Download pdf
Exploring the Intersection of Psychology and Economics: Understanding Consumption Patterns and Decision-Making Behaviors among Low-Income Populations
- 1 Queen Mary University of London
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper combines psychology and economics to better comprehend consumption habits and decision-making among the low-income groups. The study employs a mixed methodology that includes surveys and behavioral experiments to look at the role that economic constraints and psychological conditions play in subsistence-level consumption decisions. The questionnaire gathers quantitative information about spending habits, financial planning and spending, and the experimental section modelled decision-making to see how people use limited resources. Key results show that low-income individuals prioritize short-term rather than long-term needs, have present bias, and make impulse decisions when stressed. And cognitive biases, like loss aversion and overconfidence, also impact decision-making in this population. These findings are significant for psychological and economic research, and they rebuke the rationality hypothesis in conventional economic models. The study also provides pragmatic advice to policymakers and corporations that the intervention needs to focus on both the mental obstacles to financial decision-making and the economic constraints of low-income people.
Keywords
Psychology, Economics, Low-Income Populations, Decision Making
[1]. Harré, M. S. (2021). Information theory for agents in artificial intelligence, psychology, and economics. Entropy, 23(3), 310. https://doi.org/10.3390/e23030310
[2]. Clark, J. M. (2024). Economics and Modern Psychology, I-II. In Classics in Institutional Economics, Part II, Volume 6 (pp. 44-105). Routledge.
[3]. El Keshky, M. E. S., Basyouni, S. S., & Al Sabban, A. M. (2020). Getting through COVID-19: The pandemic’s impact on the psychology of sustainability, quality of life, and the global economy–A systematic review. Frontiers in Psychology, 11, 585897. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.585897
[4]. Lu, J. G. (2020). Air pollution: A systematic review of its psychological, economic, and social effects. Current Opinion in Psychology, 32, 52-65. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copsyc.2019.07.012
[5]. Arenius, P., Autio, E., Wennberg, K., & Wuebker, R. (2021). The economic psychology of creating and venturing: a comparative behavioural portrait of artists and entrepreneurs. Small Business Economics, 57(2), 721-737. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11187-020-00332-4
[6]. Battisti, E., Alfiero, S., & Leonidou, E. (2022). Remote working and digital transformation during the COVID-19 pandemic: Economic–financial impacts and psychological drivers for employees. Journal of Business Research, 150, 38-50. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2021.07.022
[7]. Quenby, S., Farquharson, K., Quenby, E., & Farquharson, A. (2021). Miscarriage matters: the epidemiological, physical, psychological, and economic costs of early pregnancy loss. The Lancet, 397(10285), 1658-1667. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00396-2
[8]. Zychlinski, E., van Dick, R., Schuh, S. C., & Boos, M. (2021). Psychological distress and intention to leave the profession: The social and economic exchange mediating role. The British Journal of Social Work, 51(3), 816-830. https://doi.org/10.1093/bjsw/bcaa142
[9]. Newell, B. R., Lagnado, D. A., & Shanks, D. R. (2022). Straight choices: The psychology of decision making. Psychology Press.
[10]. Di Crosta, A., Di Leo, I., De Angelis, M., & Santinello, M. (2021). Psychological factors and consumer behavior during the COVID-19 pandemic. PloS one, 16(8), e0256095. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0256095
Cite this article
Wang,Z. (2025). Exploring the Intersection of Psychology and Economics: Understanding Consumption Patterns and Decision-Making Behaviors among Low-Income Populations. Advances in Social Behavior Research,15,44-48.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal：Advances in Social Behavior Research
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).