Download pdf
Viewing the Change of Whig’s Political Thoughts by the Glorious Revolution (1679-1760)
- 1 University of Malaya
- 2 Sun Yat-sen University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study aims to compare and analyze the changes in Whig's political thoughts by the Glorious Revolution and how these changes Shape their political ideology to gain valuable insights into the formation of modern British political ideology in the specific period of 1679-1760. By using the research method of document analysis, we deeply analyzed 20 research results of different scholars from home and abroad on the Whig Party and the Glorious Revolution and summarized the main changes in the Whig Party's political thought. Our findings indicate that under the influence of the Glorious Revolution, the political thought of the Whig party took place mainly in four aspects: The role of Parliament, Contractual theory, Attitudes towards the monarchical power, and religious toleration. This study provides a new insight into the development of Whig political thought from the perspective of the Glorious Revolution.
Keywords
Whig, Political thoughts, Glorious Revolution, Changes
[1]. Yingjuan Wu, “The story of the history of the Whigs and Tories in Britain”, Democracy & Science (2021): 47-51.
[2]. Honghai Li, “History and Myth: 800 Years of Legends”. Peking University Law Journal 27, No.6 (2015): 1594-1614.
[3]. Dahua Xu, “On the Influence of the ‘Glorious Revolution’ to the History of England”, Journal of Hubei University of Education, no.1 (2008): 83-84.
[4]. Li Hu, “Disagreement and Consensus: How England Opposed France's Claim to the Spanish Throne in 1700?”, Historical Review, no.4 (2022): 184-193+221.
[5]. H. Butterfield, The Whig interpretation of history (London: Bell and Sons, 1931)
[6]. J. G. A. Pocock, The Ancient Constitution and the Feudal Law: A Study of English Historical Thought in the Seventeenth Century: A Reissue With a Retrospect (Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1987)
[7]. R William, “The Origins of ’Whig’ and ‘Tory’ English Political Language”, The Historical Journal, no.2 (1974): 247-264.
[8]. Julia Rudolph, Revolution by Degrees: James Tyrrell and Whig Political Thought in the Late Seventeenth Century (New York: Palgrave Macmillan, 2002), 106-123, 158
[9]. Han Shen and Xincheng Liu, British parliamentary and political history(Nanjing: Nanjing University Press,1991), 193-199, 263-264.
[10]. Zhaoxiang Yan, “The evolution of the three main political parties in the UK”, History Teaching, No.4 (2012): 67-72.
[11]. Zhaoxiang Yan, History of the British political party system (Beijing: China Social Science Press, 1993), 6, 31-34
[12]. Zhaoxiang Yan, History of British Political Thought (Beijing: China Social Science Press, 2010)
[13]. Hengxiang Ma, “A Study of Early Whig Political Thought 1679-1714”, Nanjing University (2012)
[14]. Qisong Huang, “What is political thought - A normative interpretation of political thought”, CASS Journal of Political Science, No.6 (2012): 115-125.
[15]. Datong Xu, “Two Different Systems of Political Thought between China and the West”, CASS Journal of Political Science, No.3 (2004): 23-30.
[16]. Zehua Liu, General history of Chinese political thought-treatise (Beijing: China Renmin University Press, 2014)
[17]. Denzin, N. K., Lincoln, Y. S, “Transforming Qualitative Research Methods: Is It a Revolution?”, Journal of Contemporary Ethnography 24, No.3 (1995): 349–358.
[18]. Jinyuan Liu, “On the Rise of Party Politics in Modern Britain”, Journal of Historical Science, no.11 (2009): 83-91.
[19]. Hengxiang Ma, “A Review of the Ideas of British Whig Theorist James Tyrrell”. Chinese Journal of British Studies, 2011: 288-301.
[20]. Chuanxu Yuan, “Discussion of the Glorious Revolution”, Book House (2007): 52-58.
Cite this article
Xiong,Y.;Li,M. (2024). Viewing the Change of Whig’s Political Thoughts by the Glorious Revolution (1679-1760). Communications in Humanities Research,29,48-59.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).