A., & Galletta, D. F. (2005). How Presentation Flaws Affect Perceived Site Quality, Trust, and Intention to Purchase from an Online Store. Journal of Management Information Systems, 22(3), 56-95.

[12]. Van der Heijden, H., Verhagen, T., & Creemers, M. (2003). Understanding Online Purchase Intentions: Contributions from Technology and Trust Perspectives. European Journal of Information Systems, 12(1), 41-48.

[13]. Tang, F. (2012). The Impact of Online Store Design on Consumer Purchase Intentions. Zhejiang University.

[14]. Kim, J., Fiore, A. M., & Lee, H. (2007). Influences of Online Store Perception, Shopping Enjoyment, and Shopping Involvement on Consumer Patronage Behavior towards an Online Retailer. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14(2), 95-107.

[15]. Diao, L., Wang, X., & Lu, X. (2010). The Relationship between B2C Website Usability and Online Consumer Purchase Intent. Journal of Guilin Electronic Science and Technology University, 30(1), 90-93.

[16]. Lin, T., & Qu, H. (2019). The Influence of Key Factors of Internet Celebrity Marketing on Consumer Purchase Intent for Clothing. Silk, 56(3), 54-62.

[17]. Chen, H., Zhang, Y., & Guo, W. (2020). The Influence of Internet Celebrity Traits on Fan Purchase Intent on Live Streaming Platforms. China Retail, 34(10), 28-37.

[18]. Meng, L., Liu, F., Chen, S., et al. (2020). Can I Arouse You? Mechanism of the Influence of Different Types of Internet Celebrity Information Source Characteristics on Consumer Purchase Intent: A Study from the Perspective of Grounded Theory. Nankai Business Review, 23(1), 131-143.

[19]. Liu, Z., Zhao, X., & Long, W. (2020). The Formation Mechanism of Consumer Purchase Intent for Internet Celebrity Live Streaming Sales: An Analysis Based on the Grounded Theory. China Retail, 34(8), 48-57.

[20]. Rintamäki, T., Kanto, A., & Kuusela, H. (2006). Decomposing the Value of Department Store Shopping into Utilitarian, Hedonic, and Social Dimensions: Evidence from Finland. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(1), 6-24.

[21]. Chandon, P., Wansink, B., & Laurent, G. (2000). A Benefit Congruency Framework of Sales Promotion Effectiveness. Journal of Marketing, 64(4), 65-81.

[22]. Mathieson, K., Peacock, E., & Chin, W. W. (2001). Extending the Technology Acceptance Model: The Influence of Perceived User Resources. DATA BASE for Advances in Information Systems, 32(3), 86-112.

[23]. Meng, Y., Luo, Z., & Liao, J. (2020). Perceived Value of Online Live Streaming Content and Customer Fit. China Retail, 34(9), 56-66.

[24]. Davis, F. D., & Bagozzi, R. P. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.

[25]. Wexler, J. (2001). Why Computer Users Accept New Systems. MIT Sloan Management Review, 42(3), 17.

[26]. Lee, H. H., Ann, M. F., & Kim, J. H. (2006). The Role of the Technology Acceptance Model in Explaining Effects of Image Interactivity Technology on Consumer Responses. International Journal of Retail & Distribution Management, 34(8), 621-644.

[27]. Moon, J., & Kim, Y. (2001). Extending the TAM for a World-Wide-Web Context. Information & Management, 38(4), 217-230.

[28]. Wang, J., Huang, Y., & Shen, Y. (2018). Research Status and Enlightenment of Digital Literacy. Digital Education, 4(01), 15-21.

[29]. Gilster, P. (1997). Digital Literacy. Wiley.

[30]. Ren, Y., Sui, X., & Liu, X. (2014). Research on the European Union's Digital Literacy Framework. Modern Distance Education Research, 2014(05), 3-12.

[31]. Fishbein, M., & Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Cite this article

Guo,S. (2023). Mechanisms of Consumer Purchase Intent Formation in the Context of Live Streaming E-commerce. Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies,1,37-48.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Journal:Journal of Applied Economics and Policy Studies

Volume number: Vol.1
ISSN:2977-5701(Print) / 2977-571X(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).