How Should the US and China Deal with Tensions over Disputed Territories?

Haoran Liu

doi:10.54254/2753-7102/10/2024088

Research Article

Open access

Published on 4 September 2024

Download pdf

Liu,H. (2024). How Should the US and China Deal with Tensions over Disputed Territories?. Advances in Social Behavior Research,10,73-81.

Export citation

How Should the US and China Deal with Tensions over Disputed Territories?

Haoran Liu *^,1,

¹ Claremont School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/10/2024088

Abstract

The disputed area has an integral position in the game of great powers. Territorial disputes are the disagreement over the possession of territory between two or more political entities. They may occur anytime, causing tension to arise. Different actions and statements from each country will affect the future development of tensions. These kinds of tensions may affect countries, the future development of the local areas, and even people's lives. In recent years, tensions have grown over territorial disputes with China. Different political entities are trying to maintain their interests in the region. Dealing with such tensions will require the joint efforts of China, the United States, local and other countries. This dissertation will introduce the background of these disputed territories through historical events and current conditions, and find the causes of the tension in the disputed territories. This can help us better understand the relationship between these countries and increase our understanding of the region. The paper will also study solutions that benefit all parties, comparing their advantages and disadvantages, and analyze the effect of these solutions. Since peace is a common goal, avoiding war while safeguarding the interests of all parties is beneficial to the future development of all.

Keywords

territory disputation, the US

View pdf

References

[1]. Allayarov, S. (2023). International law with Chinese characteristics - The South China Sea territorial dispute. Institute of International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.iir.cz/en/international-law-with-chinese-characteristics-the-south-china-sea-territorial-dispute-1 (Accessed: 5 November 2023).

[2]. Asia Society. (2022). Avoiding war over Taiwan. Retrieved from https://asiasociety.org/center-us-china-relations/avoiding-war-over-taiwan (Accessed: 13 November 2023).

[3]. Bailiang, C. (2022). Can China really reunify Taiwan? The New York Times. Retrieved from https://cn.nytimes.com/asia-pacific/20220803/china-invade-taiwan/ (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

[4]. Bodeen, C. (2023). China sends 43 planes and 7 ships near Taiwan in ongoing military pressure campaign. PBS NewsHour. Retrieved from https://www.pbs.org/newshour/world/china-sends-43-planes-and-7-ships-near-taiwan-in-ongoing-military-pressure-campaign (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[5]. Brown, O. (2023). How Russia’s war on Ukraine is threatening climate security. Chatham House. Retrieved from https://www.chathamhouse.org/2023/03/how-russias-war-ukraine-threatening-climate-security (Accessed: 14 November 2023).

[6]. Buchan, N. (2023). The world after a successful Chinese invasion of Taiwan. Taipei Times. Retrieved from https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2023/07/14/2003803158 (Accessed: 30 November 2023).

[7]. Bureau of East Asian and Pacific Affairs. (2022). U.S. relations with Taiwan. U.S. Department of State. Retrieved from https://www.state.gov/u-s-relations-with-taiwan/ (Accessed: 7 December 2023).

[8]. Butowsky, L. (2014). South China Sea dispute reaches United Nations. YaleGlobal Online. Retrieved from https://archive-yaleglobal.yale.edu/content/south-china-sea-dispute-reaches-united-nations (Accessed: 14 November 2023).

[9]. Center for Preventive Action. (2020). Military confrontation in the South China Sea. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/report/military-confrontation-south-china-sea (Accessed: 2 November 2023).

[10]. Central Government Portal. (2013). Peaceful unification·one country, two systems. Retrieved from https://www.gov.cn/test/2005-07/29/content_18285.htm (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

[11]. Cheung, H. (2016). Taiwan in time: The great retreat. Taipei Times. Retrieved from https://www.taipeitimes.com/News/feat/archives/2016/12/04/2003660529 (Accessed: 2 October 2023).

[12]. Christensen, T. J. (1999). China, the U.S.-Japan alliance, and the security dilemma in East Asia. International Security, 23(4), 49–80. https://doi.org/10.1162/isec.23.4.49

[13]. Colby, E. (2022). Why protecting Taiwan really matters to the U.S. TIME. Retrieved from https://time.com/6221072/why-protecting-taiwan-really-matters-to-the-u-s/ (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

[14]. Congressional Research Service. (2023). U.S.-China strategic competition in South and East China Seas: Background and issues for Congress. Retrieved from https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/R/R42784 (Accessed: 13 November 2023).

[15]. Crisis Group. (2016). East China Sea: Preventing clashes from becoming crises. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/north-east-asia/china/east-china-sea-preventing-clashes-becoming-crises (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[16]. De Castro, R. (2015). The Philippines confronts China in the South China Sea: Power politics vs. liberalism-legalism. Asian Perspective, 39(1), 71–100. Retrieved from https://www.jstor.org/stable/43738115 (Accessed: 5 November 2023).

[17]. Domingo, J. (2023). US reaffirms commitment to defend Japan, including disputed islands. The Defense Post. Retrieved from https://www.thedefensepost.com/2023/10/06/us-defend-japan-senkaku/ (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[18]. Freund, E. (2017). Freedom of navigation in the South China Sea: A practical guide. Belfer Center for Science and International Affairs. Retrieved from https://www.belfercenter.org/publication/freedom-navigation-south-china-sea-practical-guide (Accessed: 17 November 2023).

[19]. Ge, S. (2022). People's Liberation Army exercises in the Taiwan Strait the most powerful expert: Approaching the Taiwan Island unprecedented. Xinhua Net. Retrieved from http://www.xinhuanet.com/2022-08/06/c1128895175.htm (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[20]. Gewirtz, P. (2016). Limits of law in the South China Sea. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/limits-of-law-in-the-south-china-sea/ (Accessed: 13 November 2023).

[21]. Goldstein, S. (2023). Understanding the One China policy. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/understanding-the-one-china-policy/ (Accessed: 15 November 2023).

[22]. Green, M., & Glaser, B. (2017). What is the U.S. “One China” policy, and why does it matter? Center for Strategic and International Studies (CSIS). Retrieved from https://www.csis.org/analysis/what-us-one-china-policy-and-why-does-it-matter (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[23]. Grünhaupt, T. (2023). Short overview: The economic importance of the South China Sea (SCS). LinkedIn. Retrieved from https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/short-overview-economic-importance-south-china-sea-scs-grünhaupt-mjcxe (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[24]. Hale, E. (2023). How prepared is Taiwan for a war with China? Al Jazeera. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/10/10/how-prepared-is-taiwan-for-a-war-with-china (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[25]. Holt, S. (2022). Five countries, other than China, most dependent on the South China Sea. CNBC. Retrieved from https://www.cnbc.com/2022/11/18/five-countries-other-than-china-most-dependent-on-the-south-china-sea.html (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[26]. Hsiao, R. (2021). Taiwanese preference for status quo remains constant even as views harden. Global Taiwan Institute. Retrieved from https://globaltaiwan.org/2021/07/taiwanese-preference-for-status-quo-remains-constant-even-as-views-harden/ (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[27]. Jiang, Y. (2013). The “Diaoyu Islands” dispute and the prospect of Sino-Japanese relations. China Institute of International Studies. Retrieved from https://www.ciis.org.cn/yjcg/xslw/202007/t20200710_1298.html (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

[28]. Kelter, F. (2023). China targets ‘unity in thought’ with campaign on Xi’s philosophy. Al Jazeera. Retrieved from https://www.aljazeera.com/news/2023/6/14/china-targets-unity-in-thought-with-campaign-on-xis-philosophy (Accessed: 30 November 2023).

[29]. Kowalewski, A. (2016). FONOPs in the South China Sea. Institute for China-America Studies. Retrieved from https://chinaus-icas.org/research/fonops-in-the-south-china-sea/ (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[30]. Kuok, L. (no date). The U.S. FON program in the South China Sea. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2016/07/the-us-fon-program-in-the-south-china-sea.pdf (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[31]. Liebermann, O., Britzky, H., Mattingly, P., & Lendon, B. (2023). US and Japan strengthen military relationship with upgraded Marine unit in attempt to deter China. CNN. Retrieved from https://edition.cnn.com/2023/01/11/politics/us-japan-marine-unit-china/index.html (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[32]. Lieberthal, K. (2011). The American pivot to Asia. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/the-american-pivot-to-asia/ (Accessed: 12 October 2023).

[33]. Lippert, B., & Volker, P. (2020). Strategic rivalry between United States and China. Stiftung Wissenschaft und Politik (SWP). Retrieved from https://www.swp-berlin.org/publikation/strategic-rivalry-between-united-states-and-china (Accessed: 7 December 2023).

[34]. Lyttle, C. (2022). Why is the East China Sea a potential flashpoint for Japan and China? Investment Monitor. Retrieved from https://www.investmentmonitor.ai/features/east-china-sea-japan-china-senkaku-islands/?cf-view (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[35]. Maizland, L. (2023). Why China-Taiwan relations are so tense. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/backgrounder/china-taiwan-relations-tension-us-policy-biden (Accessed: 27 September 2023).

[36]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of the People's Republic of China. (2022). China is committed to maintaining peace, stability, and order in the South China Sea. Retrieved from https://www.mfa.gov.cn/web/wjb673085/zzjg673183/bjhysws674671/bhzcyfllc/202203/t20220323_10654451.shtml (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

[37]. Nehru, V. (2014). A new approach to problem-solving in the South China Sea. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2014/08/18/new-approach-to-problem-solving-in-south-china-sea-pub-56411 (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[38]. Oliveira, A. (2022). Assessing neutrality: The United States' role in the Diaoyu Islands dispute. E-International Relations. Retrieved from https://www.e-ir.info/2022/06/24/assessing-neutrality-the-united-states-role-in-the-diaoyu-islands-dispute/ (Accessed: 5 November 2023).

[39]. Hong Kong Legal Hub. (n.d.). "One country, two systems" and the Basic Law. Retrieved from https://www.legalhub.gov.hk/details.php?a=10&v=one-country-two-systems-and-the-basic-law# (Accessed: 7 December 2023).

[40]. Paal, D. (2016). Maintaining peace across Taiwan Strait can benefit all. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/01/21/maintaining-peace-across-taiwan-strait-can-benefit-all-pub-62558 (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[41]. Paal, D. H. (n.d.). Maintaining peace across Taiwan Strait can benefit all. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace. Retrieved from https://carnegieendowment.org/2016/01/21/maintaining-peace-across-taiwan-strait-can-benefit-all-pub-62558 (Accessed: 13 November 2023).

[42]. Panda, A. (2017). China, ASEAN come to agreement on a framework South China Sea Code of Conduct. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2017/05/china-asean-come-to-agreement-on-a-framework-south-china-sea-code-of-conduct/ (Accessed: 15 November 2023).

[43]. Perlez, J. (2012). Vietnam law on contested islands draws China’s ire. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com/2012/06/22/world/asia/china-criticizes-vietnam-in-dispute-over-islands.html (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[44]. Poling, G. (2020). The conventional wisdom on China’s island bases is dangerously wrong. War on the Rocks. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2020/01/the-conventional-wisdom-on-chinas-island-bases-is-dangerously-wrong/ (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[45]. International Crisis Group. (2023). Preventing war in the Taiwan Strait. Retrieved from https://www.crisisgroup.org/asia/north-east-asia/taiwan-strait-china/333-preventing-war-taiwan-strait (Accessed: 7 November 2023).

[46]. Resar, A. (2022). The 1992 Consensus: Why it worked and why it fell apart. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2022/07/the-1992-consensus-why-it-worked-and-why-it-fell-apart/ (Accessed: 13 November 2023).

[47]. Reuter. (2023). US expects more cooperation with India in South China Sea. VOA News. Retrieved from https://www.voanews.com/a/us-expects-more-cooperation-with-india-in-south-china-sea-/7159040.html (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[48]. Rosso, S. (2023). Ask the experts: How to stabilize U.S.-China relations. Carnegie Corporation of New York. Retrieved from https://www.carnegie.org/our-work/article/ask-experts-how-stabilize-us-china-relations/ (Accessed: 29 September 2023).

[49]. Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI). (n.d.). Promoting crisis management in the East China Sea. Retrieved from https://www.sipri.org/research/conflict-peace-and-security/asia/promoting-crisis-management-east-china-sea (Accessed: 13 November 2023).

[50]. Smith, S. (2013). A Sino-Japanese clash in the East China Sea. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/report/sino-japanese-clash-east-china-sea (Accessed: 27 November 2023).

[51]. Taiwan Documents Project. (1982). The "Six Assurances" to Taiwan. Retrieved from http://www.taiwandocuments.org/assurances.htm (Accessed: 3 October 2023).

[52]. Thornton, S. A. (n.d.). Averting conflict in the South China Sea: Steps to restore rules and restraint. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/wp-content/uploads/2020/11/Susan-Thornton.pdf (Accessed: 9 November 2023).

[53]. Tiezzi, S. (2015). How Eisenhower saved Taiwan. The Diplomat. Retrieved from https://thediplomat.com/2015/07/how-eisenhower-saved-taiwan/ (Accessed: 5 November 2023).

[54]. Council on Foreign Relations. (n.d.). Timeline: China’s maritime disputes. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/timeline/chinas-maritime-disputes (Accessed: 5 November 2023).

[55]. Brookings Institution. (n.d.). Understanding the One China policy. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/understanding-the-one-china-policy/ (Accessed: 13 October 2023).

[56]. Wang, B., & Siu, M. (2023). On the role of Track II diplomacy in Sino-West relations. Unravel. Retrieved from https://unravel.ink/on-the-role-of-track-ii-diplomacy-in-sino-west-relations/ (Accessed: 1 November 2023).

[57]. Wiegand, K. (2020). How Biden should handle the South China Sea disputes. War on the Rocks. Retrieved from https://warontherocks.com/2020/11/how-biden-should-handle-the-south-china-sea-disputes/ (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

[58]. Will, B. (n.d.). The U.S. pivot to Asia and American grand strategy. Council on Foreign Relations. Retrieved from https://www.cfr.org/project/us-pivot-asia-and-american-grand-strategy (Accessed: 12 October 2023).

[59]. Yuan, I. (2000). Confidence-building across the Taiwan Strait: Taiwan Strait as a peace zone proposal. Brookings Institution. Retrieved from https://www.brookings.edu/articles/confidence-building-across-the-taiwan-strait-taiwan-strait-as-a-peace-zone-proposal/ (Accessed: 8 November 2023).

Cite this article

Liu,H. (2024). How Should the US and China Deal with Tensions over Disputed Territories?. Advances in Social Behavior Research,10,73-81.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Journal：Advances in Social Behavior Research

Volume number: Vol.10

ISSN：2753-7102(Print) / 2753-7110(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).