1. Introduction
The rapid growth of the electric vehicle (EV) industry, which saw an annual increase of over 35% in global sales, has made it a defining global trend of the twenty-first century. China has emerged as the world’s largest EV market, accounting for more than 60% of worldwide sales in 2023 [1]. This acceleration is fueled by a combination of industrial policy, fiscal incentives, and an underlying shift in consumer values toward smart, sustainable mobility [2]. As industry boundaries blur, technology firms are entering the automotive race. Xiaomi, a household name in smartphones and Internet of Things (IoT) devices, announced in 2021 a US$10 billion investment over ten years to establish an EV business, with CEO Lei Jun personally leading the venture [3]. Its first production vehicle, the SU7, launched in March 2024, immediately challenged incumbents such as Tesla and BYD on specifications and price [4]. Yet as a late mover, Xiaomi faces skepticism from both investors and consumers regarding its automotive credibility and execution capabilities. Marketing strategy—how the firm frames value, builds trust, and converts attention into sustained demand—therefore becomes central to its prospects [5,6]. This paper analyzes Xiaomi Auto’s strategy using the SWOT framework to assess internal and external determinants of performance, and the 4P marketing mix to examine tactical levers. Beyond the firm level, the analysis highlights implications for consumer welfare, employment shifts in traditional automakers, and the broader diffusion of intelligent mobility.
2. Brand introduction
Founded in 2010, Xiaomi built a reputation for delivering high-specification consumer electronics at accessible prices while cultivating an active community of users. By 2023, the company’s MIUI software ecosystem surpassed 640 million monthly active users, underscoring Xiaomi’s ability to acquire, retain, and cross-sell to a vast customer base [7]. The brand’s identity intertwines value, design, and openness: users are not merely purchasers but co-creators who offer feedback across forums and social media, contributing to rapid product iteration and unusually high loyalty. This community-centric model laid a foundation for Xiaomi’s most ambitious adjacency: the automotive sector. In March 2021, CEO Lei Jun announced Xiaomi’s entry into EVs as a long-horizon bet and the last major entrepreneurial undertaking of his career, signaling strategic commitment and personal accountability [3]. The company moved swiftly from declaration to execution. In March 2024, Xiaomi unveiled the SU7, a sporty pure-electric sedan positioned to blend intelligent connectivity with attainable performance. With a starting price of ¥215,900 (approximately US$29,800), the SU7 undercut Tesla’s Model 3 by roughly ¥30,000, while publicized specifications emphasized long range—up to 700 km under favorable test cycles—and an intelligent cockpit tightly integrated with Xiaomi’s broader ecosystem [4]. The launch combined conventional press events with digital-first tactics, including influencer collaborations, live broadcasts, and real-time audience engagement. Within 27 minutes, Xiaomi reported more than 50,000 pre-orders, a signal of price–performance resonance and effective demand activation [5]. By early 2025, cumulative deliveries surpassed 200,000, and management raised the full-year target to 350,000 units, indicating confidence in supply ramp-up and order conversion [8]. Distribution mirrored Xiaomi’s new retail playbook. The firm leveraged more than 12,000 physical retail touchpoints and its own e-commerce channels to showcase the vehicle alongside phones, wearables, and smart-home products; this omnichannel setup lowered search costs for prospective buyers and highlighted cross-device synergies [9]. Strategically, Xiaomi cast the car as an extension of digital life rather than a stand-alone appliance—an approach that reframes purchase criteria around experience continuity, ecosystem lock-in, and ongoing software value.
3. Marketing strategy analysis — SWOT
3.1. Strengths
Ecosystem integration is Xiaomi’s core strategic asset, as it enables seamless interaction between vehicles and other smart devices. HyperOS, the firm’s cross-device operating system, provides a technical substrate for seamless data and service continuity across phone, home, and vehicle. For car buyers, this manifests as convenient identity management, app portability, and unified voice/AI assistance; for Xiaomi, it creates switching costs and unlocks lifetime value well beyond the initial sale [9]. The firm’s installed base—over 500 million smartphone users—constitutes a uniquely addressable audience for automotive remarketing and cross-promotion, compressing customer acquisition costs relative to new entrants without such traffic advantages. From a brand perspective, Xiaomi’s founder-led communication model enhances authenticity. Lei Jun’s direct engagement on livestreams and social media provides narrative coherence and responsiveness that amplify trust formation during the credibility-building phase [6]. Financial and engineering inputs also support execution. Company disclosures and third-party analyses point to more than ¥10 billion in R&D investments for the EV initiative and a dedicated team of roughly 3,400 engineers [10]. Patent activity in drive units and battery management has already translated into prototype systems that enhance energy efficiency and safety. Finally, Xiaomi’s pricing philosophy—“flagship experience at an accessible price”—creates a powerful value proposition in a segment where consumers are highly sensitive to range, performance, and software features relative to price [5]. The ability to package long-range capability, an intelligent cockpit, and an attractive design at a price below key rivals is a distinctive strength in early market capture.
3.2. Weaknesses
The depth of automotive know-how remains Xiaomi’s most material internal constraint. Automotive manufacturing demands mastery of quality engineering, supply orchestration, and regulatory compliance accumulated over years and millions of road miles—capabilities that cannot be fully borrowed from consumer electronics. Initial customer reports of software instability and battery-related glitches—highlighted in several media reviews—risk magnifying concerns about safety and reliability in a category where trust is paramount [11]. Production learning curves can manifest as bottlenecks, panel fit variance, or service delays that erode early goodwill. A second weakness is positioning tension. Xiaomi’s legacy as a value brand in smartphones can complicate its ascent into the premium strata of automotive, where purchase criteria include perceived craftsmanship, NVH refinement, and long-run durability. Consumers who embrace Xiaomi’s phones for affordability may hesitate to ascribe premium safety and prestige attributes to a Xiaomi-branded car [4]. This identity gap requires careful management to avoid diluting either the mass-market franchise or the aspirational EV narrative. Finally, the after-sales footprint—parts logistics, certified repair capacity, mobile service—lags incumbents. Inadequate coverage or long turnaround times can depress satisfaction scores and amplify negative word-of-mouth during the critical launch window.
3.3. Opportunities
Policy tailwinds and technology convergence expand Xiaomi’s opportunity set. China’s multi-year commitment to new energy vehicles—through purchase incentives, license plate privileges, and infrastructure investment—continues to bolster demand [12]. On the demand side, preferences are migrating toward intelligent, connected vehicles with rapid over-the-air (OTA) improvement cycles, precisely where Xiaomi’s IoT expertise is most transferable [13]. The firm can monetize beyond the hardware sale by offering software subscriptions, premium navigation or entertainment, and cross-device bundles that integrate car, home, and mobile experiences. Geographically, Xiaomi is well positioned to expand into price-sensitive international markets that value technology-rich vehicles at accessible prices—Southeast Asia, parts of Eastern Europe, and Latin America—before attempting highly regulated, premium-skewed markets. Partnerships with local distributors or contract manufacturers could accelerate entry while mitigating fixed-cost burdens [14]. Moreover, as EVs become rolling computers, developer ecosystems and third-party apps may create network effects that strengthen Xiaomi’s moat. Curating a safe, quality-controlled app marketplace for the car—aligned with HyperOS—could become a durable differentiator.
3.4. Threats
Competitive intensity is the defining external risk. China’s EV arena features scale leaders (BYD, Tesla), agile challengers (NIO, XPeng, Li Auto), and technology consortia that compress innovation cycles and ignite frequent price wars [2]. Sustained undercutting can squeeze margins for value-positioned players like Xiaomi. Safety incidents—such as the SU7 fire reported in 2025—pose asymmetric reputational damage to a newcomer and can precipitate regulatory scrutiny or costly recalls [11]. Macroeconomic variables amplify uncertainty: battery input costs (lithium, nickel), exchange-rate volatility for imported components, and trade policy shifts affecting export plans. Finally, consumer skepticism toward a smartphone brand’s automotive competence remains a latent headwind [9]. Converting tech fandom into long-term automotive trust requires years of trouble-free operations, transparent communication, and consistent service excellence.
3.5. 4P marketing mix analysis
3.5.1. Product
Xiaomi positions the SU7 as a technology-forward EV that embeds into the user’s digital life. Core product attributes—long range, responsive acceleration, and an AI-augmented cockpit—are intentionally framed alongside ecosystem benefits rather than in isolation. HyperOS serves as the connective tissue, providing phone-to-car continuity for navigation, media, and personal profiles, and offering users a unified digital identity across devices. This architecture moves the discussion from horsepower to human–machine experience, narrowing evaluation gaps versus incumbents. Design choices emphasize modern, athletic styling, minimalistic interiors, and large-format displays. Regular OTA updates promise feature growth post-purchase, which not only addresses a key EV adoption driver—continuous software improvement—but also strengthens customer retention and enables a recurring revenue model. Relative to peers, Xiaomi’s product narrative is less about standalone performance leadership and more about orchestrated experience leadership. Looking ahead, portfolio expansion into SUVs and compact models would tap into China’s fastest-growing EV segments and attract more family-oriented consumers, while also enabling platform reuse and cost leverage. Partnerships in safety-critical domains (e.g., braking, ADAS sensors) can complement in-house software strengths to balance innovation with reliability [10].
3.5.2. Price
The SU7 adopts value-based pricing that undercuts key benchmarks while delivering high-specification content. With a starting price of ¥215,900 (≈US$29,800), Xiaomi positions the car well below the Tesla Model 3, creating a compelling entry point for tech-savvy, price-conscious buyers [4]. The pricing logic leverages Xiaomi’s historic promise—flagship-level experience at a mainstream price—and converts it into the automotive domain. However, persistent price wars in China’s EV market challenge this approach: lower sticker prices and promotional financing can compress contribution margins and reduce budget for after-sales and R&D [2]. Mitigations include versioning (good/better/best trims), software feature tiers sold as subscriptions, and limited-time bundles with IoT devices to boost perceived value without eroding cash margins. As production scales, learning-curve effects and supplier negotiations should lower unit costs, enabling selective reinvestment into service quality and brand-building. For exports, Xiaomi must localize price architecture to taxes, incentives, and consumer willingness to pay while avoiding overreliance on discounting that could weaken premium aspirations.
3.5.3. Place
Unlike traditional automakers that rely on third-party dealerships, Xiaomi combines direct digital sales with a vast retail footprint to maintain pricing control and a consistent brand experience. More than 12,000 Xiaomi retail locations provide high-traffic spaces for test vehicles, consultations, and ecosystem demonstrations—turning stores into experience centers [5]. The company’s e-commerce infrastructure supports end-to-end processes from configuration to deposit, mirroring consumer expectations set by its electronics business. This hybrid model reduces intermediation costs compared with traditional dealership networks and preserves control over pricing and brand experience. Operationally, Xiaomi must ensure that delivery centers, service hubs, and parts depots scale in step with sales to avoid bottlenecks that degrade satisfaction. In lower-tier cities where store coverage is thinner, mobile service vans and certified third-party shops can bridge gaps. Internationally, phased entry via local partners or online-first pilots can validate demand before heavy fixed investment. Data from both online and offline touchpoints should feed a unified CRM to support personalization, retention, and referral programs.
3.5.4. Promotion
Promotion blends Xiaomi’s internet-native playbook with automotive-specific trust-building. Pre-launch teasers, livestream keynotes, and influencer collaborations generated over 10 million online views, illustrating Xiaomi’s digital marketing efficiency. Scarcity cues—limited-time benefits or early-bird configurations—activate demand and social proof when supply is constrained. However, durable adoption in automotive hinges on reassurance: safety transparency, warranty clarity, crash-test communication, and third-party endorsements. Lei Jun’s personal brand is a force multiplier, but the message mix should progressively shift from personality-driven excitement to evidence-based reliability [6]. Tactically, test-drive roadshows, owner referral programs, and service experience storytelling can convert attention into trust. User-generated content—dashcam footage of ADAS performance, home-charging tutorials, OTA feature demonstrations—extends promotion into authentic advocacy. Finally, aligning promotions with festival periods and local incentives can improve conversion efficiency without resorting to aggressive price cuts. Beyond generating hype, Xiaomi must systematize trust conversion. Clear disclosures on warranty coverage, proactive recall communications, and independent safety certifications should be embedded into promotional messaging. Public dashboards that highlight OTA updates and reliability statistics would provide transparency and reassure skeptical buyers. This dual strategy—hype plus assurance—can turn initial curiosity into durable trust.
4. Recommendations
First, institutionalize quality and safety as the anchor of Xiaomi Auto’s narrative. Establish a tiered supplier audit system to ensure quality control and signal accountability, expand end-of-line testing, and publish periodic safety and reliability bulletins that address common owner questions in plain language [10]. Partner with reputable testing bodies for independent evaluations and make OTA changelogs fully transparent to build compounding trust. Second, scale delivery and service in lockstep with sales. Open more delivery hubs in high-demand regions, deploy mobile service fleets in under-served areas, and invest in technician training and spare-parts logistics to bring repair turnaround below competitive benchmarks [2]. Third, refine positioning to bridge value and premium. Adopt a barbell strategy: maintain an accessible core trim for volume while offering halo variants that showcase design, materials, and advanced driver assistance. Use experiential marketing—track days, design exhibitions, engineering “open labs”—to demonstrate craftsmanship beyond spec sheets [9]. Fourth, monetize software responsibly. Offer optional feature bundles (e.g., enhanced navigation, advanced parking, premium audio) tailored to different user segments, such as tech enthusiasts or family-oriented drivers. Also provide family subscriptions that extend beyond the car to phones and smart homes, but avoid gating basic safety features behind paywalls. Fifth, stage international expansion pragmatically. Pilot in Southeast Asian markets where Xiaomi’s brand is strong, regulatory barriers are moderate, and younger consumers show high adoption of connected devices [14]. Localize charging partnerships, finance options, and after-sales promises before scaling to Europe. Finally, invest in a developer ecosystem around HyperOS for the car—SDKs, documentation, and a curated in-car app store—which can generate differentiated experiences and new revenue without heavy hardware costs. Taken together, these actions translate the insights from SWOT and 4P into a coherent program that compounds trust, efficiency, and differentiation over time. In parallel, Xiaomi should deploy a robust data-driven owner engagement framework. This could include regular Net Promoter Score (NPS) tracking, segmented satisfaction surveys, and transparent reporting of service KPIs. Closing the loop by showcasing how feedback translates into tangible improvements would build credibility and foster a participatory community ethos aligned with Xiaomi’s brand heritage.
5. Conclusion
Xiaomi’s entry into the EV market illustrates how a technology firm can reframe competition and challenge the dominance of traditional automakers by leveraging ecosystem thinking, design-led experiences, and pricing agility. The SWOT analysis shows that powerful assets—HyperOS integration, a massive user base, founder-led communication, and sustained R&D—coexist with material challenges in manufacturing maturity, positioning, and service depth. The 4P analysis clarifies where tactical levers reside: product orchestration around the digital lifestyle, disciplined value-based pricing, omnichannel distribution, and promotion that evolves from hype to proof. If Xiaomi converts these insights into operational discipline—particularly in quality, after-sales excellence, and transparent communication—it can transform early enthusiasm into durable loyalty. Beyond a single brand, the case underscores a broader shift: as vehicles become software-defined, entrants from outside the automotive incumbency can compete credibly by leveraging ecosystems and data. The implications extend to consumers and society through increased choice, greener transport options, and enhanced digital inclusion.
References
[1]. Tian, J., & Zhang, L. (2024). Overview of Chinese new energy vehicle industry and policy developmet. Green Energy and Resources, 100075. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.gerr.2024.100075
[2]. Zhang, T., Burke, P. J., & Wang, Q. (2024). Effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies in China: A three-dimensional panel study. Resource and Energy Economics, 76, 101424. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2023.101424
[3]. Horwitz, J. (2021, March 30). Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi to invest $10 billion in new EV unit over 10 years. Reuters. https: //www.reuters.com
[4]. Wu, S., & Mo, Y. (2024, March 29). Xiaomi takes aim at Tesla in Chinese auto market with $29, 870 electric car. Reuters. https: //www.reuters.com
[5]. Mao, T. (2025). Analysis of Xiaomi Auto’s marketing strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 186, 76–82. Atlantis Press. https: //doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.BL23677
[6]. Hu, X. (2025). Analysis of Xiaomi's Marketing Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 158, 156-161. https: //direct.ewa.pub/proceedings/aemps/article/view/19765
[7]. Liang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2023). The impact of Xiaomi’s marketing strategy on consumers’ purchase intention. BCP Business & Management, 38, 942–949. https: //doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3800
[8]. Xue, Y. (2025, March 18). Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun sees progress as firm lifts 2025 EV deliveries target by 16%. South China Morning Post. https: //www.scmp.com
[9]. Wang, Q., Fan, X., Fu, Z., & Wang, J. (2025). From smartphones to electric cars: A multidimensional analysis of Xiaomi’s brand extension and consumer perceptions. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 33(5), 685–706. https: //doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2025.2520318
[10]. Ding, R., Chen, B., Wilson, J. M., Yan, Z., & Huang, Y. (2023). SRNI-CAR: A comprehensive dataset for analyzing the Chinese automotive market. arXiv preprint. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2401.05395
[11]. Business Wire. (2024, October 4). Xiaomi Auto’s first car a success, but shortcomings remain. Business Wire. https: //www.businesswire.com
[12]. Chen, Y., Dai, X., Fu, P., Luo, G., & Shi, P. (2024). A review of China's automotive industry policy: Recent developments and future trends. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 11(5), 867-895. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2024.09.001
[13]. Liu, L. (2024). Cross-market innovation: The dynamics of latecomer EV entrants. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 19(2), 85–101. https: //doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2024.2361281
[14]. Zheng, X. (2025). Analysis of New Energy Vehicle Marketing Strategy-Taking Xiaomi as an Example. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 218, p. 01008). EDP Sciences. https: //doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521801008
Cite this article
Chen,S. (2025). Xiaomi Auto Marketing Strategy: SWOT and 4P Analysis. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences,245,1-7.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of ICFTBA 2025 Symposium: Data-Driven Decision Making in Business and Economics
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Tian, J., & Zhang, L. (2024). Overview of Chinese new energy vehicle industry and policy developmet. Green Energy and Resources, 100075. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.gerr.2024.100075
[2]. Zhang, T., Burke, P. J., & Wang, Q. (2024). Effectiveness of electric vehicle subsidies in China: A three-dimensional panel study. Resource and Energy Economics, 76, 101424. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2023.101424
[3]. Horwitz, J. (2021, March 30). Chinese smartphone maker Xiaomi to invest $10 billion in new EV unit over 10 years. Reuters. https: //www.reuters.com
[4]. Wu, S., & Mo, Y. (2024, March 29). Xiaomi takes aim at Tesla in Chinese auto market with $29, 870 electric car. Reuters. https: //www.reuters.com
[5]. Mao, T. (2025). Analysis of Xiaomi Auto’s marketing strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 186, 76–82. Atlantis Press. https: //doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2025.BL23677
[6]. Hu, X. (2025). Analysis of Xiaomi's Marketing Strategy. Advances in Economics, Management and Political Sciences, 158, 156-161. https: //direct.ewa.pub/proceedings/aemps/article/view/19765
[7]. Liang, Y., Zhou, Y., & Zhu, Z. (2023). The impact of Xiaomi’s marketing strategy on consumers’ purchase intention. BCP Business & Management, 38, 942–949. https: //doi.org/10.54691/bcpbm.v38i.3800
[8]. Xue, Y. (2025, March 18). Xiaomi CEO Lei Jun sees progress as firm lifts 2025 EV deliveries target by 16%. South China Morning Post. https: //www.scmp.com
[9]. Wang, Q., Fan, X., Fu, Z., & Wang, J. (2025). From smartphones to electric cars: A multidimensional analysis of Xiaomi’s brand extension and consumer perceptions. Journal of Strategic Marketing, 33(5), 685–706. https: //doi.org/10.1080/0965254X.2025.2520318
[10]. Ding, R., Chen, B., Wilson, J. M., Yan, Z., & Huang, Y. (2023). SRNI-CAR: A comprehensive dataset for analyzing the Chinese automotive market. arXiv preprint. https: //arxiv.org/abs/2401.05395
[11]. Business Wire. (2024, October 4). Xiaomi Auto’s first car a success, but shortcomings remain. Business Wire. https: //www.businesswire.com
[12]. Chen, Y., Dai, X., Fu, P., Luo, G., & Shi, P. (2024). A review of China's automotive industry policy: Recent developments and future trends. Journal of Traffic and Transportation Engineering (English Edition), 11(5), 867-895. https: //doi.org/10.1016/j.jtte.2024.09.001
[13]. Liu, L. (2024). Cross-market innovation: The dynamics of latecomer EV entrants. Journal of Technology Management & Innovation, 19(2), 85–101. https: //doi.org/10.1080/13602381.2024.2361281
[14]. Zheng, X. (2025). Analysis of New Energy Vehicle Marketing Strategy-Taking Xiaomi as an Example. In SHS Web of Conferences (Vol. 218, p. 01008). EDP Sciences. https: //doi.org/10.1051/shsconf/202521801008