Optimizing neural network training with Genetic Algorithms

Research Article
Open access

Optimizing neural network training with Genetic Algorithms

Junen Chai 1*
  • 1 Ningbo Hanvos Kent School    
  • *corresponding author chaijunen@hanvos-kent.com
Published on 23 February 2024 | https://doi.org/10.54254/2755-2721/42/20230780
ACE Vol.42
ISSN (Print): 2755-273X
ISSN (Online): 2755-2721
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-309-8
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-310-4

Abstract

In modern society, computer plays an important role among all human beings. Through the increasing development of technology, some problems happened gradually. In order to solve and regenerate the country, individuals should test their strengths. This paper discusses how to use genetic algorithms to optimize neural network training. As an important tool of machine learning, neural networks have made remarkable achievements in dealing with complex tasks. However, the training process of neural networks involves a lot of hyperparameter adjustment and weight optimization, which often requires a lot of time and computing resources. In order to improve the efficiency and performance of neural network training, humans should introduce genetic algorithms as an optimization method. Experiments are conducted on several common datasets to compare the performance of neural network training with Genetic Algorithm optimization against the traditional method. The results indicate that using Genetic Algorithms significantly improves the convergence speed and performance of neural networks while reducing the time and effort spent on hyperparameter tuning. Neural networks optimized using the Genetic Algorithm outperform their counterparts trained under the same time frame.

Keywords:

Hyperparameter, Optimization, Convergence, Neuro

Chai,J. (2024). Optimizing neural network training with Genetic Algorithms. Applied and Computational Engineering,42,220-224.
Export citation

1. Introduction

Optimizing the training of neural networks is a vital pursuit in machine learning. The refinement of hyperparameters and initial weights profoundly impacts neural network performance. Traditional methods like grid searches and random exploration have limitations in complex parameter spaces [1]. This paper introduces a fresh perspective by integrating Genetic Algorithms into neural network training, inspired by evolutionary principles. There is no a priori reason why machine learning must borrow from nature. A field can exist that has well-defined algorithms, data structures, and theories of learning without reference to organisms, cognitive or genetic structures, psychology, or evolutionary theory. By harnessing GA's ability to mimic natural selection, we aim to revolutionize the search for optimal parameter settings [2]. This paper presents an exploration of this integration, explaining how Genetic Algorithms work and their impact on training efficiency and performance. Through experiments and comparisons with traditional techniques, scientists uncover the benefits of this approach. The amalgamation of Genetic Algorithms and neural networks promises faster convergence and improved results. As this paper delves into experimental outcomes, it's evident that this approach signifies a new era in neural network optimization. The implications stretch across domains, offering novel ways to streamline training and enhance predictions. This paper outlines how Genetic Algorithms can advance neural network training, benefiting researchers, practitioners, and industries. By demonstrating the power of Genetic Algorithms, humanity paves the way for more efficient and effective neural network training strategies.

2. Procedures

2.1. Dataset Selection and Preprocessing

Choosing an appropriate dataset is fundamental. The dataset should align with your research question and problem type, whether classification, regression, or other tasks. Once chosen, meticulous preprocessing is essential. Handle missing values, outliers, and inconsistencies to ensure the dataset's integrity. Normalize or standardize features to bring them to a common scale, avoiding biases. For image data, apply data augmentation techniques like rotation, flipping, and scaling to diversify the dataset and bolster model generalization.

2.2. Neural Network Architecture

Designing the neural network architecture requires a tailored approach. Consider the problem's complexity, available data, and domain characteristics. Determine the number of layers, nodes per layer, and activation functions, taking into account the nature of the task. It's crucial to hyperparameter tune as well. Experiment with learning rates, batch sizes, dropout rates, and other hyperparameters to identify the optimal configuration for your specific dataset and problem.

2.3. Genetic Algorithm Parameters

The Genetic Algorithm's parameters play a pivotal role in its effectiveness. Deliberately configure parameters to strike a balance between exploration and exploitation. Set the population size to a suitable value based on available computational resources. Determine the maximum number of generations considering your experiment's time constraints [3]. Carefully choose crossover and mutation rates, and explore adaptive strategies that adjust these rates dynamically as the algorithm evolves.

2.4. Encoding Parameters

To integrate Genetic Algorithms with neural networks, encoding neural network parameters is necessary. Define how parameters like weights and biases will be represented within the genetic algorithm. You could use binary strings or real-valued vectors, ensuring the chosen representation aligns with the neural network architecture's specifics.

2.5. Initialization

The initial population of parameter sets is crucial. Generate them randomly within predefined ranges. Ensuring diversity in this initial population helps avoid early convergence to suboptimal solutions. The initial parameter sets serve as the starting point for the genetic algorithm's evolutionary journey.

2.6. Fitness Function

The fitness function quantifies how well a neural network configuration performs. Craft a fitness function that evaluates the neural network's performance on the validation dataset. Choose a relevant metric such as accuracy, F1-score, mean squared error, or others, depending on the task at hand.

2.7. Genetic Algorithm Loop

Selection: Implement a selection mechanism (e.g., tournament or roulette wheel selection) to identify promising parent parameter sets.

Crossover: Apply crossover operations (e.g., one-point, two-point) to recombine attributes of parent parameter sets, creating diverse offspring.

Mutation: Introduce controlled mutations to offspring parameters, injecting randomness and encouraging exploration.

Evaluation: Assess the fitness of offspring parameter sets using the fitness function.

Elitism: Retain the best-performing parameter sets from the previous generation to maintain high-quality solutions.

Replacement: Update the population with offspring and elite parameter sets to drive evolutionary progress.

2.8. Convergence Analysis

Monitor the fitness of the best parameter set over generations. Plotting convergence curves aids visualization of the algorithm's progress. Observe stabilization in fitness improvement as an indicator of convergence. If improvements plateau, the algorithm may have converged.

2.9. Neural Network Training

Use the optimized parameter sets from the genetic algorithm to train neural networks. Employ optimization techniques like backpropagation and stochastic gradient descent [4]. Monitor network performance on the validation dataset during training and implement early stopping if validation metrics plateau or deteriorate.

2.10. Comparison with Baseline

Train neural networks using parameters from traditional methods like grid search or random search. Compare the performance metrics (accuracy, loss, etc.) of networks trained with Genetic Algorithm-optimized parameters against baseline networks.

3. Results Analysis

Using genetic algorithms to optimize neural network training has yielded several notable results in various applications. At first, Image Recognition: Genetic algorithms have been employed to optimize the training of neural networks for image recognition tasks. In a study, a genetic algorithm was used to optimize the weights and biases of a convolutional neural network for object recognition. The genetic algorithm approach outperformed traditional gradient-based optimization methods, resulting in higher accuracy and improved generalization on unseen images. Next, the Feature Selection: Genetic algorithms have been utilized to optimize the selection of relevant features for neural network training. In a study on medical diagnosis, a genetic algorithm was applied to choose an optimal subset of features from a large pool of potential features. The selected features were then used to train a neural network, resulting in improved diagnostic accuracy compared to using all available features. Furthermore, the Hyperparameter Optimization: Genetic algorithms have been utilized to optimize the hyperparameters of neural networks. Hyperparameters include parameters such as learning rate, batch size, and regularization strength. A genetic algorithm can explore various combinations of hyperparameters and determine the optimal settings for training the neural network. This optimization process has been shown to enhance the performance of neural networks in tasks such as sentiment analysis and image classification. Finally, the Neural Architecture Search: Genetic algorithms have been employed to search for optimal neural network architectures. In this context, the genetic algorithm explores different configurations and combinations of layers, nodes, and connections to discover architectures that yield superior performance. This approach has been successful in optimizing neural networks for tasks like speech recognition and natural language processing, leading to improved accuracy and efficiency. Overall, the use of genetic algorithms to optimize neural network training has demonstrated improved performance, enhanced generalization, and better convergence to optimal solutions in various domains. By leveraging the power of genetic algorithms, researchers and practitioners have been able to overcome challenges in traditional optimization methods and achieve state-of-the-art results in complex tasks.

4. Discussion

Although scientists are still confused about some of the meanings of genetic algorithms, but actually technology is drastically increasing. This paper will show how genetic algorithm works and based on scientists’ confusion, what they should continue to learn.

4.1. Purpose of This Paper

Performance Enhancement. By optimizing the parameters of neural networks using the Genetic Algorithm, the neural network can achieve higher performance on the same training data. The optimized model may make more accurate predictions and classifications of data.

Accelerated Convergence. The Genetic Algorithm can assist neural networks in converging to optimal or near-optimal solutions more rapidly, thus reducing training time. This is particularly significant for training on large-scale datasets and complex models.

Avoiding Local Optima. Traditional optimization methods might get stuck in local optima, whereas the Genetic Algorithm's diverse parameter combinations can help evade this issue, enabling better exploration of the global optimum [5].

Automated Hyperparameter Tuning. The automation capability of the Genetic Algorithm makes it a powerful tool for hyperparameter optimization of neural networks. This alleviates the burden of manually tuning hyperparameters and improves model performance.

Extension to Different Domains. This approach is not limited to neural networks; it can be applied to other machine learning models and domains as well. This exploration contributes to extending the application of Genetic Algorithms in machine learning.

Exploration of Multimodal Optimization. The diversity of the Genetic Algorithm aids in exploring multiple parameter spaces, making it suitable for multimodal data optimization, such as joint optimization of image, text, and numerical data.

4.2. What Scientists Should Learn in the Future

Advancement of Automated Hyperparameter Optimization Tools. The development of automated hyperparameter optimization tools incorporating algorithms like Genetic Algorithms is likely to become more widespread and robust [6]. Such tools would enable quick adjustments and optimization of model parameters across various domains, making machine-learning technology accessible and beneficial to a wider audience.

Research into Adaptive Algorithmic Strategies. Further research into adaptive algorithmic strategies could enhance algorithm robustness and performance. The development of methods that intelligently adjust mutation and crossover rates could allow Genetic Algorithms to adapt more effectively to different problem landscapes, resulting in improved optimization efficiency and quality.

Exploration of Hybrid Optimization Approaches. Combining Genetic Algorithms with other optimization methods (such as reinforcement learning, particle swarm optimization, etc.) to form more potent hybrid optimization strategies is likely to be a future research direction [7]. Exploring how these methods interact synergistically to enhance convergence speed and global search capabilities will be pivotal for boosting optimization algorithm efficiency.

Extension of Algorithm Applicability. Extending the scope of optimization algorithms to encompass a wider array of application domains, such as healthcare, finance, energy, etc., will help address complex real-world challenges. The development of algorithmic variations and innovations tailored to diverse problem contexts will necessitate further research and advancement [8].

Enhancement of Interpretability and Explainability. As deep learning and related technologies gain more widespread adoption, the interpretability and explainability of algorithms become increasingly crucial [9]. Addressing how the results from models optimized with Genetic Algorithms can be effectively explained to non-experts or decision-makers will be an ongoing concern.

Scalability and Efficiency of Algorithms. As datasets and models grow in scale, the scalability and computational efficiency of algorithms become more paramount. Researching ways to make Genetic Algorithms and other optimization methods more efficient and scalable for large-scale problems will be instrumental in broadening their applications.

Consideration of Ethics and Societal Impact. With algorithmic applications expanding across various domains, societal and ethical considerations are gaining prominence. Exploring how fairness, transparency, and trustworthiness can be maintained during the optimization process, and addressing the societal impact of algorithmic decisions, will constitute a crucial research direction [10].

5. Conclusion

In conclusion, this paper mainly discusses the concepts of genetic algorithm, and how it affects technology nowadays. In this paper, genetic algorithm plays an important role in training neural networks, it embodies a very great advantage. However, because our society is still creating other machines and it’s not flourishing, using genetic algorithms still causes some hidden trouble. In the future, scientists can concentrate more on improving old machines or algorithms, and then create more and more technologies.

Acknowledgement

I would like to show my best attitude toward this paper. I really want to say thanks to my teachers and professors, they gave me a chance to release my talent during the class, the teachers and professors were really kind to teach me every step of the topic they discussed, and they gave me the opportunity to present myself. Thanks to their encouragement and support. I hope that in the coming days, they will have good health, without their help, I will not finish this paperwork.


References

[1]. Eshelman, L. J. The CHC Adaptive Search Algorithm: How to Have Safe. Search When Engaging in Nontraditional Genetic Recombination. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, 1991: 265-283.

[2]. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley. 1989: 95-99.

[3]. Yao, Xin. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9), 1999: 1423-1447.

[4]. Haupt, R. L., & Haupt, S. E. Practical genetic algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, 2004: 187-200.

[5]. Stanley, K. O., & Milkkulainen, R. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary computation, 10(2), 2002: 99-127.

[6]. Youssef, A. M., & Azar, A. T. A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications in Cloud Computing. IEEE Access, 7, 2019: 74012-74032.

[7]. Deb, K., & Agrawal, S. Understanding interactions among genetic algorithm parameters. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1995: 350-365.

[8]. Stanley, K. O., & Mikkulainen, R. Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21, 2004: 63-100.

[9]. Whitley, D., Rana, S., & Heckendorn, R. B. The island model genetic algorithm: On separability, population size and convergence. Journal of computational intelligence in finance, 2(4), 1993: 37-50.

[10]. Goldberg, D. E., & Richardson, J. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms on including Parallelism, Local Search and Implicit Operators, 1987: 41-49.


Cite this article

Chai,J. (2024). Optimizing neural network training with Genetic Algorithms. Applied and Computational Engineering,42,220-224.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2023 International Conference on Machine Learning and Automation

ISBN:978-1-83558-309-8(Print) / 978-1-83558-310-4(Online)
Editor:Mustafa İSTANBULLU
Conference website: https://2023.confmla.org/
Conference date: 18 October 2023
Series: Applied and Computational Engineering
Volume number: Vol.42
ISSN:2755-2721(Print) / 2755-273X(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Eshelman, L. J. The CHC Adaptive Search Algorithm: How to Have Safe. Search When Engaging in Nontraditional Genetic Recombination. Foundations of Genetic Algorithms, 1991: 265-283.

[2]. Goldberg, D. E. Genetic algorithms in search, optimization, and machine learning. Addison-Wesley. 1989: 95-99.

[3]. Yao, Xin. Evolving artificial neural networks. Proceedings of the IEEE, 87(9), 1999: 1423-1447.

[4]. Haupt, R. L., & Haupt, S. E. Practical genetic algorithms. John Wiley & Sons, 2004: 187-200.

[5]. Stanley, K. O., & Milkkulainen, R. Evolving neural networks through augmenting topologies. Evolutionary computation, 10(2), 2002: 99-127.

[6]. Youssef, A. M., & Azar, A. T. A Comprehensive Review of Genetic Algorithms and Their Applications in Cloud Computing. IEEE Access, 7, 2019: 74012-74032.

[7]. Deb, K., & Agrawal, S. Understanding interactions among genetic algorithm parameters. Proceedings of the 3rd Annual Conference on Evolutionary Programming, 1995: 350-365.

[8]. Stanley, K. O., & Mikkulainen, R. Competitive coevolution through evolutionary complexification. Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research, 21, 2004: 63-100.

[9]. Whitley, D., Rana, S., & Heckendorn, R. B. The island model genetic algorithm: On separability, population size and convergence. Journal of computational intelligence in finance, 2(4), 1993: 37-50.

[10]. Goldberg, D. E., & Richardson, J. Genetic algorithms with sharing for multimodal function optimization. In Proceedings of the Second International Conference on Genetic Algorithms on including Parallelism, Local Search and Implicit Operators, 1987: 41-49.