Download pdf
Critically discuss the relationship between higher education and employment: promises and issues
- 1 University College London
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This essay critically explores the complex relationship between higher education and employment in the UK. Against a backdrop of government-led expansion since the 1990s, higher education has increasingly been framed as a means to promote social mobility and meet the demands of a knowledge-based economy. Drawing on policy analysis and academic literature, this study examines three key government initiatives - the Aimhigher programme, Degree Apprenticeships, and the Augar Review - as case studies of policy interventions aimed at improving graduate employability and widening participation. The study finds that although these policies have expanded access to university education, they have had limited success in addressing structural inequalities and labour market challenges. It highlights how credential inflation, intensified by economic stagnation and rising graduate numbers, has diminished the labour market value of degrees and raised qualification thresholds. Furthermore, the study shows that social class, ethnicity, and gender continue to influence graduate outcomes, with disadvantaged students facing persistent barriers in elite university admissions, degree attainment, and access to high-paying jobs. The study concludes that while higher education policies aim to foster inclusion and employability, they often fail to disrupt deeply entrenched social inequalities. Addressing these issues requires a more holistic approach that aligns education policy with broader social and economic reforms.
Keywords
higher education, graduate employability, social inequality, credential inflation, UK education policy
[1]. Tight, M. (2009). The development of higher education in the United Kingdom since 1945. McGraw-Hill Education.
[2]. The Times (2024). Graduate Jobs Slashed as Accounting’s Big Four Feel the Squeeze. Available at: https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/graduate-jobs-slashed-as-accountings-big-four-feel-the-squeeze-m3rdzrxxj.
[3]. UK Parliament (2025). Higher education student numbers. Available at: https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/08-08-2024/sb269-higher-education-student-statistics/location
[4]. Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2025). UK Labour Market Overview: January 2025. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/employmentandlabourmarket/peopleinwork/employmentandemployeetypes/bulletins/uklabourmarket/january2025
[5]. Becker, G. S. (2009). Human capital: A theoretical and empirical analysis, with special reference to education. University of Chicago Press.
[6]. Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2025b). GDP quarterly national accounts, UK: July to September 2024. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/bulletins/quarterlynationalaccounts/julytoseptember2024
[7]. Tholen, G. (2015). What can research into graduate employability tell us about agency and structure?. Br. J. Sociol. Educ., 36(5), 766-784.
[8]. Department for Education and Skills. (2003). The future of higher education (Cm 5735). Her Majesty’s Stationery Office. https://publications.parliament.uk/pa/cm200203/cmselect/cmeduski/425/425.pdf
[9]. Department for Business, Innovation & Skills. (2010). Securing a sustainable future for higher education: An independent review of higher education funding and student finance (The Browne Report). https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/11444/7/10-1208-securing-sustainable-higher-education-browne-report_Redacted.pdf
[10]. Higher Education Funding Council for England. (2011). The end of Aimhigher: Evaluating its impact on widening participation in higher education. https://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20120118171948/http://www.hefce.ac.uk/widen/aimhigh/
[11]. Carpentier, V. (2021). Three stories of institutional differentiation: resource, mission and social inequalities in higher education. Policy Rev. High. Educ., 5(2), 197-241.
[12]. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE). (2016). Higher Education Indicators for Further Education Colleges. Available at: https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/25492/1/HEFCE2016_01.pdf
[13]. Carter, J., & Tubbs, N. (2019). Degree apprenticeships, the ‘joy of learning’ excellence framework, and the common good. Journal of Further and Higher Education, 43(1), 127-137.
[14]. Department for Education. (2018). Apprenticeship funding: How it works. Available at:https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/apprenticeship-levy-how-it-will-work/apprenticeship-levy-how-it-will-work#pay-apprenticeship-levy
[15]. UK Commission for Employment and Skills (UKCES). (2014). The Labour Market Story: The State of UK Skills. Available at: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/media/5a7d61deed915d269ba8a517/The_Labour_Market_Story-_The_State_of_UK_Skills.pdf?utm_source=chatgpt.com
[16]. Cullinane, C. & Doherty, K. (2020). Degree apprenticeships: levelling up? Making degree apprenticeships work for social mobility. Sutton Trust, https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/253073/bis-13-1175-future-of-apprenticeships-in-england-implementation-plan.pdf.
[17]. Daley, J., Coyle, J. & Dwyer, C. (2016). Sheffield Hallam University and Nestle: developing future leaders with CMDA. Higher Education, Skills and Work-Based Learning, 6(4), 370-377.
[18]. Mulkeen, J., Abdou, H. A., Leigh, J., & Ward, P. (2017). Degree and Higher Level Apprenticeships: an empirical investigation of stakeholder perceptions of challenges and opportunities. Studies in Higher Education, 44(2), 333–346. https://doi.org/10.1080/03075079.2017.1365357
[19]. Hordern, J., & Bishop, D. (2017). Degree apprenticeships: higher technical or technical higher (education)? http://www.gatsby.org.uk/uploads/education/reports/pdf/degree-apprenticeships-report.pdf
[20]. Dawson, S., & Osborne, A. (2020). Re-shaping built environment higher education: the impact of degree apprenticeships in England. Int. J. Constr. Educ. Res., 16(2), 102-116.
[21]. Office for National Statistics (ONS) (2020). GDP, UK regions and countries: October to December 2019. Available at: https://www.ons.gov.uk/economy/grossdomesticproductgdp/bulletins/gdpukregionsandcountries/octobertodecember2019
[22]. UK Parliament (2022). The Post-18 Education and Funding Review: Government conclusion. Available at: https://commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-briefings/cbp-9348/
[23]. Bourdieu, P. (2002). The forms of capital. In N. W. Biggart (Ed.), Readings in economic sociology (pp. 280-291). Blackwell Publishers.
[24]. Goyal, A., & Aneja, R. (2020). Artificial intelligence and income inequality: Do technological changes and worker’s position matter? J. Public Aff., 20(4), e2326.
[25]. Collins, R. (1979). The Credential Society: An Historical Sociology of Education and Stratification. New York: Academic Press.
[26]. Figueiredo, H., Biscaia, R., Rocha, V., & Teixeira, P. (2017). Should we start worrying? Mass higher education, skill demand and the increasingly complex landscape of young graduates’ employment. Stud. High. Educ., 42(8), 1401-1420.
[27]. Bathmaker, A. M., Ingram, N., Abrahams, J., Hoare, A., Waller, R., & Bradley, H. (2016). Higher education, social class and social mobility: The degree generation. Springer.
[28]. HESA (2024). Higher Education Student Statistics: UK, 2022/23 - Student numbers and characteristics. https://www.hesa.ac.uk/news/08-08-2024/sb269-higher-education-student-statistics/numbers
[29]. Department for Education. (2024). Graduate labour market statistics: 2023. https://explore-education-statistics.service.gov.uk/find-statistics/graduate-labour-markets
[30]. Green, F., & Zhu, Y. (2010). Overqualification, job dissatisfaction, and increasing dispersion in the returns to graduate education. Oxf. Econ. Pap., 62(4), 740-763.
[31]. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2024). Workers in England more likely to be overqualified than global peers. https://www.ft.com/content/f7b31c10-d0f3-4af2-a678-0a0bb8e235ab
[32]. Brown, P., Lauder, H., & Cheung, S. Y. (2020). The death of human capital?: Its failed promise and how to renew it in an age of disruption. Oxford University Press.
[33]. Archer, L., Hutchings, M., & Ross, A. (2003). Higher Education and Social Class: Issues of Exclusion and Inclusion (1st ed.). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203986943
[34]. MacLeod, J. (2009). Ain’t No Makin’ It: Aspirations and Attainment in a Low-Income Neighborhood (3rd ed.). Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
[35]. Bourdieu, P. (2003). Symbolic violence. In I. de Courtivron (Ed.), Beyond French feminisms: Debates on women, politics, and culture in France, 1981-2001 (pp. 23-26). Palgrave Macmillan.
[36]. Bourdieu, P. & Passeron, J.-C. (1990). Reproduction in education, society and culture. Cambridge: Sage.
[37]. Reay, D., Crozier, G., & Clayton, J. (2010). ‘Fitting in’ or ‘standing out’: Working-class students in UK higher education. Br. Educ. Res. J., 36(1), 107-124. https://doi.org/10.1080/01411920902878925
[38]. Pham, T., Soltani, B., & Singh, J. K. N. (2024). Employability capitals as essential resources for employment obtainment and career sustainability of international graduates. J. Furth. High. Educ., 48(4), 436-448.
[39]. Bukodi, E., & Goldthorpe, J. H. (2018). Social mobility and education in Britain: Research, politics and policy. Cambridge University Press.
[40]. Meuleman, R., & Kraaykamp, G. (2024). Cultural capital, network resources, and occupational attainment: a panel study on the intragenerational conversion of cultural resources. Eur. Sociol. Rev., 40(5), 887-902.
[41]. Laurison, D., & Friedman, S. (2016). The class pay gap in higher professional and managerial occupations. Am. Sociol. Rev., 81(4), 668-695.
[42]. Gillborn, D., Warmington, P., & Demack, S. (2018). QuantCrit: Education, policy, ‘big data’ and principles for a critical race theory of statistics. Race Ethn. Educ., 21(2), 158–179.
[43]. Reay, D., David, M. E., & Ball, S. J. (2005). Degrees of Choice: Social Class, Race and Gender in Higher Education. Trentham Books.
[44]. Universities UK. (2024). Opportunity, growth and partnership: A blueprint for change from the UK’s universities. Universities UK.
[45]. Higher Education Funding Council for England (HEFCE) (2018) Differences in student outcomes: The effect of student characteristics. https://dera.ioe.ac.uk/id/eprint/31412/
[46]. UK Government (2023). Entry rates into higher education. https://www.ethnicity-facts-figures.service.gov.uk/education-skills-and-training/higher-education/entry-rates-into-higher-education/latest/
[47]. Boliver, V. (2016). Exploring ethnic inequalities in admission to Russell Group universities. Sociology, 50(2), 247-266.
[48]. Lessard-Phillips, L., Boliver, V., Pampaka, M., & Swain, D. (2018). Exploring ethnic differences in the post-university destinations of Russell Group graduates. Ethnicities, 18(4), 496-517.
[49]. Bhopal, K. (2018). White privilege: The myth of a post-racial society (1st ed.). Policy Press.
[50]. Friedman, S., & Laurison, D. (2019). The class ceiling: Why it pays to be privileged. Policy Press.
[51]. Saeed, A. (2022). Education, aspiration and upward social mobility: Working-class British women. Springer International Publishing.
Cite this article
Luo,S. (2025). Critically discuss the relationship between higher education and employment: promises and issues. Advances in Social Behavior Research,16(3),70-76.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title:
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).