Debunking the Myth of Obsolescence: Strategies for Digital Heritage Conservation

Chuqiu Li

doi:10.54254/2753-7102/8/2024060

Research Article

Open access

Published on 27 May 2024

Download pdf

Li,C. (2024). Debunking the Myth of Obsolescence: Strategies for Digital Heritage Conservation. Advances in Social Behavior Research,8,4-9.

Export citation

Debunking the Myth of Obsolescence: Strategies for Digital Heritage Conservation

Chuqiu Li *^,1,

¹ University of Lincoln

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7102/8/2024060

Abstract

This essay extensively explores the multifaceted challenges and complexities associated with preserving digital cultural heritage, using the BBC Domesday Project as a case study. It underscores the critical importance of meticulous planning, future-proofing, and proactive strategies in digital archival endeavors. Emphasizing the significance of adopting open standards and establishing clear data ownership provisions, the essay aims to mitigate risks of obsolescence and safeguard digital cultural heritage for future generations. Furthermore, it addresses the concept of obsolescence in digital preservation and proposes strategic recommendations to prevent potential catastrophic issues, ensuring sustained access and relevance over time. In addition, the document delves into the criteria for selecting materials for digitization, highlighting the importance of metadata infrastructure in digital archiving. It discusses the challenges associated with constructing digital cultural repositories and emphasizes the necessity of balancing various priorities, including cultural significance, rarity, fragility, research potential, accessibility, user-friendliness, and institutional objectives during the selection process. Moreover, the essay underscores the pivotal role of metadata in ensuring the longevity and accessibility of digital resources and archives. Overall, this essay serves as a comprehensive guide for cultural heritage institutions, offering valuable insights and recommendations for the preservation and interpretation of digital heritage objects.

Keywords

digital preservation, metadata, Dublin Core, EAD, MODS, digitizing heritage, authenticity, obsolescence

View pdf

References

[1]. Wood, M. (1999). Domesday. Ebury Press. Retrieved from http://books.google.ie/books?id=TW1nAAAAMAAJ&q=Domesday+A+Search+for+the+Roots+of+England&dq=Domesday+A+Search+for+the+Roots+of+England&hl=&cd=2&source=gbs_api

[2]. Data from BBC Domesday Project | The National Archives. (2009, August 12). Retrieved from https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C16160

[3]. Hessler, J. C. (2007, June 14). Archive Fever. Journal of Map and Geography Libraries. https://doi.org/10.1300/j230v03n02_05

[4]. Skeem, D. (2006). Digital Preservation in a Techno World: Issues Involved and Institutions Actively Participating. Preservation.

[5]. Finney, A. [no date]. BBC Domesday Project. Retrieved from https://www.atsf.co.uk/dottext/domesday.html.

[6]. BBC Domesday Project - Source code available - stardot.org.uk. (2017, October 14). Retrieved from https://stardot.org.uk/forums/viewtopic.php?t=13883

[7]. Data from BBC Domesday Project | The National Archives. (2009, August 12). Retrieved from https://discovery.nationalarchives.gov.uk/details/r/C16160

[8]. Balestrini, M., Bird, J., Marshall, P., Zaro, A., & Rogers, Y. (2014, April 26). Understanding sustained community engagement. Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems. https://doi.org/10.1145/2556288.2557323

[9]. Bhatt, P., Ahmad, A. J., & Roomi, M. A. (2016, June). Social innovation with open source software: User engagement and development challenges in India. Technovation, 52–53, 28–39. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.technovation.2016.01.004

[10]. Conway, P. (2000). Overview: Rationale for digitization and preservation. In M. Sitts (Ed.), Handbook for digital projects: A management tool for preservation and access. Retrieved February 20, 2001 from the World Wide Web: http://www.nedcc.org/digital/dighome.htm

[11]. Mckay. (2003). Digitization in an Archival Environment. Electronic Journal of Academic and Special Librarianship (Winter 2003), 4(1).

[12]. Pandey, R., & Kumar, V. (2020, April 1). Exploring the Impediments to Digitization and Digital Preservation of Cultural Heritage Resources: A Selective Review. Preservation, Digital Technology & Culture, 49(1), 26–37. https://doi.org/10.1515/pdtc-2020-0006

[13]. Goddard, J., & Armstrong, P. (1986). The 1986 Domesday Project. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 11(3), 290. Available at: http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/621789.

[14]. Husain, Noushad & Introduction,. (2010). Wiki: A Web Based Technology for Reflective, Collaborative and Constructive Learning in Higher Education. University News, AIU.

[15]. Besser, H. (2001). Digital preservation of moving image material. The Moving Image, 1(2), 39-55.

[16]. Hoopes, J. (1997). The future of the past: Archaeology and anthropology on the World Wide Web. Archives and Museum Informatics, 11(2), 87-105.

[17]. Schmidt, J., Drews, P., & Schirmer, I. (2016). End-users’ perspective on digitalization: A study on work order processing in the German banking industry.

[18]. Jenkinson, Hilary. (1965). A Manual of Archive Administration. London: Percy Lund, Humphries & Co. Ltd.

[19]. Beamsley, T. (1999). Securing digital image assets in museums and libraries: A risk management approach. Library Trends, 48(2), 358-78.

[20]. Beall, J. (2004), "Dublin Core: An Obituary", Library Hi Tech News, 21(8), 40-41. https://doi.org/10.1108/07419050410567399

[21]. Bountouri, L., & Gergatsoulis, M. (2009, August 31). Interoperability Between Archival and Bibliographic Metadata: An EAD to MODS Crosswalk. Journal of Library Metadata, 9(1–2), 98–133. https://doi.org/10.1080/19386380903095107

[22]. Library of Congress (LC) . (2002a). EAD Version 2002 official site. Retrieved December 13, 2008, from http://www.loc.gov/ead/index.html

[23]. W3C . (2006). Extensible Markup Language (XML) 1.0 (4th ed.). Retrieved December 13, 2008, from http://www.w3.org/TR/xml/

[24]. Guenther, R. S. (2003, January). MODS: The Metadata Object Description Schema. Portal: Libraries and the Academy, 3(1), 137–150. https://doi.org/10.1353/pla.2003.0006

[25]. Eichler, R., Giebler, C., Gröger, C., Hoos, E., Schwarz, H., & Mitschang, B. (2021, July 2). Enterprise-Wide Metadata Management. Business Information Systems, 269–279. https://doi.org/10.52825/bis.v1i.47

[26]. Sugimoto, S. (2014, January 2). Digital archives and metadata as critical infrastructure to keep community memory safe for the future – lessons from Japanese activities. Archives and Manuscripts, 42(1), 61–72. https://doi.org/10.1080/01576895.2014.893833

[27]. Cook, T. (1997). What is Past is Prologue: A History of Archival Ideas Since 1898, and the Future Paradigm Shift. Archivaria, 43, 17-63. Retrieved from https://archivaria.ca/index.php/archivaria/article/view/12175

[28]. Hirtle, P. B. (2003). Digital preservation and copyright.

[29]. Byers, F. R. (2003). Care and Handling of CDs and DVDs—A Guide for Librarians and Archivists. NIST Special Publication, 500(252), 1-40.

[30]. Steenbakkers, J. F. (2005). Digital archiving in the twenty-first century: Practice at the national library of the Netherlands. Library Trends, 54(1), 33-56.

[31]. Sternfeld, J. (2011, September 1). Archival Theory and Digital Historiography: Selection, Search, and Metadata as Archival Processes for Assessing Historical Contextualization. The American Archivist, 74(2), 544–575. https://doi.org/10.17723/aarc.74.2.644851p6gmg432h0

[32]. Pickover, Michele. (2014). “Patrimony, Power and Politics: Selecting, Constructing and Preserving Digital Heritage Content in South Africa and Africa”. Paper presented at the IFLA WLIC – Libraries, Citizens, Societies: Confluence for Knowledge Conference, Lyon, France, August 16–22.

[33]. Gertz, J. (2000). Selection for preservation in the digital age: An overview. Library Resources & Technical Services, 44(2), 97-104.

[34]. de Stefano, P. (2000). Selection for digital conversion. In A. Kenney & O. Rieger (Eds.), Moving theory into practice: Digital imaging for libraries and archives (pp. 11-23). Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.

[35]. Smith, Laurajane. (2009). “Class, Heritage and the Negotiation of Place.” Paper presented at the Missing out on Heritage: Socio-Economic Status and Heritage Participation Conference for English Heritage, London, March 23.

[36]. DC-dot. (n.d.). https://www.ukoln.ac.uk/metadata/dcdot/

[37]. Moss, M., & Currall, J. (2004). Digitisation: Taking stock1. Journal of the Society of Archivists, 25(2), 123–137. https://doi.org/10.1080/0037981042000271457

[38]. Rosenthal, D.S.H. (2010), "Format obsolescence: assessing the threat and the defenses", Library Hi Tech, 28(2), 195-210. https://doi.org/10.1108/07378831011047613

[39]. Cerf, V. G. (2011, June). Avoiding “Bit Rot”: Long-Term Preservation of Digital Information [Point of View]. Proceedings of the IEEE, 99(6), 915–916. https://doi.org/10.1109/jproc.2011.2124190

[40]. Kenney, A., & Rieger, O. (2000). Introduction: Moving theory into practice. In A. Kenney & O. Rieger (Eds.), Moving theory into practice: digital imaging for libraries and archives. Mountain View, CA: Research Libraries Group.

Cite this article

Li,C. (2024). Debunking the Myth of Obsolescence: Strategies for Digital Heritage Conservation. Advances in Social Behavior Research,8,4-9.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title:

Conference website:

ISBN：(Print) / (Online)

Conference date: 1 January 0001

Editor：

Series: Advances in Social Behavior Research

Volume number: Vol.8

ISSN：2753-7102(Print) / 2753-7110(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).