Download pdf
A Cross-National Examination of Abortion Politics: Contrasting Perspectives in the United States and France
- 1 Tufts University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The debate surrounding abortion laws has been one of great prominence in current politics. While some nations take a strong stance against the accessibility of the practice, others view it as an essential protection of women's autonomy. The main objective of this paper is to perform a comparative analysis of both the historical and contemporary legal landscape of abortion within France and the United States. Throughout this paper, the examination of the evolution of abortion laws in both countries are laid against a backdrop of shifting societal values, cultural influences, and political dynamics. In the United States, the narrative of abortion laws is marked by intense ideological complications and complex legal battles that result from deep rooted societal divisions. In contrast, France’s progression leaned towards growing liberalization, strongly influenced by public health priorities and an emphasis on gender equity. Through delving into key legal decisions, political movements, and public relations, this paper aims to illustrate the shaping legal and cultural frameworks within the two nations shape their respective policies and practices surrounding the topic of abortion. This paper highlights the implications of these divergent approaches towards women’s reproductive autonomy, government health outcomes, and overarching societal norms. The comparative analysis of abortion within the two democracies seeks to provide insights into the underlying reasons for the stark differences in their approaches, striving to draw conclusions that may provide insight for future legal and policy initiatives in the realm of reproductive rights.
Keywords
France, United States, Abortion, Legal Analysis, Policy Reform
[1]. Maddow-Zimet, I., Guttmacher Institute, Gibson, C. (2024). Despite bans, number of abortions in the United States increased. Information on: https://www.guttmacher.org/2024/03/despite-bans-number-abortions-united-states-increased-2023
[2]. Chiu, D. W., Braccia, A., & Jones, R. K. (2024). Characteristics and circumstances of adolescents obtaining abortions in the United States. MDPI.
[3]. Adams, Greg D. (1997). Abortion: Evidence of an Issue Evolution. American Journal of Political Science, 41(3), 718-737.
[4]. Arceneaux, Kevin. (2002). Direct Democracy and the Link between Public Opinion and State Abortion Policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 2(4),372-87.
[5]. Shapiro, Ian. (2011). The Constitutional Politics of Abortion in the United States. The Real World of Democratic Theory, Princeton University Press.
[6]. Camobreco, John F., and Michelle A. Barnello. (2008). Democratic Responsiveness and Policy Shock: The Case of State Abortion Policy. State Politics & Policy Quarterly, 8(1),48-65.
[7]. Farahani, T. H. (n.d.). France’s path to legalizing abortion. University College Stockholm. Information on: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1763925/FULLTEXT01.pdf
[8]. Olszynko-Gryn J, Rusterholz C. (2019). Reproductive Politics in Twentieth-Century France and Britain. Med Hist, 63(2),117-133.
[9]. STETSON, DOROTHY M. “Abortion Law Reform in France.” Journal of Comparative Family Studies, vol. 17, no. 3, 1986, pp. 277–90. JSTOR, http://www.jstor.org/stable/41601489.
[10]. Knoppers, Bartha Maria, et al. (1990). Abortion Law in Francophone Countries. The American Journal of Comparative Law, 38(4),889-922.
[11]. Legal Information Institute. (n.d.). Undue burden. Legal Information Institute. Information on: https://www.law.cornell.edu/wex/undue_burden
[12]. Blackhhurst, A. B., & Anglès, P.-Y. (n.d.). France’s Roe v. Wade was the Bobigny trial of Marie-Claire Chevalier - The Washington Post. Washington Post. Information on: https://www.washingtonpost.com/history/2022/06/25/bobigny-trial-roe-wade-france/
[13]. Zarevich, E. (2022). The manifesto of the 343. Jstor Daily. Information on: https://daily.jstor.org/the-manifesto-of-the-343/
[14]. Unsafe abortion: A preventable danger. Doctors Without Borders - USA. (n.d.). Information on: https://www.doctorswithoutborders.org/latest/unsafe-abortion-preventable-danger.
Cite this article
Zeng,Z. (2024). A Cross-National Examination of Abortion Politics: Contrasting Perspectives in the United States and France. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,55,186-198.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on International Law and Legal Policy
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).