Research Article
Open access
Published on 25 September 2024
Download pdf
Wei,M. (2024). Adolescent Bedtime Rules: Legal Effects Under Customary Law and Discretion. Advances in Social Behavior Research,10,66-68.
Export citation

Adolescent Bedtime Rules: Legal Effects Under Customary Law and Discretion

Mingyao Wei *,1,
  • 1 HEFEI No.6 High School Cambridge International Center

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/10/2024095

Abstract

In daily life, children often get used to staying late or even staying up late because of the rebellion of adolescent psychology against the non-mandatory rules formulated by the family. To explore the legal effect of such rules, this article analyzes the regulation of bedtime according to customary law. The two criteria of discretion and strategic non-enforcement are used to support the reason why customary laws (incorporate the bedtime rule made by the parents) have real legal effects. Through legal case studies and the comparison and contraction of disobeying regulated bedtime, the author admits that such rules sometimes can be criticized, which jeopardizes the characteristics of enforcement and credibility for laws with certain unfairness and lack of enforcement. However, they can be refuted based on the progressive principle, the dynamic balance between rules and discretion, and another theoretical basis. Given the disputes raised in this paper, the author also put forward the corresponding improvement measures after each refutation. To put it in a nutshell, the author thinks that the family rules produced in the absence of hard punishment like the regulated bedtime.

Keywords

customary law, discretion, strategic non-enforcement,incremental adjustment strategy

[1]. Hart, H. L. A. The concept of law (2nd ed.). Retrieved from https://discoversocialsciences.com/wp-content/uploads/2018/08/The-Concept-of-Law-Second-Edition.-H.L.A.-Hart.pdf

[2]. Natural law and customary law. Retrieved from https://www.zaoerv.de/68_2008/68_2008_1_a_69_110.pdf

[3]. Bhe and others v. Khayelitsha Magistrate and others (CCT 49/03) [2004] ZACC 17; 2005 (1) SA 580 (CC); 2005 (1) BCLR 1 (CC) (15 October 2004). Retrieved from https://www.saflii.org/za/cases/ZACC/2004/17.html

[4]. Botha, C., & Bekink, B. (2018). Law reform in South Africa: 21 years since the establishment of a supreme constitutional dispensation. The Theory and Practice of Legislation, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1080/20508840.2018.1475904

[5]. Davis, K. C. (1979). Administrative law treatise (2nd ed.). Academic Press.

[6]. Schneider, C. E. The tension between rules and discretion in family law: A report and reflection. University of Michigan Law School Scholarship. Retrieved from https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/2297/

[7]. Fighting hate speech and fake news. Retrieved from https://www.medialaws.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/6.-Claussen.pdf

[8]. Hart, H. L. A. (2013, March 24). Discretion. Harvard Law Review. Retrieved from https://harvardlawreview.org/print/vol-127/discretion/

[9]. Lemos, S. (2004a). The effects of the minimum wage in the formal and informal sectors in Brazil. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.526023

[10]. Kanbur, R. (2009). Conceptualising informality: Regulation and enforcement. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1412264

[11]. Repository. https://repository.law.umich.edu/articles/2297/

[12]. Harrison, A. E., & Scorse, J. (2003). Globalization’s impact on compliance with labor standards. Brookings Trade Forum, 2004(1). https://doi.org/10.1353/btf.2004.0010

[13]. Blaesser, B. W. (1994). The abuse of discretionary power. Design Review, 42–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4615-2658-2_5

[14]. Tian, N. (2015). Research on the system of progressively raising the retirement age in China. Retrieved from https://175.178.223.144:8085/kcms2/article/abstract?v=gR09I6yibQ6kU1opAbC87QPxQhBMa1RzOatGplig86KVwBqRpMsqMUBYIOR5o8T37gjFsW0VCDro8stmpTZik4kiB87fPf7xKJR8PDaIrvXbX1bOqQde9i1Or4JaXqUxcVVWegvLVlIuEDfn36mXj8vyV4be&uniplatform=NZKPT&language=CHS

Cite this article

Wei,M. (2024). Adolescent Bedtime Rules: Legal Effects Under Customary Law and Discretion. Advances in Social Behavior Research,10,66-68.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Journal:Advances in Social Behavior Research

Volume number: Vol.10
ISSN:2753-7102(Print) / 2753-7110(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).