
Research on the Design of Cross-Cultural Symbols from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics
- 1 Liaoning Petrochemical University
- 2 Liaoning Petrochemical University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
In the information age, symbols serve as fundamental tools of communication, and their design and application have become significant areas within modern communication science. According to Saussure, symbols are representative signs of objects, expressing specific content and meaning through particular forms. This study explores the mechanisms and principles of symbols in information dissemination through literature reviews and case analyses, emphasizing their roles in cultural transmission, cognition, and behavioral patterns. With the acceleration of globalization and digitization, symbol design faces new challenges and opportunities, especially with the advancement of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies pushing symbol design towards automation and intelligence. Furthermore, cross-cultural design of symbols requires consideration of adaptability and effectiveness in varying cultural, social, and technological contexts. This research proposes strategies for cultural sensitivity and adaptability in symbol dissemination across different cultures, aiming to provide new perspectives for semiotics theory and offer scientific guidance and strategies for symbol design practices in fields such as advertising, brand management, media production, and user interface design, thus enhancing effective global information dissemination and cultural exchange.
Keywords
Semiotics, Information Dissemination, Cross-Cultural Design, Artificial Intelligence
[1]. Domínguez M A M. Unravelling design intelligence: from semiotics to aesthetics[J]. Journal of Design Research, 2022, 20(3): 230-242.
[2]. Rudloff M, Kjærboe R. The legacy and future of Saussurean semiology in the study of art and visual communication[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies, 2022, 8(1): 123-132.
[3]. Polidoro P. Image schemas in visual semiotics: Looking for an origin of plastic language[J]. Cognitive Semiotics, 2019, 12(1): 20192006.
[4]. Zhao C. A Study on the Usability of Semiotics in Graphic Design[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2017, 1(000).
[5]. Danesi M. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet[M]. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.
[6]. Hu R B, Zhang X S. Research on Application of Symbol Typesin Design and Semiotics[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 971: 2721-2724.
[7]. Ayaydın A. EVRENSEL DİL VE SEMBOLLER DÜNYASI: GÖRSEL SANATLAR[J]. Fine Arts, 2012, 7(3): 258-268.
[8]. Bobrie F. Visual representations of goods and services through their brandings: The semiotic foundations of a language of brands[J]. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 2018, 33(3): 122-144.
[9]. Hoye L F, Kaiser R. Branding a symbol: context and meaning across cultures[J]. 2007.
[10]. Shinar D, Dewar R E, Summala H, et al. Traffic sign symbol comprehension: a cross-cultural study[J]. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(15): 1549-1565.
[11]. Piamonte D P T, Abeysekera J D A, Ohlsson K. Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001, 27(6): 399-404.
[12]. Dutz J, Schlimm D. Babbage’s guidelines for the design of mathematical notations[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2021, 88: 92-101.
[13]. Guo Y. Design of artistic graphic symbols based on intelligent guidance marking system[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(6): 4255-4266.
[14]. Jia X, Dong Y, Wang B. Logo design process and method of intellectual property big data in the digital media era[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 2022.
[15]. Marres N. Communities at a crossroads: material semiotics for online sociability in the fade of cyberculture: by Annalisa Pelizza, Amsterdam, Institute for Network Cultures, 2018, 225 pp., freely downloadable, ISBN: 978-94-92302-25-0[J]. 2021.
Cite this article
Dai,W.;Liu,H. (2024). Research on the Design of Cross-Cultural Symbols from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics. Communications in Humanities Research,38,109-115.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).