
Research on practical issues of “entrustment-type” fraud cases under Chinese Criminal Law
- 1 Beijing Zhongkai (Shanghai) Law Firm
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
“Entrustment-type” fraud, a criminal act wherein the entrustor seeks to achieve a specific objective by commissioning another party to handle matters, and the entrusted party, with the intent to illegally possess property, deceives the entrustor through fabricated facts or concealment of the truth, inducing the entrustor to dispose of property. In practice, such fraud often involves the entrusted party fabricating social connections, capabilities, progress of matters, or intended use of funds to defraud property. Judicial determination focuses on whether the entrusted party harbors the “intent to illegally possess.” Where evidence is insufficient, facts are unclear, or there is no intent to possess others’ property, even if false, exaggerated, or fraudulent conduct exists, it may not constitute this offense. Regarding post-incident property recovery, the legal nature of the defrauded property as non-loss property complicates recovery through criminal incidental civil procedures; while civil litigation is feasible, it carries significant risks. In criminal confiscation and restitution processes, the support for restitution claims and the scope of property compensation depend on factors such as the purpose of the entrustment and the manner of fund disposition.
Keywords
entrustment-type fraud, intent to illegally possess, crime of fraud
[1]. Sun, H. (2024). Judicial recognition of ‘intercepted bribery’ conduct. Journal of Shandong Judges Training College, (6), 116–129.
[2]. Xu, Y. Y. (2015). Dilemmas and solutions of the crime of accepting bribes by taking advantage of influence in judicial practice. Journal of Guangxi Administrative Cadre Institute of Politics and Law, 30(2), 64–70.
[3]. Yu, S. Y., & Feng, Y. M. (2023). Investigation strategies for ‘entrustment for services’ fraud cases—A practical proposal centered on ‘deceptive conduct’. Police Education, (10), 35–38.
[4]. Li, T. Z., & Wang, Z. (2024). Civil law regulation and judicial approaches to entrustment for school admissions—Based on a sample of 223 judgments. Administration and Law, (12), 82–95.
[5]. Chen, G. H. (2020). The private law characterization and judicial regulation of ‘paid entrustment’. Journal of China University of Political Science and Law, (6), 162–173.
Cite this article
Jin,B. (2025). Research on practical issues of “entrustment-type” fraud cases under Chinese Criminal Law. Advances in Social Behavior Research,16(3),77-80.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Journal:Advances in Social Behavior Research
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).