Download pdf
The Beginning of Democracy in Eastern European Countries from the 1990s to the 2010s and Its Contemporary Crisis: Poland and the Czech Republic as Examples
- 1 The Second High School Attached to Beijing Normal University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In 1989, Poland and the Czech Republic almost simultaneously got rid of the socialist regime and gradually embarked on the road to Western democracy. They persisted in the global economic recession in 2008 and achieved economic leaps; however, under the impact of the refugee wave since 2011, conflicts that had been squeezed for decades broke out. For a time, populist forces were rampant in Eastern European countries. Faced with these populist forces, many people lost hope in democracy. This paper aims to present the beginning of the democratization process in Eastern European countries from the 1980s to the 1990s and the reasons for the rampant populist forces in Eastern Europe. The author believes that Eastern European society experienced triple changes in social structure, economic model, and political system at the end of the Cold War. These triple changes exacerbated the inner insecurity of the Eastern European people, and the insecurity planted the seeds of populism. The Soviet Union’s long-term control in Eastern Europe led to people’s resistance to the Soviet Union and even the Russian nation. Since the second decade of the 21st century, with the arrival of the refugee waves and many other events in the international situation, this resistance against Russia rose to xenophobia, popularized by populist thoughts, used, and expanded by power. Finally, by analyzing the current status of populist parties in Eastern Europe, the author believes that these populist parties are trying to establish a contemporary nation-state with authoritarian solid rule in the 21st century.
Keywords
populism, democracy, Eastern Europe, Poland, Czech Republic
[1]. Thomas Piketty (2014) Capital, Cambridge, MA: Bellnap Press.
[2]. Jacob Hacker (2008) The Great Risk Shift: The New Economic In security and the Decline of the American Dream, NY: Oxford University Press.
[3]. Matthew J. Goodwin, Oliver Heath. (2016) The 2016 Referendum, Brexit and the Left Behind? An aggregate-level analysis of the result”, Political Quarterly, Vol. 87, No.3,pp.323-332.
[4]. Ronald Inglehart (1990) Cultural Shift in Advanced Industrial Society, Princeton: Princeton University.
[5]. Ronald Inglehart (1997) Modernization and Post-modernization: Cultural, Economic and Political Change in 43 Societies, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[6]. Ronald Inglehart (1977) The Silent Revolution, Princeton: Princeton University Press.
[7]. Michael Minkenberg (2002) The Radical Right in Post-socialist Central and Eastern Europe: Comparative Observations and Interpretations. Eastern Europe Politics and Societies, Vol.16, Issue.2, pp.336-363.
[8]. MarcM. Howard (2003) The Weakness of Civil Society in Post-Communist Europe, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[9]. Sarah L. de Lange (2007) A New Winning Formula? The Programmatic appeal of the Radical Right. Party Politics, Vol.13, Issue.4, pp.410-435.
[10]. Herbert Kitschelt (1995) Formation of Party Cleavage in Post-Communist Democracies, Theoretical Propositions”, Party Politics, Vol.1, Issue.4, pp.447-471.
[11]. Enrique Hernández, Hanspeter Kriesi (2016) The Electoral Consequences of the Financial and Economic Crisis in Europe”, European Journal of Political Research, Vol.55, Issue.2, pp. 203-223.
[12]. Jin Yan and Qin Hui (2012) Ten Years of Vicissitudes: Economic Transformation and Ideological Changes in Eastern European Countries. Beijing: Oriental Publishing House, pp. 291-292.
[13]. Andrea L. Pirro. (2014) Populist Radical Right Parties in Central and Eastern Europe: The Different Context and Issues of the Prophet of the Patria”, Government and Opposition, Vol.49, Issue.4, pp.600-627.
Cite this article
Lu,Y. (2023). The Beginning of Democracy in Eastern European Countries from the 1990s to the 2010s and Its Contemporary Crisis: Poland and the Czech Republic as Examples. Communications in Humanities Research,15,253-258.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).