
The Rise and Assimilation of Western Queer Cinema: Resistance and Dilemma in the Mainstream
- 1 University of Liverpool
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Queer cinema has risen to prominence in recent years, frequently featured at major international film festivals and gaining a foothold in the global market. As an extension of queer theory, which highlights the fluidity of gender and sexuality, queer cinema initially aimed to challenge traditional gender norms and heteronormativity through radical narrative structures and visual expressions. Early queer films often subverted mainstream narratives, offering an alternative, politically charged lens to explore marginalized identities. However, as queer cinema has increasingly entered the mainstream market, it has been subjected to assimilation and commodification pressures. This has led to a dilution of its radical and subversive elements, as the narratives are increasingly shaped to fit within heteronormative frameworks. Queer characters, once at the centre of challenging societal norms, are now often marginalized or simplified to meet the expectations of broader, more mainstream audiences. This paper examines how capitalism and patriarchy have contributed to the assimilation and marginalization of queer cinema, limiting its political expression and cultural impact. While Russo highlights how Hollywood perpetuates lazy stereotypes of queer characters, White suggests that cinema, as a tool of capitalist and patriarchal power, helps maintain normative gender and sexual roles. Despite these challenges, queer cinema remains an important cultural tool for breaking down stereotypes and resisting the dominance of heteronormativity. To maintain its relevance and continue its political and cultural resistance, queer cinema must resist commodification and strive for more diverse, authentic representations of queer identities.
Keywords
Queer Cinema, mainstream movie, assimilation, marginalization, Queer theory
[1]. Lonac, S. (2022). The Mainstreaming of American Queer Cinema. Canadian Review of American Studies, 52(2), 153–168. https://doi.org/10.3138/cras-2021-013
[2]. Warner, M. 1993. Fear of a Queer Planet: Queer Politics and Social Theory. Minneapolis: University Of Minnesota Press.
[3]. White, P. (2000). Uninvited: classical Hollywood cinema and lesbian representability. Choice Reviews Online, 37(11), 37–6181. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.37-6181
[4]. Russo, V. (1991). The Celluloid Closet : Homosexuality in the movies. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA21183354
[5]. Burns, N. (2023). “It means possibility.” Lateral, 12(1). https://doi.org/10.25158/l12.1.3
[6]. Sedgwick, E. K. (1993). Tendencies. In Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822381860
[7]. Butler, J. (1988). Performative Acts and Gender Constitution: An essay in Phenomenology and Feminist Theory. Theatre Journal, 40(4), 519. https://doi.org/10.2307/3207893
[8]. Sedgwick, E. K. (1990). Epistemology of the closet. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA25990915
[9]. Rohy, V. (2018). 10. The Cinema of the Impossible: Queer Theory and Narrative. In Edinburgh University Press eBooks (pp. 145–156). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474424752-014
[10]. Benshoff, H. M., & Griffin, S. (2006). Queer images: a history of gay and lesbian film in America. Choice Reviews Online, 43(09), 43–5168. https://doi.org/10.5860/choice.43-5168
[11]. Whatling, C. (1997). Screen dreams : fantasising lesbians in film / Clare Whatling. Manchester University Press.
[12]. Bennett, J. (2006). A queer anxiety. Journal of Homosexuality, 52(1–2), 101–123. https://doi.org/10.1300/j082v52n01_05
[13]. Bell, M. (2016). The boys in the band: Flashpoints of Cinema, History, and Queer Politics. Wayne State University Press.
[14]. Richards, S. (2016). A New Queer Cinema renaissance. Queer Studies in Media & Popular Culture, 1(2), 215–229. https://doi.org/10.1386/qsmpc.1.2.215_1
[15]. Needham, G. (2010). Brokeback Mountain. In Edinburgh University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1515/9780748633845
[16]. Pellegrini, C. (2022). Anticipating the plot: overdetermining heteronormative destiny on the twenty-first century screen. Textual Practice, 37(3), 393–415. https://doi.org/10.1080/0950236x.2022.2043932
[17]. Dyer, R. (1977). Gays and film. https://www.amazon.com/Gays-film-Richard-Dyer-editor/dp/0851700659
[18]. Keeling, K. (2007). The Witch’s Flight. In Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822390145
[19]. Holmlund, C., & Fuchs, C. (1997). Between the Sheets, In the Streets: Queer, Lesbian, Gay documentary. In University of Minnesota Press eBooks. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA47316817
[20]. Creekmur, C., & Doty, A. (1995). Out in culture. In Duke University Press eBooks. https://doi.org/10.1215/9780822397441
[21]. Goldin, D. (2022). A male glance at the “Male Gaze.” Psychoanalytic Inquiry, 42(7), 601–610. https://doi.org/10.1080/07351690.2022.2121150
[22]. Halberstam, J. (2005). In a queer time and place: transgender bodies, subcultural lives. http://ci.nii.ac.jp/ncid/BA70887604
[23]. McBean, S. (2018). 9. Digital intimacies and queer narratives. In Edinburgh University Press eBooks (pp. 132–144). https://doi.org/10.1515/9781474424752-013
Cite this article
Zhu,Y. (2024). The Rise and Assimilation of Western Queer Cinema: Resistance and Dilemma in the Mainstream. Communications in Humanities Research,52,74-80.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).