Download pdf
Teaching for Social Justice: How Educators Address Inequalities in STEM Education
- 1 Columbia University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Inequalities in STEM education remain a persistent issue, disproportionately affecting underrepresented groups, including women, minorities, and low-income students. This study aims to explore how educators address these inequalities through social justice frameworks in their teaching practices. Grounded in theories of culturally relevant pedagogy and critical pedagogy, the research investigates the role of teachers as key agents in promoting equity in STEM classrooms. A systematic literature review was conducted, drawing from case studies, academic articles, and policy reports, focusing on strategies that educators use to create more inclusive and supportive learning environments. The findings reveal that educators utilize a range of methods, such as differentiated instruction, inclusive curriculum design, and culturally responsive teaching, to address disparities in STEM education. However, significant challenges, including limited resources and inconsistent institutional support, hinder full implementation. This paper highlights the importance of teacher agency and the need for professional development programs that equip educators to better address social justice in STEM education. It contributes to existing literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of best practices while identifying gaps in research on long-term impacts and global applicability.
Keywords
STEM education inequalities, social justice pedagogy, culturally relevant teaching, differentiated instruction, inclusive curriculum, teacher agency in equity
[1]. Flores, G. M., Bañuelos, M., & Harris, P. R. (2023). Facilitating marginalized youths’ identification with STEM through everyday science talk: The critical role of parental caregivers. Science Education, 106(1), 57–87. https://doi.org/10.1002/sce.21688
[2]. Sanabria, T., Palmer, R. T., & Jenkins, D. (2020). Barriers to STEM completion among Black and Latinx students. International Journal of STEM Education.
[3]. Gillespie, A. (2021). What do the data say about the current state of K-12 STEM education in the US? Retrieved from https://beta.nsf.gov/science-matters/what-do-data-say-about-current-state-k-12-stem-education-us
[4]. Ladson-Billings, G. (1995). Toward a theory of culturally relevant pedagogy. American Educational Research Journal.
[5]. Stetsenko, A. (2022). Radical transformative agency: A framework for equity in education. Frontiers in Education, 7, 940684. https://doi.org/10.3389/feduc.2022.940684
[6]. Fortney, B., Morrison, D., Rodriguez, A. J., & Upadhyay, B. (2019). Equity in science teacher education: Toward an expanded definition. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 259–263.
[7]. Rodriguez, A. J., & Suriel, R. (2019). Expanding and enacting transformative meanings of equity, diversity, and social justice in science education. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 14, 265–281.
[8]. Chen, A., & Mensah, F. (2018). Preparing socially just science educators: From theory to practice. Journal of Teacher Education.
[9]. Li, Y., Wang, K., Xiao, Y., Froyd, J. E., & Nite, S. B. (2020). Research and trends in STEM education: A systematic analysis of publicly funded projects. International Journal of STEM Education, 17, 1–17. https://doi.org/10.1186/s40594-020-00213-8
[10]. Rodriguez, A. J., & Morrison, D. (2019). Expanding and enacting transformative meanings of equity, diversity, and social justice in science education. Cultural Studies in Science Education, 14, 265–281. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11422-019-09938-7
[11]. Fortney, B., Morrison, D., Rodriguez, A. J., & Upadhyay, B. (2019). Equity in science teacher education: Toward an expanded definition. Cultural Studies of Science Education, 14(2), 259–263.
[12]. Carnevale, A. P., Fasules, M. L., Quinn, M. C., & Campbell, K. P. (2018). STEM: Science, Technology, Engineering, and Mathematics. Center on Education and the Workforce, Georgetown University.
[13]. Gillespie, A. (2021). What do the data say about the current state of K-12 STEM education in the US? Retrieved from https://beta.nsf.gov/science-matters/what-do-data-say-about-current-state-k-12-stem-education-us
[14]. Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and new directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54–67.
[15]. Saldaña, J. (2016). The coding manual for qualitative researchers (2nd ed.). SAGE.
[16]. Tang, G., El Turkey, H., Cilli-Turner, E., Savic, M., Karakok, G., & Plaxco, D. (2017). Inquiry as an entry point to equity in the classroom. International Journal of Mathematics Education in Science and Technology, 48(S4), 135–145.
[17]. Steele, C. M. (1997). A threat in the air: How stereotypes shape intellectual identity and performance. American Psychologist, 52(6), 613–629.
[18]. Kearney, M., Oladejo, D. A., & Stahl, G. (2022). Social justice implications of digital STEM pedagogy in developing countries. Education and Information Technologies.
[19]. Leggon, C. B., & Gaines, M. S. (2020). STEM and social justice: Teaching and learning in diverse settings. SpringerLink.
[20]. Granberg, C., & Olsson, T. (2015). Enhancing student collaboration through digital STEM tools. Journal of Educational Technology.
[21]. Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
[22]. Theobald, E. J., Hill, M. J., Tran, E., & Agrawal, S. (2020). Active learning narrows achievement gaps for underrepresented students in undergraduate STEM. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 117(23), 6476–6483.
[23]. Boyi, A., & Makwana, S. (2022). Addressing social justice through equitable access to digital STEM education. Journal of Science and Education Policy.
[24]. Pearson, G., & Tsui, L. (2022). Inclusion in practice: A systematic review of diversity-focused STEM programming. International Journal of STEM Education.
[25]. Ferri, J., & White, R. (2024). Culturally relevant STEM: A pilot study in high school chemistry and world history. Educational Sciences, 14(2), 182–196.
[26]. Johnson, M. L., & Kier, M. W. (2022). Adapting digital technologies to promote culturally relevant education during COVID-19. Education Sciences, 12(48), 25–37.
[27]. Holland, N. (2022). Equity in STEM through culturally responsive pedagogy. The Physics Teacher, 60(6), 616–617.
[28]. Rodriguez, S., & Hughes, J. (2022). The role of differentiated instruction in addressing inequities in STEM. STEM Education Journal, 19(3), 109–124.
[29]. Freeman, T., & Gonzales, F. (2021). Digital pedagogy and STEM equity during the pandemic. STEM Education Research Quarterly, 58(2), 112–130.
[30]. Palmer, S., & Chen, Z. (2020). Institutional support for social justice-oriented teaching practices in STEM. Educational Policy Journal, 45(1), 98–120.
[31]. Weaver, L., & Powell, K. (2022). Digital tools for equity in STEM: Addressing the digital divide. Journal of STEM Education Policy, 47(4), 188–199.
[32]. Palmer, T., & Chen, J. (2022). Overcoming barriers to digital equity in STEM: Lessons from the pandemic. Technology and Learning, 39(2), 156–170.
[33]. Gonzales, F. R., & Hill, T. (2021). Challenges in implementing social justice in STEM education. Journal of Educational Equity, 30(1), 45–61.
[34]. Rabin, C., & Medin, D. (2021). Systemic barriers to equity in STEM: A case study of rural and urban districts. Journal of STEM Education Research, 22(4), 88–109.
[35]. Harding, M., & Brousseau, E. (2020). Professional development needs for culturally relevant teaching in STEM. Journal of Teaching and Learning, 16(3), 55–71.
Cite this article
Meng,X. (2024). Teaching for Social Justice: How Educators Address Inequalities in STEM Education. Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies,2,18-23.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal：Journal of Education and Educational Policy Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).