Epigenetic regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cells in exercise-induced injury repair

Research Article
Open access

Epigenetic regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cells in exercise-induced injury repair

Qinyuan Hu 1*
  • 1 Xiamen University Affiliated Keji High School    
  • *corresponding author 1767295475@qq.com
Published on 15 October 2024 | https://doi.org/10.54254/3029-0821/jfsnh.2024022
JFSNH Vol.3
ISSN (Print): 3029-083X
ISSN (Online): 3029-0821

Abstract

Individuals, ranging from the average person to athletes, face potential risks of exercise-related injuries. To explore the mechanisms of repair, it is imperative to focus on skeletal muscle, whose regeneration depends on a resident population of muscle stem cells known as satellite cells. Through meticulous experimentation and research, it has been revealed that epigenetic regulatory mechanisms, such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs, play a pivotal role in governing gene expression within skeletal muscle satellite cells. These findings underscore the significant impact of these regulatory processes in addressing exercise-induced injuries.

Keywords:

epigenetic regulation, skeletal muscle, satellite cells, repair, regeneration, epigenetic modification, DNA methylation, histone modifications, non-coding RNAs

Hu,Q. (2024). Epigenetic regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cells in exercise-induced injury repair. Journal of Food Science, Nutrition and Health,3,4-6.
Export citation

1. Introduction

Skeletal muscle possesses remarkable regenerative capacity, primarily due to a population of muscle stem cells called satellite cells. Located between the basal lamina and the sarcolemma of muscle fibers, these cells typically remain quiescent. However, upon stimuli such as exercise-induced injury, they can be activated to proliferate and differentiate into new muscle fibers, thereby repairing damaged tissue [1]. Recent research has shown that epigenetic regulation plays a crucial role in satellite cell function, particularly in the process of exercise-induced injury repair [2].

This report aims to explore the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms of skeletal muscle satellite cells and how these mechanisms influence muscle repair following exercise-induced injury. Understanding these regulatory mechanisms not only helps to reveal the molecular basis of muscle regeneration but may also provide important clues for developing new therapeutic strategies for exercise-related injuries and muscle diseases [3].

The significance of this research lies in its potential to enhance our understanding and control of the muscle regeneration process. Exercise-induced injury is a common problem affecting a wide range of individuals, from the general public to professional athletes. By gaining a deeper understanding of the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms of satellite cells, we may discover ways to accelerate muscle repair and reduce recovery time. Furthermore, these studies may provide new approaches for treating various muscle atrophies and degenerative diseases [4].

2. Background

The biological characteristics of skeletal muscle satellite cells and their role in muscle regeneration have been extensively studied [5]. These cells maintain their stem cell properties and activate when needed through the precise regulation of a series of transcription factors. Among these factors, the paired-box transcription factor Pax7 is considered key in maintaining the satellite cell population, while myogenic regulatory factors (MRFs) such as MyoD, Myf5, myogenin, and MRF4 play important roles in the activation, proliferation, and differentiation of satellite cells [6].

In recent years, epigenetic studies have revealed the importance of mechanisms such as DNA methylation, histone modifications, and non-coding RNAs in regulating gene expression [2,3]. These epigenetic modifications can influence chromatin structure, thereby regulating gene accessibility and expression levels without altering the DNA sequence itself. In muscle development and regeneration, these mechanisms have been shown to play crucial roles in regulating satellite cell function [4].

3. Content

3.1. Methodology

To investigate the epigenetic regulatory mechanisms of skeletal muscle satellite cells and their role in exercise-induced injury repair, researchers employed the following primary methods:

1. Isolation and purification of satellite cells from mouse skeletal muscle using cell-sorting techniques [7].

2. Analysis of histone modification profiles in satellite cells at both quiescent and activated states using ChIP-seq technology [3].

3. Comparison of transcriptomic differences between quiescent and activated satellite cells using RNA-seq technology [5].

4. Study of changes in chromatin accessibility using ATAC-seq technology [8].

5. Validation of the effects of specific epigenetic modifications on satellite cell function through in vitro culture and in vivo transplantation experiments [9].

6. Establishment of exercise-induced injury mouse models to study the dynamic changes in epigenetic regulation during muscle repair [1].

3.2. Procedure

The research team first isolated satellite cells from both normal mice and those with exercise-induced injury models. By comparing the epigenetic characteristics of these two groups of cells, they identified key epigenetic modifications associated with exercise-induced injury [3, 5].

Next, researchers conducted a detailed analysis of the epigenetic changes as satellite cells transitioned from a quiescent state to an activated state. They found that active marks such as H3K4me3 and H3K27ac significantly increased at gene loci related to muscle regeneration, while repressive marks such as H3K27me3 decreased [2, 3].

To validate the functional significance of these epigenetic modifications, researchers used small-molecule inhibitors or gene-editing techniques to interfere with specific epigenetic regulatory factors. They observed that disrupting certain histone methyltransferases or demethylases could significantly affect the proliferation and differentiation abilities of satellite cells [6].

Finally, researchers verified the physiological relevance of these findings in exercise-induced injury mouse models. They observed dynamic changes in epigenetic modification patterns during the repair process and influenced repair efficiency by regulating specific epigenetic factors [1, 9].

3.3. Findings

The main findings of this study include:

1. Quiescent satellite cells exhibit unique epigenetic characteristics, including widespread bivalent chromatin structures (simultaneously possessing activating and repressive marks) [3, 10].

2. The activation process of satellite cells is accompanied by large-scale epigenetic remodeling, especially in the promoter and enhancer regions regulating muscle-specific genes [2, 4].

3. The histone demethylase UTX plays a key role in satellite cell activation by activating myogenic genes through the removal of the repressive H3K27me3 mark [4].

4. DNA methylation levels generally decrease during satellite cell activation; however, methylation at certain specific sites is important for maintaining stem cell properties [3, 6].

5. Non-coding RNAs, especially long non-coding RNAs and miRNAs, play important roles in regulating satellite cell function [2].

6. During exercise-induced injury repair, epigenetic modifications exhibit dynamic change patterns, reflecting the functional states of satellite cells at different stages [1, 9].

4. Conclusion

This study reveals the important role of epigenetic regulation in skeletal muscle satellite cell function, especially in the process of exercise-induced injury repair [1, 2, 4]. The results indicate that the activation and differentiation processes of satellite cells involve complex epigenetic reprogramming, which precisely regulates changes in gene expression patterns [3, 5].

The bivalent chromatin structure identified in the study may keep satellite cells in a “standby” state, maintaining both stem cell properties and the ability to respond quickly to activation signals [3, 10]. This mechanism may explain how satellite cells maintain their regenerative potential during long-term quiescence.

The key role of histone-modifying enzymes such as UTX in satellite cell activation highlights that targeting these factors may be an effective strategy for regulating muscle regeneration [4, 6]. Similarly, the dynamic changes in DNA methylation also provide potential targets for developing new intervention methods [2, 3].

The role of non-coding RNAs in regulating satellite cell function is an emerging field of research [2]. These molecules may act as fine-tuners, coordinating complex gene expression networks. Future research may discover more non-coding RNAs that play key roles in muscle regeneration.

The dynamic changes in epigenetic modifications observed during exercise-induced injury repair provide a basis for developing time-specific intervention strategies [1, 9]. By regulating specific epigenetic factors at specific time points, it may be possible to achieve precise control over the repair process.

Overall, this project has not only advanced our comprehension of skeletal muscle regeneration but also laid the groundwork for the future development of novel strategies to enhance recovery from exercise-induced injuries and manage muscle diseases. It underscores the significance of fundamental research in propelling medical advancement while also serving as a reminder of the necessity for caution and sustained endeavor in translating laboratory discoveries into clinical applications.

In addition to advancing our understanding of skeletal muscle regeneration, this project has provided valuable insights into the development potential of new strategies for improving recovery from exercise-induced injuries and managing muscle diseases. The findings from this research have laid a solid foundation for future studies aimed at developing innovative treatments and therapies in the field of sports medicine and rehabilitation.

Furthermore, the significance of fundamental research in driving medical progress cannot be overstated. It is through rigorous scientific inquiry that we uncover the underlying mechanisms of disease and injury, ultimately leading to the development of more effective clinical interventions. This project serves as a reminder of the essential role basic science plays in shaping the future of healthcare.

However, it is important to approach translational research with caution and effort. While laboratory discoveries hold great promise, their successful translation into clinical practice requires careful consideration of safety, efficacy, and ethical implications. Only through continued dedication and collaboration between researchers, clinicians, and industry partners can these advancements be successfully brought to fruition for the benefit of patients worldwide.


References

[1]. Charge, S. B., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2004). Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiological Reviews, 84(1), 209-238.

[2]. Segalés, J., Perdiguero, E., & Muñoz-Cánoves, P. (2015). Epigenetic control of adult skeletal muscle stem cell functions. FEBS Journal, 282(9), 1571-1588.

[3]. Liu, L., Cheung, T. H., Charville, G. W., et al. (2013). Chromatin modifications as determinants of muscle stem cell quiescence and chronological aging. Cell Reports, 4(1), 189-204.

[4]. Dilworth, F. J., & Blais, A. (2011). Epigenetic regulation of satellite cell activation during muscle regeneration. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2(2), 18.

[5]. Machado, L., Esteves de Lima, J., Fabre, O., et al. (2017). In situ fixation redefines quiescence and early activation of skeletal muscle stem cells. Cell Reports, 21(7), 1982-1993.

[6]. Ryall, J. G., Dell’Orso, S., Derfoul, A., et al. (2015). The NAD+-dependent SIRT1 deacetylase translates a metabolic switch into regulatory epigenetics in skeletal muscle stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 16(2), 171-183.

[7]. Judson, R. N., Zhang, R. H., & Rossi, F. M. (2013). Tissue-resident mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in skeletal muscle: Collaborators or saboteurs? FEBS Journal, 280(17), 4100-4108.

[8]. Brack, A. S., & Rando, T. A. (2012). Tissue-specific stem cells: Lessons from the skeletal muscle satellite cell. Cell Stem Cell, 10(5), 504-514.

[9]. Blau, H. M., Cosgrove, B. D., & Ho, A. T. (2015). The central role of muscle stem cells in regenerative failure with aging. Nature Medicine, 21(8), 854-862.

[10]. Yin, H., Price, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2013). Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiological Reviews, 93(1), 23-67.


Cite this article

Hu,Q. (2024). Epigenetic regulation of skeletal muscle satellite cells in exercise-induced injury repair. Journal of Food Science, Nutrition and Health,3,4-6.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Journal:Journal of Food Science, Nutrition and Health

Volume number: Vol.3
ISSN:3029-0821(Print) / 3029-083X(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Charge, S. B., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2004). Cellular and molecular regulation of muscle regeneration. Physiological Reviews, 84(1), 209-238.

[2]. Segalés, J., Perdiguero, E., & Muñoz-Cánoves, P. (2015). Epigenetic control of adult skeletal muscle stem cell functions. FEBS Journal, 282(9), 1571-1588.

[3]. Liu, L., Cheung, T. H., Charville, G. W., et al. (2013). Chromatin modifications as determinants of muscle stem cell quiescence and chronological aging. Cell Reports, 4(1), 189-204.

[4]. Dilworth, F. J., & Blais, A. (2011). Epigenetic regulation of satellite cell activation during muscle regeneration. Stem Cell Research & Therapy, 2(2), 18.

[5]. Machado, L., Esteves de Lima, J., Fabre, O., et al. (2017). In situ fixation redefines quiescence and early activation of skeletal muscle stem cells. Cell Reports, 21(7), 1982-1993.

[6]. Ryall, J. G., Dell’Orso, S., Derfoul, A., et al. (2015). The NAD+-dependent SIRT1 deacetylase translates a metabolic switch into regulatory epigenetics in skeletal muscle stem cells. Cell Stem Cell, 16(2), 171-183.

[7]. Judson, R. N., Zhang, R. H., & Rossi, F. M. (2013). Tissue-resident mesenchymal stem/progenitor cells in skeletal muscle: Collaborators or saboteurs? FEBS Journal, 280(17), 4100-4108.

[8]. Brack, A. S., & Rando, T. A. (2012). Tissue-specific stem cells: Lessons from the skeletal muscle satellite cell. Cell Stem Cell, 10(5), 504-514.

[9]. Blau, H. M., Cosgrove, B. D., & Ho, A. T. (2015). The central role of muscle stem cells in regenerative failure with aging. Nature Medicine, 21(8), 854-862.

[10]. Yin, H., Price, F., & Rudnicki, M. A. (2013). Satellite cells and the muscle stem cell niche. Physiological Reviews, 93(1), 23-67.