1. Introduction
Addressing climate change and achieving the “dual carbon” goals have become a global consensus, with low-carbon energy transition serving as the key pathway. The electrification of transportation is accelerating, where electric vehicles (EVs) as substitutes for conventional fuel vehicles are significantly reducing direct carbon emissions in the transport sector. Research indicates that EVs could reduce CO2 emissions by 28% by 2030 [1]. However, uncoordinated charging behavior may coincide with traditional peak electricity demand, threatening grid stability and potentially increasing carbon emissions from the power system. Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) technology transforms EVs into distributed mobile energy storage units, enabling bidirectional interaction with the grid. Studies show that aggregated V2G virtual power plants already outperform some traditional frequency regulation solutions in terms of response speed and flexibility [2]. Under demand response (DR) mechanisms, V2G can schedule EVs to charge during off-peak periods and discharge during peak hours, providing load balancing, peak shaving, and renewable energy fluctuation mitigation—demonstrating significant carbon reduction potential [3]. This paper reviews V2G-based carbon reduction technologies across three dimensions: (1) macro-level system planning and benefit assessment, (2) operational-level cluster optimization and control, and (3) micro-level incentive mechanisms and user behavior analysis. It aims to provide policymakers, grid operators, and researchers with a technical overview and research references to advance V2G’s role in achieving the “dual carbon” goals.
2. Analysis of carbon emission reduction technologies in Vehicle-to-Grid (V2G) systems
2.1. V2G system planning and benefit assessment
In the transition of V2G technology from concept to large-scale application, macroscopic system planning and benefit assessment are paramount. These foundational steps critically determine both the technical feasibility and strategic positioning within future energy ecosystems. Recent studies have systematically demonstrated the macroscopic value of V2G by examining its comprehensive impact on the power grid, the coordinated planning of infrastructure, and its deep integration with various energy systems.
2.1.1. Impacts and benefits of V2G as a DR resource
In response to policy mandates, enterprises have developed two types of demand response programs: incentive-based (where users receive compensation for reducing peak consumption [4]) and price-based (which guide autonomous load adjustment through time-of-use pricing [5]). The large-scale grid-connected operation of V2G presents both opportunities and challenges for the power system. Although disorderly access can exacerbate peak-valley differences, causing problems such as voltage limit violations, increased network losses, and harmonic effects, it poses a significant threat to grid safety [6-8]. Howerver, if an orderly charging and discharging management plan based on demand response can be developed, V2G can be transformed into a high-quality resource to alleviate power grid pressure and enhance stability. Existing research has shown that under the demand response mechanism, V2G technology can not enables grid load balancing through peak reduction and off-peak energy absorption, but also provide high-value auxiliary services such as frequency regulation and backup, while improving the overall operational efficiency and reliability of the power grid [9,10], giving the system additional flexibility [11]. In addition, the implementation of V2G can significantly enhance the ability of the power grid to absorb renewable energy - charging during peak periods of wind and solar power generation, discharging to support the power grid when renewable energy output is insufficient, effectively stabilizing the intermittency of renewable energy, which has become one of its most important carbon reduction benefits [12].
2.1.2. Coordinated infrastructure planning
The large-scale application of V2G depends on supporting infrastructure. Traditional planning models that separate vehicle and charger deployment are inadequate for V2G requirements. Consequently, the coordinated planning of V2G charging/discharging stations and Active Distribution Networks (ADNs) has become a research focus. Wang et al. proposed a distribution network expansion planning model that considers multiple energy resources, including shared V2G charging stations, solar-based distributed generation, and battery energy storage systems [13]. Liu et al. developed a coordinated planning model for ADNs and V2G charging stations using a Mixed-Integer Linear Programming (MILP) approach, which accounted for the distinct V2G charging load characteristics in residential, commercial, and office areas. Tests on the IEEE 33-bus distribution system demonstrated that coordinated planning effectively reduces total system costs [14].
2.1.3. Deep integration with multi-energy systems
In the context of developing a new-type power system dominated by renewable energy, V2G serves not only as a grid regulatory resource but also as a crucial component of integrated energy systems. Li et al. incorporated the power network into cross-regional hydrogen supply chain planning due to its advantages in long-distance, economical energy transmission [15]. Tao et al. established a coordinated planning model for electricity and transportation systems, achieving emission reductions in both systems through the use of hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. Other studies have focused on strengthening the role of DR in modern energy system planning [16]. Mansourlakouraj et al. developed a risk-aware voltage/VAR support model based on reinforcement learning for unbalanced distribution networks incorporating DR and conservation voltage reduction strategies [17]. Azimian determined the optimal DR response intensity for a multi-energy microgrid by regulating peak load to balance energy conservation and economic benefits [18]. Luo et al. considered the DR flexibility of transport hubs in their coordinated planning model [19], while Efstratiadi constructed a holistic energy management system integrating DR, PV generation, and energy storage [20]. Ali et al. explored the synergistic optimization of V2G with hydrogen energy systems and DR to maximize the hosting capacity for renewable energy. Their research found that combining the flexibility of EVs with the long-duration storage advantages of hydrogen can significantly enhance the resilience and economic efficiency of the entire energy system, offering a new pathway for deep decarbonization [21]. Such DR-based, cross-carrier energy planning extends the value of V2G from the power system alone to the broader energy internet.
2.2. Optimized dispatch of V2G clusters
Following macroscopic planning, the subsequent core task is to translate the theoretical potential of V2G clusters into tangible grid services through refined optimization, dispatch, and control. This is a critical step for the practical implementation of V2G technology. Research in this area focuses on developing algorithms that can execute DR instructions in a real-time, efficient, and intelligent manner to manage the uncertainty of EV behavior while satisfying multiple grid operational constraints and achieving objectives such as peak shaving, valley filling, and low-carbon economic operation.
2.2.1. Price-based demand response and optimal dispatch
Price-based demand response primarily guides user behavior through time-of-use pricing. Researchers employ genetic algorithms and other intelligent methods to optimize charging/discharging strategies for EV fleets, aiming to minimize load variance and reduce peak-valley differences. Fatih et al. achieved peak shaving in distribution grids via plug-in EV management [22]. Mahmud developed practical peak-shaving strategies combining home storage, V2G-capable EVs and PV systems [23]. Attou et al. effectively managed peak loads in grid-connected microgrids with PV and V2G stations using decision tree algorithms [24]. Majed et al. demonstrated that algorithm-optimized bidirectional charging significantly reduces load fluctuations compared to unidirectional charging [25]. These studies confirm price signals effectively guide EV fleets to charge during off-peak and discharge during peak periods, smoothing grid loads. Bin et al. further enhanced this approach by incorporating tiered carbon pricing into dispatch models, enabling simultaneous response to electricity and carbon prices for combined economic and low-carbon benefits [26].
2.2.2. Incentive-based demand response and advanced control
Incentive-based DR is typically used to provide high-demand ancillary services, such as frequency regulation, where the grid issues direct control commands and provides corresponding compensation. Alfaveh et al. used deep reinforcement learning (DRL) to solve the control optimization problem of V2G in power grid frequency regulation. This strategy utilizes a Deep Deterministic Policy Gradient (DDPG) agent to make rapid, continuous, and precise charging/discharging decisions based on real-time grid frequency signals. Its model-free nature enables it to adapt well to dynamic changes in the power grid environment, thereby achieving excellent performance and redundancy [27]. The application of such advanced control algorithms enables V2G to participate in more advanced DR programs with faster response requirements.
2.2.3. Reliability and uncertainty handling in demand response
The reliability of demand response is a primary concern for grid operators. The availability of EVs, user travel needs, and charging durations are all subject to high uncertainty, posing challenges to reliable response. To address these uncertainties, researchers have introduced methods such as robust optimization and stochastic optimization. Ren et al. developed a distributed robust optimization (DRO) dispatch scheme based on moment information. This scheme can make optimal decisions under worst-case scenarios without complete knowledge of the probability distribution of random demand, ensuring the economic viability and reliability of charging stations in uncertain environments [28]. Shokouhmand employed stochastic optimization methods to schedule EV charging/discharging patterns to enhance the flexibility and efficiency of microgrids [29].
2.3. V2G user-side incentives and market design
Technical feasibility and economic incentives are the core drivers for the large-scale development of V2G. Even with the most advanced dispatch technologies, V2G will struggle to move from demonstration to widespread adoption without effective market mechanisms and a deep understanding of user behavior. Therefore, designing effective market mechanisms and incentive measures, accurately understanding user psychology and behavioral patterns, and establishing a fair benefit distribution system are key to transitioning demand response from a technically feasible concept to a commercially successful reality.
2.3.1. V2G demand response pricing based on market games
The V2G market constitutes a complex ecosystem involving multiple stakeholders (grid operators, aggregators, and end-users), making game theory particularly suitable for pricing mechanism analysis. Chen et al. constructed a Stackelberg game model between an aggregator and EV users. In this model, the aggregator first announces a V2G price, users then decide whether and how to respond based on their own benefits, and the aggregator adjusts the price based on user responses until an equilibrium is reached. This model can identify an optimal V2G price that balances the interests of all parties [30]. Ma et al. innovatively applied cooperative game theory within industrial and commercial enterprises. By optimizing the V2G compensation price offered by a company to its employees' EVs, they achieved a "win-win" situation of reducing the company's electricity costs while increasing employees' income, providing a model for V2G business design in specific scenarios [31]. For emergency demand response, Wang et al. developed a deadline-aware online auction mechanism to efficiently aggregate V2G resources through dynamic bidding [32].
2.3.2. Data-driven modeling of user demand response behavior
To design attractive incentive mechanisms, it is essential to deeply understand user decision-making behavior. Modern research is shifting from traditional macroscopic statistical models to fine-grained, individualized modeling based on big data. Zhang et al [33]. utilized massive vehicle GPS trajectory data combined with a dynamic energy consumption model to accurately reconstruct users' complete travel chains and real-time state-of-charge (SOC) variations. More importantly, they introduced Prospect Theory from behavioral economics to build a V2G participation decision model. This model not only quantifies objective factors like economic returns and battery degradation but also incorporates subjective psychological factors such as users' risk preferences, loss aversion, social status, and environmental awareness. This allows for a more realistic prediction of user response probabilities when faced with different V2G incentive schemes. Such data-driven, in-depth behavioral modeling enables the creation of "user profiles" and the design of personalized, precise demand response incentives.
3. Conclusion
This paper has systematically reviewed the research on demand response-based guidance technologies for large-scale V2G integration aimed at carbon reduction. The analysis reveals that fully realizing V2G’s decarbonization potential requires a multi-level coordinated framework integrating macro-scale system planning, operational-level intelligent dispatch, and user-centric incentive mechanisms. These three interconnected levels are crucial for advancing V2G technology from theory to practice.
However, the large-scale application of V2G still faces challenges. Future research should prioritize several key areas: first, developing more accurate battery health assessment models and integrating them into dispatch and pricing strategies; second, leveraging artificial intelligence and other technologies to deepen the understanding and prediction of user behavior while protecting user privacy; and third, accelerating the unification of relevant technical standards and business models, and strengthening the linkage of V2G with electricity and carbon markets.
In summary, through synergistic innovation at the technological, market, and policy levels, V2G technology is poised to evolve from a grid regulation tool into a key enabler for achieving "dual carbon" goals and building a clean, efficient, and integrated energy-transportation system.
References
[1]. Unterluggauer, T., Rich, J., Andersen, P. B., & Hashemi, S. (2022). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning for integrated transportation and power distribution networks: A review. eTransportation, 100163.
[2]. Al-Awami, A. T., & Sortomme, E. (2011). Coordinating vehicle-to-grid services with energy trading. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(1), 453–462.
[3]. Takagi, M., Iwafune, Y., Yamaji, K., et al. (2012). Electricity pricing for PHEV bottom charge in daily load curve based on variation method. In: 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), pp. 1–6.
[4]. Jordehi, A. R. (2019). Optimisation of demand response in electric power systems, a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 308–319.
[5]. Paterakis, N. G., Erdinç, O., & Catalão, J. P. (2017). An overview of demand response: key-elements and international experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 871–891.
[6]. Mastoi, M. S., Zhuang, S., Munir, H. M., et al. (2023). A study of charging-dispatch strategies and vehicle-to-grid technologies for electric vehicles in distribution networks. Energy Reports, 9, 1777–1806.
[7]. Sarathkumar D., Jayakumar T., Sajin J. B., et al. (2025). Impact of electric vehicle integration on power grids: A comprehensive review. In: 2025 IEEE International Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Science (SCEECS).
[8]. Prencipe, L. P., van Essen, J. T., Caggiani, L., Ottomanelli, M., & Correia, G. H. d. A. (2022). A mathematical programming model for optimal fleet management of electric car-sharing systems with Vehicle-to-Grid operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133147.
[9]. Alfaverh, F., Denaï, M., & Sun, Y. (2021). Electrical vehicle grid integration for demand response in distribution networks using reinforcement learning. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 11(4), 348–361.
[10]. Yang, F. Q., Zhang, S. J., & Huang, W. L. (2019). A survey on electric vehicles: Impact of charging methods, charging infrastructures and charging behaviors on power grids. IEEE Access, 7, 103032–103050.
[11]. Lu, G., Zhang, G., Zhang, J., et al. (2023). Impact of electric vehicles access to distribution network under V2G mode. In: 2023 7th International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), pp. 444–448.
[12]. Dubey, A., & Santoso, S. (2015). Electric vehicle charging on residential distribution systems: Impacts and mitigations. IEEE Access, 3, 1871–1893.
[13]. Wang, S., Dong, Z. Y., Chen, C., Fan, H., & Luo, F. (2019). Expansion planning of active distribution networks with multiple distributed energy resources and ev sharing system. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(1), 602-611.
[14]. Liu, G., Chen, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Coordinated planning of active distribution network and V2G charging stations considering the load characteristics of V2G stations. In: 2022 IEEE 6th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 2773–2778.
[15]. Li, J., et al. (2020). Optimal investment of electrolyzers and seasonal storages in hydrogen supply chains incorporated with renewable electric networks. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 11(3), 1773–1784.
[16]. Tao, Y., Qiu, J., Lai, S., Zhang, X., & Wang, G. (2020). Collaborative planning for electricity distribution network and transportation system considering hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 6(3), 1211–1225.
[17]. Mansourlakouraj, M., Gautam, M., Livani, H., & Benidris, M. (2023). Multi-stage volt/VAR support in distribution grids: Risk-aware scheduling with real-time reinforcement learning control. IEEE Access, 11, 54822–54838.
[18]. Azimian, M., et al. (2023). Planning and financing strategy for clustered multi-carrier microgrids. IEEE Access, 11, 72050–72069.
[19]. Luo, Y., Zeng, B., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Shi, Q., & Liu, W. (2024). Coordinative planning of public transport electrification, RESs and energy networks for decarbonization of urban multi-energy systems: A government-market dual-driven framework. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 15(1), 538–555.
[20]. Efstratiadi, M.-A., Tsakanikas, S., Papadopoulos, P., & Salinas, D. R. (2024). A novel holistic energy management system incorporating PV generation and battery storage for commercial customers. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 15(1), 538–555.
[21]. Ali, A., Shaaban, M. F., & Mahmoud, K. (2025). Optimizing hydrogen systems and demand response for enhanced integration of RES and EVs in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 16(2), 1366–1378.
[22]. Fatih, E., Mithat C., K., & Nuh, E. (2018). Adaptive V2G peak shaving and smart charging control for grid integration of PEVs. Electric Power Components and Systems, 46(13), 1494–1508.
[23]. Mahmud, K., Morsalin, S., Kafle, Y. R., et al. (2016). Improved peak shaving in grid-connected domestic power systems combining photovoltaic generation, battery storage, and V2G-capable electric vehicle. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON), pp. 1–4.
[24]. Attou, N., Zidi, S. A., Hadjeri, S., & Khatir, M. (2021). Improved peak shaving and valley filling using V2G technology in grid connected microgrid. In: 2021 Third International Conference on Transportation and Smart Technologies (TST), pp. 53–58.
[25]. Majed, Roy, N. K., & Ahmed, A. (2025). Optimizing the load curve through V2G technology for sustainable energy management. Energy Reports, 13, 5848–5863.
[26]. Bin, C., Zelong, Z., & Yan, Y. (2022). Research on low-carbon economic dispatch of active distribution network considering V2G and demand response. In: 2022 12th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES), pp. 123–128.
[27]. Alfaverh, F., Denaï, M., & Sun, Y. (2023). Optimal vehicle-to-grid control for supplementary frequency regulation using deep reinforcement learning. Electric Power Systems Research, 214, 108949.
[28]. Ren, Y., Tan, M., Li, Z., Dai, Z., & Tan, W. (2024). Robust scheduling of a charging station considering uncertain charging demand and demand response. In: 2024 IEEE 8th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 4337–4341.
[29]. Shokouhmand, E., & Ghasemi, A. (2022). Stochastic optimal scheduling of electric vehicles charge/discharge modes of operation with the aim of microgrid flexibility and efficiency enhancement. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 32, 100929.
[30]. Chen, P., Han, L., Xin, G., et al. (2023). Game theory based optimal pricing strategy for V2G participating in demand response. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 59(4), 4673–4683.
[31]. Ma, Y., Lu, Y., Yin, Y., & Lei, Y. (2024). Pricing strategy of V2G demand response for industrial and commercial enterprises based on cooperative game. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 160, 110051.
[32]. Wang, F., Jiao, L., Zhu, K., & Zhang, L. (2023). Online edge computing demand response via deadline-aware V2G discharging auctions. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 22(12), 7279–7293.
[33]. Zhang, G., Liu, H., Xie, T., et al. (2024). Research on the dispatching of electric vehicles participating in vehicle-to-grid interaction: Considering grid stability and user benefits. Energies, 17(4), 812.
Cite this article
Xiang,Y. (2025). Demand Response-Based Carbon Reduction and Guidance Technologies for Vehicle-to-Grid Integration. Applied and Computational Engineering,186,226-232.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of CONF-FMCE 2025 Symposium: Semantic Communication for Media Compression and Transmission
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Unterluggauer, T., Rich, J., Andersen, P. B., & Hashemi, S. (2022). Electric vehicle charging infrastructure planning for integrated transportation and power distribution networks: A review. eTransportation, 100163.
[2]. Al-Awami, A. T., & Sortomme, E. (2011). Coordinating vehicle-to-grid services with energy trading. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 3(1), 453–462.
[3]. Takagi, M., Iwafune, Y., Yamaji, K., et al. (2012). Electricity pricing for PHEV bottom charge in daily load curve based on variation method. In: 2012 IEEE PES Innovative Smart Grid Technologies (ISGT), pp. 1–6.
[4]. Jordehi, A. R. (2019). Optimisation of demand response in electric power systems, a review. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 103, 308–319.
[5]. Paterakis, N. G., Erdinç, O., & Catalão, J. P. (2017). An overview of demand response: key-elements and international experience. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 69, 871–891.
[6]. Mastoi, M. S., Zhuang, S., Munir, H. M., et al. (2023). A study of charging-dispatch strategies and vehicle-to-grid technologies for electric vehicles in distribution networks. Energy Reports, 9, 1777–1806.
[7]. Sarathkumar D., Jayakumar T., Sajin J. B., et al. (2025). Impact of electric vehicle integration on power grids: A comprehensive review. In: 2025 IEEE International Students' Conference on Electrical, Electronics, and Computer Science (SCEECS).
[8]. Prencipe, L. P., van Essen, J. T., Caggiani, L., Ottomanelli, M., & Correia, G. H. d. A. (2022). A mathematical programming model for optimal fleet management of electric car-sharing systems with Vehicle-to-Grid operations. Journal of Cleaner Production, 368, 133147.
[9]. Alfaverh, F., Denaï, M., & Sun, Y. (2021). Electrical vehicle grid integration for demand response in distribution networks using reinforcement learning. IET Electrical Systems in Transportation, 11(4), 348–361.
[10]. Yang, F. Q., Zhang, S. J., & Huang, W. L. (2019). A survey on electric vehicles: Impact of charging methods, charging infrastructures and charging behaviors on power grids. IEEE Access, 7, 103032–103050.
[11]. Lu, G., Zhang, G., Zhang, J., et al. (2023). Impact of electric vehicles access to distribution network under V2G mode. In: 2023 7th International Conference on Smart Grid and Smart Cities (ICSGSC), pp. 444–448.
[12]. Dubey, A., & Santoso, S. (2015). Electric vehicle charging on residential distribution systems: Impacts and mitigations. IEEE Access, 3, 1871–1893.
[13]. Wang, S., Dong, Z. Y., Chen, C., Fan, H., & Luo, F. (2019). Expansion planning of active distribution networks with multiple distributed energy resources and ev sharing system. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 11(1), 602-611.
[14]. Liu, G., Chen, W., Wang, Y., et al. (2022). Coordinated planning of active distribution network and V2G charging stations considering the load characteristics of V2G stations. In: 2022 IEEE 6th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 2773–2778.
[15]. Li, J., et al. (2020). Optimal investment of electrolyzers and seasonal storages in hydrogen supply chains incorporated with renewable electric networks. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 11(3), 1773–1784.
[16]. Tao, Y., Qiu, J., Lai, S., Zhang, X., & Wang, G. (2020). Collaborative planning for electricity distribution network and transportation system considering hydrogen fuel cell vehicles. IEEE Transactions on Transportation Electrification, 6(3), 1211–1225.
[17]. Mansourlakouraj, M., Gautam, M., Livani, H., & Benidris, M. (2023). Multi-stage volt/VAR support in distribution grids: Risk-aware scheduling with real-time reinforcement learning control. IEEE Access, 11, 54822–54838.
[18]. Azimian, M., et al. (2023). Planning and financing strategy for clustered multi-carrier microgrids. IEEE Access, 11, 72050–72069.
[19]. Luo, Y., Zeng, B., Zhang, W., Liu, Y., Shi, Q., & Liu, W. (2024). Coordinative planning of public transport electrification, RESs and energy networks for decarbonization of urban multi-energy systems: A government-market dual-driven framework. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 15(1), 538–555.
[20]. Efstratiadi, M.-A., Tsakanikas, S., Papadopoulos, P., & Salinas, D. R. (2024). A novel holistic energy management system incorporating PV generation and battery storage for commercial customers. IEEE Transactions on Sustainable Energy, 15(1), 538–555.
[21]. Ali, A., Shaaban, M. F., & Mahmoud, K. (2025). Optimizing hydrogen systems and demand response for enhanced integration of RES and EVs in smart grids. IEEE Transactions on Smart Grid, 16(2), 1366–1378.
[22]. Fatih, E., Mithat C., K., & Nuh, E. (2018). Adaptive V2G peak shaving and smart charging control for grid integration of PEVs. Electric Power Components and Systems, 46(13), 1494–1508.
[23]. Mahmud, K., Morsalin, S., Kafle, Y. R., et al. (2016). Improved peak shaving in grid-connected domestic power systems combining photovoltaic generation, battery storage, and V2G-capable electric vehicle. In: 2016 IEEE International Conference on Power System Technology (POWERCON), pp. 1–4.
[24]. Attou, N., Zidi, S. A., Hadjeri, S., & Khatir, M. (2021). Improved peak shaving and valley filling using V2G technology in grid connected microgrid. In: 2021 Third International Conference on Transportation and Smart Technologies (TST), pp. 53–58.
[25]. Majed, Roy, N. K., & Ahmed, A. (2025). Optimizing the load curve through V2G technology for sustainable energy management. Energy Reports, 13, 5848–5863.
[26]. Bin, C., Zelong, Z., & Yan, Y. (2022). Research on low-carbon economic dispatch of active distribution network considering V2G and demand response. In: 2022 12th International Conference on Power and Energy Systems (ICPES), pp. 123–128.
[27]. Alfaverh, F., Denaï, M., & Sun, Y. (2023). Optimal vehicle-to-grid control for supplementary frequency regulation using deep reinforcement learning. Electric Power Systems Research, 214, 108949.
[28]. Ren, Y., Tan, M., Li, Z., Dai, Z., & Tan, W. (2024). Robust scheduling of a charging station considering uncertain charging demand and demand response. In: 2024 IEEE 8th Conference on Energy Internet and Energy System Integration (EI2), pp. 4337–4341.
[29]. Shokouhmand, E., & Ghasemi, A. (2022). Stochastic optimal scheduling of electric vehicles charge/discharge modes of operation with the aim of microgrid flexibility and efficiency enhancement. Sustainable Energy, Grids and Networks, 32, 100929.
[30]. Chen, P., Han, L., Xin, G., et al. (2023). Game theory based optimal pricing strategy for V2G participating in demand response. IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, 59(4), 4673–4683.
[31]. Ma, Y., Lu, Y., Yin, Y., & Lei, Y. (2024). Pricing strategy of V2G demand response for industrial and commercial enterprises based on cooperative game. International Journal of Electrical Power and Energy Systems, 160, 110051.
[32]. Wang, F., Jiao, L., Zhu, K., & Zhang, L. (2023). Online edge computing demand response via deadline-aware V2G discharging auctions. IEEE Transactions on Mobile Computing, 22(12), 7279–7293.
[33]. Zhang, G., Liu, H., Xie, T., et al. (2024). Research on the dispatching of electric vehicles participating in vehicle-to-grid interaction: Considering grid stability and user benefits. Energies, 17(4), 812.