
A Comparison of Ethnic Policies in Rwanda and Tanzania
- 1 The High School Affiliated to Renmin University of China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Ethnic construction is a historical phenomenon and process, generally involving two main directions: assimilation, integration, and unity among ethnic groups, and differentiation, separation, and diversification. Typically, these directions alternate and may coexist during certain historical stages. Tanzania and Rwanda are both multi-ethnic countries, but their ethnic relations could not be more different. The former, with more than 120 ethnic groups, is basically in harmony, while the latter has erupted into large-scale ethnic conflicts. Rwanda and Tanzania exhibit significant differences in their processes of ethnic construction, influenced by factors such as colonial rule and ethnic policies. The composition of ethnic groups and interethnic relations in these countries demonstrate distinct characteristics. This study aims to compare the ethnic composition and ethnic policies of Rwanda and Tanzania, elucidating the shaping role of ethnic policies on interethnic relations and exploring practical pathways towards ethnic integration and coexistence. This paper mainly analyses the process and relationship of ethnic construction in Rwanda and Tanzania through literature and data analysis. This paper finds that whether the relationship between ethnic groups is harmonious mainly depends on whether the government can gradually eliminate ethnic barriers and strengthen ethnic identity while respecting history, rather than ignoring or even strengthening the contradictions between ethnic groups.
Keywords
Rwanda, Tanzania, Rwandan genocide, nation, ethnic policies
[1]. Ali A. Mazrui and C. Wondji (eds.), General History of Africa (VIII), Africa since 1935, Paris: UNESCO, 1993.
[2]. Mackintosh Anne, “Rwanda: Beyond ethnic conflict”, Development in practice, Vol. 7, No. 4, 1997, pp. 464-474.
[3]. Mahmond Mamdani: When Victims Become Killers: Colonialism, Nativism, and the Genocide in Rwanda, Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2020.
[4]. Bowen Roger, “Revivalism and ethnic conflict: questions from Rwanda”, Transformation, Vol.12, No. 2, 1995, pp.15-18.
[5]. Blouin Arthur and Mukand Sharun W., “Erasing Ethnicity? Propaganda, Nation Building, and Identity in Rwanda”, The Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 127, No.3, 2019, pp. 1008-1062.
[6]. Rodger Yeager, Tanzania: An African Experiment, London: Routledge, 2020.
[7]. Miguel Edward, “Tribe or Nation? Nation Building and Public Goods in Kenya versus Tanzania”, World Politics, Vol.36, No.3, 2004, pp. 327-362.
[8]. Aminzade Ronald, “The Dialect of Nation Building in Postcolonial Tanzania”, Sociological Quarterly, Vol.54, No.3, 2013, pp. 335-366.
[9]. Larson Erik and Aminzade Ron, “Nation-building in post-colonial nation-states: the cases of Tanzania and Fiji”, International Social Science Journal, Vol. 59, No.192, 2008, pp. 169-182.
[10]. Boone Catherine and Nyeme Lydia, “Land Institutions and Political Ethnicity in Africa: Evidence from Tanzania”, Comparative Politics, Vol. 48, No.1, 2015, pp. 67-86.
Cite this article
Wang,Z. (2023). A Comparison of Ethnic Policies in Rwanda and Tanzania. Communications in Humanities Research,11,308-314.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).