Download pdf
Cross-National Analysis of Differences in Student Reading Performance: Taking PISA 2022 as an Example
- 1 University of Macau
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This comparative study delves into the variations in student reading proficiency across nations as evidenced by the PISA 2022 data. Through the analysis of datasets from diverse countries, the study seeks to uncover patterns and discrepancies in reading performance. Key factors such as the education system, family background, and availability of learning resources are meticulously compared to ascertain their influence on reading proficiency. The study's findings reveal that disparities in reading abilities among students stem from a multitude of factors, rather than a singular cause. As a result, this study advocates for the implementation of interventions to address these disparities and ultimately enhance the reading proficiency of students globally. Firstly, policymakers should strive to create a more equitable environment for students' reading performance. Concurrently, resources must be allocated to bolster teacher training programs, thereby enhancing teaching standards and proficiency. Additionally, families need to enhance their involvement and support for children's reading progress. Finally, schools and teachers should employ more comprehensive assessment methods for students' reading achievements.
Keywords
Student Reading Performance, PISA, Cross-National Comparison, Difference Analysis
[1]. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Assessment and Analytical Framework. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
[2]. Elleman, A.M., & Oslund, E.L. (2019). Reading Comprehension Research: Implications for Practice and Policy. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 6(1), 3-11.
[3]. Albreiki, B., Zaki, N., & Alashwal, H. (2021). A Systematic Literature Review of Students’ Performance Prediction Using Machine Learning Techniques. Education Sciences, 11(9), 552.
[4]. Khalatbari-Soltani, S., Maccora, J., Blyth, F. M., Joannès, C., & Kelly-Irving, M. (2022). Measuring Education in the Context of Health Inequalities. International Journal of Epidemiology, 51(3), 701-708.
[5]. Parcerisa, L., Fontdevila, C., & Verger, A. (2020). Understanding the PISA Influence on National Education Policies: A Focus on Policy Transfer Mechanisms. International Perspectives on School Settings, Education Policy, and Digital Strategies. A Transatlantic Discourse in Education Research, 185-198.
[6]. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume I): The State of Learning and Equity in Education. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
[7]. OECD. (2023). PISA 2022 Results (Volume II): Learning During and From Disruption. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
[8]. Schleicher, A. (2023). Insights and Interpretations. Pisa 2022.
[9]. Yang, M., & Lee, H. J. (2022). Do School Resources Reduce Socioeconomic Achievement Gap? Evidence from PISA 2015. International Journal of Educational Development, 88, 102528.
[10]. Vázquez Cano, E., Hervás Gómez, C., Calle Cabrera, A.M.D.L., & López Meneses, E. (2020). Socio-Family Context and its Influence on Students’ PISA Reading Performance Scores: Evidence from Three Countries in Three Continents. Educational Sciences: Theory and Practice, 20(2), 50-62.
[11]. Garcia, E. (2016). The Need to Address Non-Cognitive Skills in the Education Policy Agenda. In Non-Cognitive Skills and Factors in Educational Attainment, 31-64).
[12]. Barber, A.T., & Klauda, S.L. (2020). How Reading Motivation and Engagement Enable Reading Achievement: Policy Implications. Policy Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 7(1), 27-34.
[13]. Ömür, Ç. (2020). Relationships between Students’ Socioeconomic Status, Parental Support, Students’ Hindering, Teachers’ Hindering, and Students’ Literacy Scores: PISA 2018. World Journal of Education, 10(4), 45-59.
[14]. Bakchich, J., Carré, A., Claes, N., & Smeding, A. (2023). The Moderating Role of Socioeconomic Status on the Relationship between Teacher Social Support and Sense of Belonging to School. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 93(1), 153-166.
[15]. Eccles, J.S., & Harold, R.D. (2013). Family Involvement in Children’s and Adolescents’ Schooling. In Family-school links, 3-34.
[16]. Das, J. (2022). How to Inculcate Reading Habits of Children in School Environment. International Journal of Information Library & Society, 11(1).
Cite this article
Liu,D. (2024). Cross-National Analysis of Differences in Student Reading Performance: Taking PISA 2022 as an Example. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,54,37-43.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 5th International Conference on Education Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).