Download pdf
Implications of the Critical Period Hypothesis for Oral English Instruction in Primary Schools in China
- 1 Shanghai Jiao Tong University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Oral language instruction has long been overlooked in primary school English education in China. However, with the rapid pace of globalization and the growing demand for English proficiency, oral skills have become a crucial part of students’ overall language competence. Based on the Critical Period Hypothesis (CPH), investigating the sensitive period for language learning at different ages and its implications for educational practices has become a key approach to improving educational quality. Therefore, this paper seeks to explore how to enhance the quality of oral language teaching in primary school English classrooms in China through the application of the CPH. It specifically focuses on adopting effective teaching strategies to help students overcome challenges in oral language learning, thereby fostering the holistic development of their language skills. In addition, this study reviews and analyzes relevant literature, with a focus on recent research findings. And the results indicate that teaching strategies based on the CPH, such as group role-playing and dubbing activities, can effectively improve students’ oral language skills. These methods provide students with more opportunities for language practice, thereby addressing the shortcomings of oral language teaching. However, further experimental research is needed to validate the effectiveness of these teaching strategies.
Keywords
Critical Period Hypothesis, Oral English Instruction, Language Acquisition, Primary School English Education
[1]. Lenneberg, E.H. (1967) Biological Foundations of Language. Wiley, New York.
[2]. Norrman, G. (2024) Reconceptualizing the critical period hypothesis for second language acquisition: An appraisal of Lenneberg’s work on the epigenesis of language.Language Sciences, 105: 101645.
[3]. Liu, Y. (2020) A Study of Age in Second Language Acquisition -- Based on the Critical Period Hypothesis.Overseas English,16.
[4]. Penfield, W. and Roberts, L. (1959) Speech and Brain Mechanisms.Princeton:Princeton University Press
[5]. Johnson, J.S. and Newport E.L. (1989) Critical period effects in second language learning: the influence of maturational state on the acquisition of English as a second language.Cognitive Psychology, 21: 60-99.
[6]. Jiang, C.H. (2021) Critical Period Hypothesis in Language Acquisition.In:2021 International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries.
[7]. Vanhove, J. (2013) The critical period hypothesis in second language acquisition: a statistical critique and a reanalysis.PloS One, 8: e69172.
[8]. Abrahamsson, N. and Hyltenstam, K. (2009) Age of onset and nativelikeness in a second language: Listener perception versus linguistic scrutiny.Language Learning, 59: 249-306.
[9]. Marinova-Todd, S.H., Marshall, D.B. and Snow, C.E. (2000) Three misconceptions about age and L2 learning. TESOL Quarterly, 34: 9-34.
[10]. Colognesi, S., Coppe, T. and Lucchini, S. (2023) Improving the oral language skills of elementary school students through video-recorded performances. Teaching and Teacher Education, 128,: 104141.
[11]. Dong, Y.P. (2003) Are We Ready for “an Early Start in Foreign Language Learning”? -- A Survey of Primary School English Education in Guangdong Province.Modern Foreign Languages,01.
[12]. Zhou, R.R. (2011) Investigation on the Current Situation of Oral English Learning of Primary School Students and Strategy Research. Nanjing Normal University.
[13]. Colognesi, S., et al. (2020) Formative peer assessment to enhance primary school pupils’ oral skills: Comparison of written feedback without discussion or oral feedback during a discussion.Studies in Educational Evaluation. 67: 100917.
Cite this article
Zhao,Z. (2024). Implications of the Critical Period Hypothesis for Oral English Instruction in Primary Schools in China. Communications in Humanities Research,62,33-39.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).