A Literal Review of Chinese Scholar Analysis on the Kant’s Transcendental Logic and Formal Logic from the Critique of Pure Reason

Haobin Zhang

doi:10.54254/2753-7064/4/20220632

Research Article

Open access

Published on 17 May 2023

Download pdf

Zhang,H. (2023). A Literal Review of Chinese Scholar Analysis on the Kant’s Transcendental Logic and Formal Logic from the Critique of Pure Reason. Communications in Humanities Research,4,426-431.

Export citation

A Literal Review of Chinese Scholar Analysis on the Kant’s Transcendental Logic and Formal Logic from the Critique of Pure Reason

Haobin Zhang *^,1,

¹ Nansha College Preparatory Academy, 180 Gang Qian Boulevard, Guangzhou, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/4/20220632

Abstract

The article analysis the Transcendental logic and the formal logic created by Immanuel Kant based on Kant’s theory on the book “critique of Pure reason”. The research focusses on the Chinese scholar and analysis the Transcendental logic and the formal logic. The article first analysis the original idea of the Transcendental logic and the formal logic in Kant’s critique of Pure reason. Based on that idea, the analysis reviews the theory of the Chinese scholar through the discussion of the origin of the Transcendental logic and the formal logic and the relationship between them. Continuing the next part, the analysis discusses the related idea about Transcendental logic and the formal logic: the cognition awareness and the range of the Transcendental logic and the formal logic and its connection to the philosophers after Kant. The result reveals the contribution of Kant’s Transcendental logic and the formal logic to the science subject aspect and comprehensive meaning in metaphysics.

Keywords

critique of Pure reason, formal logic, Transcendental logic, Kant

View pdf

References

[1]. Qi, L. (2011). Kant's science of knowledge. The Commercial Press.

[2]. Zhao, G. (2001). A brief history about western philosophy. Beijin University Press.

[3]. IMMANUEL, K. (1998). Critique of pure reason (G. Paul & W. W. Allen, Eds.). CAMBRIDGE UNIVERSITY PRESS.

[4]. Deng, X. (2004). Foundation laid by Kant's Transcendental logic for the formal logic. Jiangsu Social Sciences.

[5]. Hu, C. (2018). Law of contradiction and time?Kant's foundation of Transcendental logic. Hubei Social Sciences.

[6]. Ye, X. (2003). Kant's "Transcendental logic" and the theory of knowledge. Social Sciences in Guangdong.

[7]. Yang, Z. (2009). From Transcendental logic to formal logic-- the discussion about Kant's logical thinking. Theory Monthly.

[8]. Deng, X. (2006). A Research into Kant's" Intelectual Intuition." JOURNAL OF LITERATURE HISTORY AND PHILOSOPHY.

[9]. Qiang, Y. (1999). The discussion of the "Transcendental idea" in Kant's philosophy. Jianghan Tribune

[10]. Qiang, Y. (2007). Kant's philosophy of transcendental logic and its meaning. Philosophical Research.

Cite this article

Zhang,H. (2023). A Literal Review of Chinese Scholar Analysis on the Kant’s Transcendental Logic and Formal Logic from the Critique of Pure Reason. Communications in Humanities Research,4,426-431.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 2

Conference website: https://www.icihcs.org/

ISBN：978-1-915371-31-7(Print) / 978-1-915371-32-4(Online)

Conference date: 18 December 2022

Editor：Faraz Ali Bughio, David T. Mitchell

Series: Communications in Humanities Research

Volume number: Vol.4

ISSN：2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).