Research Article
Open access
Published on 7 April 2025
Download pdf
Lyu,X. (2025). The Impact and Implications of the "Double Reduction" Policy on Shadow Education under the Perspective of Educational Equity. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,86,21-27.
Export citation

The Impact and Implications of the "Double Reduction" Policy on Shadow Education under the Perspective of Educational Equity

Xinran Lyu *,1,
  • 1 Ningbo University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7048/2025.21807

Abstract

Shadow education, also known as private tutoring or supplementary education, has attracted increasing research attention in the past two decades. In an effort o promote equity in education, the Chinese government has implemented a "Double reduction" policy to normalize tutoring institution and moderate the strained atmosphere caused by the educational race. However, This policy may exacerbate rather than reduce educational inequality. So far, studies have systematically reviewed the literature on the impact of shadow education from the perspective of educational inequality is relatively scarce. Therefore, based on literature search method and interviews with 5 parents, this paper provide a comprehensive overview of the implications of the "Double reduction" policy on shadow education and summarizes the implications for future practice and research. Research has found that the policy has triggered new educational equity pitfalls, including a surge in covert tutoring, and an increase in anxiety among some families, in the context of the "scores-only" theory in the college entrance examination.

Keywords

shadow education, double reduction, education fairness, tutoring institution, private tutoring

[1]. Stevenson, D. L., & Baker, D. P. (1992). Shadow education and allocation in formal schooling: Transition to university in Japan. American Journal of sociology, 97(6), 1639-1657.

[2]. Bray, M. (2006). Private supplementary tutoring: Comparative perspectives on patterns and implications. Compare, 36(4), 515-530.

[3]. Baker, D. P., Akiba, M., LeTendre, G. K., & Wiseman, A. W. (2001). Worldwide shadow education: Outside-school learning, institutional quality of schooling, and cross-national mathematics achievement. Educational evaluation and policy analysis, 23(1), 1-17

[4]. Mori, I., & Baker, D. (2010). The origin of universal shadow education: What the supplemental education phenomenon tells us about the postmodern institution of education. Asia Pacific Education Review, 11, 36-48.

[5]. Peng, P. (2007). Shadow Education: Research on Extracurricular Tutoring Abroad and Its Implications. Foreign Primary & Secondary Education, (9).

[6]. Zhu, X. (2013). Shadow Education and the Dynamics of Cultural Capital: An Analysis. Contemporary Educational Science, (9), 6-8.

[7]. Shi, C., Li, W., & Chen, Y. (2022). Reflections on the Governance of Off-Campus Tutoring under the "Double Reduction" Policy: A Comparative Analysis of Shadow Education Policies in Japan and South Korea. Journal of Education and Teaching Research, 36(12), 66-78.

[8]. Wu, C., Zhang, J., & Wang, M. (2017). What Hinders Parental Involvement in Their Children’s Education: Class Differences, Selective Suppression by Schools, and Parental Participation. Educational Research, 38(1), 85-94.

[9]. An, G., & Yang, Y. (2018). A Study on the Impact of Parental Involvement from Families with Different Socioeconomic Status on Children’s Academic Achievement. Educational Development Research, 38(20), 17-24.

[10]. Pan, Y., Ning, K., & Zhu, Z. (2024). Has the Regulation of Shadow Education Exacerbated Urban-Rural Educational Inequality? A Case Study of the "Double Reduction" Policy. Journal of Shanghai Agriculture, (4), 110-116.

[11]. Zhang, W., & Bray, M. (2018). Equalising schooling, unequalising private supplementary tutoring: Access and tracking through shadow education in China. Oxford Review of Education, 44(2), 221-238.

[12]. Ding, Y., & Xue, H. (2022). The Status, Characteristics, and Influencing Factors of Parental Educational Anxiety: An Empirical Study Based on 35,162 Parents. Journal of Capital Normal University (Social Sciences Edition), (5), 145-156, 188.

[13]. Luo, Y., & Liu, Y. (2022). Parental Educational Anxiety under the "Double Reduction" Policy: Manifestations, Causes, and Coping Strategies. Education and Economy, 38(5), 67-73, 96.

[14]. Pekrun, R., Goetz, T., Titz, W., & Perry, R. P. (2002). Academic emotions in students' self-regulated learning and achievement: A program of qualitative and quantitative research. Educational psychologist, 37(2), 91-105.

Cite this article

Lyu,X. (2025). The Impact and Implications of the "Double Reduction" Policy on Shadow Education under the Perspective of Educational Equity. Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media,86,21-27.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Educational Innovation and Philosophical Inquiries

Conference website: https://2025.iceipi.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-971-7(Print) / 978-1-83558-972-4(Online)
Conference date: 20 August 2025
Editor:Kurt Buhring
Series: Lecture Notes in Education Psychology and Public Media
Volume number: Vol.86
ISSN:2753-7048(Print) / 2753-7056(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).