Download pdf
A Quantitative Exploration: Weibo Users’ Perception of Trolling
- 1 The Open University of Harbin
- 2 Kings College London
- 3 Guangdong University Of Foreign Studies
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Online trolling has caused multiple concerning social issues within the past decade, thus receiving significantly rising attention from both academia and the public. Nevertheless, not only are there differences when researchers define trolling, but also there is a gap between academic definitions of online trolling and users’ interpretations of online trolling. To this end, this research conducted an online survey and recruited 193 Weibo users to explore how they define online trolling quantitatively, how they perceive trolling behavior, and how online trolling influences them. After analyzing, mainly cross-filtering, the collected data, this research found that Weibo users’ definition of online trolling is considerably broad. Even though most participants had negative emotional responses to being trolled, few experienced behavioral changes. Moreover, senior Weibo users’ trolling intentions are more defensive than those who have been Weibo users for a shorter time.
Keywords
social media, user perception, trolling, definition
[1]. Huang, K. (2023, March 28). Zheng Linghua: The 23 Years Old Girl with Pink Hair is Gone, but Trolls are Still Here. BBC News (Chinese). https://www.bbc.com/zhongwen/simp/chinese-news-65095783
[2]. Schwartz, M. (2008, August 3). The trolls among us. The New York Times. https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/03/magazine/03trolls-t.html
[3]. Vogels, E. A. (2021, January 13). The State of Online Harassment. Pew Research Center: Internet, Science & Tech. https://www.pewresearch.org/internet/2021/01/13/the-state-of-online-harassment/
[4]. Donath J. S. (1999). Identity and deception in the virtual community. In Smith M. A., Kollock P. (Eds.), Communities in cyberspace (pp. 29–59). Routledge.
[5]. Kim M.-S., Raja N. S. (1991, May 23–27). Verbal aggression and self-disclosure on computer bulletin boards [Paper presented]. 41st Annual Meeting of the International Communication Association, Chicago, IL, United States. https://files.eric.ed.gov/fulltext/ED.pdf334620
[6]. Hardaker C. (2010). Trolling in asynchronous computer-mediated communication: From user discussions to academic definitions. Journal of Politeness Research, 6(2), 215–242. https://doi.org/10.1515/JPLR.2010.011
[7]. Ortiz, S. M. (2020). Trolling as a Collective Form of Harassment: An Inductive Study of How Online Users Understand Trolling. Social Media + Society, 6(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305120928512
[8]. Herring S. C. (1999). The rhetorical dynamics of gender harassment online. The Information Society, 15(3), 151–167.
[9]. Gray K. L. (2012). Deviant bodies, stigmatized identities, and racist acts: Examining the experiences of African-American gamers in Xbox Live. New Review of Hypermedia and Multimedia, 18(4), 261–276. https://doi.org/10.1080/13614568.2012.746740
[10]. Gray K. L., Buyukozturk B., Hill Z. G. (2017). Blurring the boundaries: Using Gamergate to examine “real” and symbolic violence against women in contemporary gaming culture. Sociology Compass, 11(3), Article e12458.
[11]. Vera-Gray F. (2017). Talk about a cunt with too much idle time: Trolling feminist research. Feminist Review, 115(1), 61–78. https://doi.org/10.1057/s41305-017-0038-y
[12]. Buckels E. E., Trapnell P. D., Paulhus D. L. (2014). Trolls just want to have fun. Personality and Individual Differences, 67, 97–102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.016
[13]. Phillips W. (2015). This is why we can’t have nice things: Mapping the relationship between online trolling and mainstream culture. MIT Press.
[14]. Sanfilippo M. R., Fichman P., Yang S. (2018). Multidimensionality of online trolling behaviors. The Information Society, 34(1), 27–39. https://doi.org/10.1080/01972243.2017.1391911
[15]. Golf-Papez, M., & Veer, E. (2017). Don’t feed the trolling: rethinking how online trolling is being defined and combated. Journal of Marketing Management, 33(15-16), 1336-1354.
[16]. March, & Marrington, J. (2019). A Qualitative Analysis of Internet Trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior and Social Networking, 22(3), 192–197. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2018.0210
[17]. Brubaker, P. J., Montez, D., & Church, S. H. (2021). The Power of Schadenfreude: Predicting Behaviors and Perceptions of Trolling Among Reddit Users. Social Media + Society, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/20563051211021382
[18]. March, E., & Steele, G. (2020). High esteem and hurting others online: Trait sadism moderates the relationship between self-esteem and internet trolling. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking, 23(7), 441–446. https://doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2019.0652
[19]. Dahlberg, L. (2001). Computer-mediated communication and the public sphere: A critical analysis. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 7(1). doi:10.1111/j.1083-6101.2001.tb00137.x
[20]. McAloon, J. (2015, September 30). Why do celebrities like Lena Dunham leave Twitter? Telegraph. Retrieved from http://www.telegraph.co.uk/culture/tvandradio/11537494/Why-do-celebritiesleave-Twitter.html
[21]. NetSafe. (2012, February 24). Submission on NZLC IP27: The news media meets “new media”: rights, responsibilities and regulation in the digital age. Retrieved from http://www.lawcom.govt.nz/sites/default/fifiles/submissionAttachments/39%20NetSafe.pdf
[22]. Berger, J., Sorensen, A. T., & Rasmussen, S. J. (2010). Positive effects of negative publicity: When negative reviews increase sales. Marketing Science, 29(5), 815–827. doi:10.1287/mksc.1090.0557
[23]. Galov, N. (n.d.). 19+ Weibo Statistics: Is it bigger than twitter in 2023?. WebTribunal. https://webtribunal.net/blog/weibo-statistics/#gref
[24]. Miles, M. B., Huberman, A. M., & Saldana, J. (2014). Qualitative data analysis: A method sourcebook. SAGE.
[25]. Li, K. (2021). Government Work Report. https://www.gov.cn/zhuanti/2021lhzfgzbg/index.htm
[26]. Hong, F.-Y., & Cheng, K.-T. (2018). Correlation between university students’ online trolling behavior and online trolling victimization forms, current conditions, and personality traits. Telematics and Informatics, 35(2), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2017.12.016
[27]. Fichman, P., & McClelland, M. W. (2020). The impact of gender and political affiliation on trolling. First Monday, 26(1). https://doi.org/10.5210/fm.v26i1.11061
[28]. Akhtar, S., & Morrison, C. M. (2019). The prevalence and impact of online trolling of UK members of Parliament. Computers in Human Behavior, 99, 322–327. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2019.05.015
[29]. Mihaylov, T., Koychev, I., Georgiev, G., & Nakov, P. (2021). Exposing paid opinion manipulation trolls. arXiv preprint arXiv:2109.13726.
Cite this article
Xu,S.;Chen,Z.;Yuan,W. (2024). A Quantitative Exploration: Weibo Users’ Perception of Trolling. Communications in Humanities Research,28,282-294.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).