Research on the Design of Cross-Cultural Symbols from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics

Research Article
Open access

Research on the Design of Cross-Cultural Symbols from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics

Wei Dai 1* , Haoyu Liu 2
  • 1 Liaoning Petrochemical University    
  • 2 Liaoning Petrochemical University    
  • *corresponding author 80160174@qq.com
CHR Vol.38
ISSN (Print): 2753-7072
ISSN (Online): 2753-7064
ISBN (Print): 978-1-83558-497-2
ISBN (Online): 978-1-83558-498-9

Abstract

In the information age, symbols serve as fundamental tools of communication, and their design and application have become significant areas within modern communication science. According to Saussure, symbols are representative signs of objects, expressing specific content and meaning through particular forms. This study explores the mechanisms and principles of symbols in information dissemination through literature reviews and case analyses, emphasizing their roles in cultural transmission, cognition, and behavioral patterns. With the acceleration of globalization and digitization, symbol design faces new challenges and opportunities, especially with the advancement of artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies pushing symbol design towards automation and intelligence. Furthermore, cross-cultural design of symbols requires consideration of adaptability and effectiveness in varying cultural, social, and technological contexts. This research proposes strategies for cultural sensitivity and adaptability in symbol dissemination across different cultures, aiming to provide new perspectives for semiotics theory and offer scientific guidance and strategies for symbol design practices in fields such as advertising, brand management, media production, and user interface design, thus enhancing effective global information dissemination and cultural exchange.

Keywords:

Semiotics, Information Dissemination, Cross-Cultural Design, Artificial Intelligence

Dai,W.;Liu,H. (2024). Research on the Design of Cross-Cultural Symbols from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics. Communications in Humanities Research,38,109-115.
Export citation

1. Introduction

In the era of information technology, symbols are not only basic tools of communication; their widespread design and application have become crucial areas of study in modern communication science. Defined by Saussure as representative signs that express specific content and meanings through certain forms, symbols are extensively used in communication studies, ranging from basic text and images to complex multimedia and virtual reality. Symbols not only convey information but also carry cultural meanings that influence people's cognition and behavioral patterns. As globalization and digitization accelerate, the design and dissemination of symbols face new challenges and opportunities. Designers must consider the adaptability and effectiveness of symbols in different cultural, social, and technological contexts. Moreover, as artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies evolve, symbol design is increasingly moving towards automation and intelligence, posing new demands on traditional semiotic theories and practices[1]. Therefore, studying the application of semiotics in communication processes not only helps optimize information transmission efficiency and effectiveness but also deepens our understanding of cultural exchanges and technological interactions. This research is of significant theoretical and practical value to fields such as advertising, brand management, media production, and user interface design.

This study aims to delve into symbol design under the purview of communication semiotics, using literature reviews and case analyses to understand the mechanisms and principles of symbols in modern information dissemination. By examining the theoretical foundations and practical applications of symbol design, it seeks to offer new perspectives for the development of semiotics theory and provide scientific guidance and strategies for practical symbol design.

2. Foundations of Semiotics Theory

2.1. History and development of semiotics

Semiotics, the study of signs and their roles in human societies, originated in the late 19th century. Initially focusing on linguistic signs, this field has expanded to encompass a broad range of symbol systems, evolving into a multidisciplinary area of study. Ferdinand de Saussure and Charles Sanders Peirce were seminal theorists in early semiotics.

Saussure's work emphasized the arbitrariness of the sign, a concept that challenged the traditional view of a direct connection between signs and their referents, instead proposing that signs are products of social conventions[2]. Peirce’s approach, from a logical perspective, categorized signs into three types: indexes, which are connected to their objects by direct or causal relationships (like smoke indicating fire); icons, which resemble their objects (such as a map representing its area); and symbols, which are purely conventional (such as the word "cat" representing all cats). Peirce’s classification has enhanced our understanding of how signs function in various contexts, significantly impacting the analysis of modern media, advertising, and online communication.

2.2. Classification and Function of Symbols

In semiotics, signs can be classified by their functions and modes of use. Fundamental categories include linguistic signs, visual signs, and digital and new media signs.

Linguistic signs, encompassing spoken and written language, convey information through structured linguistic systems. These signs are direct and prevalent forms of human communication, used to express specific ideas and abstract concepts. Visual signs convey information through visual elements such as graphics, colors, and layouts, which are indispensable in advertising and brand design[3]. For instance, corporate logos and brand colors not only help consumers identify brands but also communicate brand values and culture. The power of visual signs lies in their ability to quickly convey emotions and resonate with audiences, crucial in marketing and public information dissemination[4]. Digital and new media signs cover symbols used in various electronic and online platforms, including data codes, icons, buttons, and interactive interfaces that play key roles in modern communication and information technologies. These signs facilitate intuitive interaction with software and websites, such as the universally recognizable trash can icon for deletion functions. New media signs, specifically designed for creation, sharing, and interaction on digital platforms, include emojis, GIFs, videos, and social media hashtags. These symbols not only simplify and enrich communication but also help users express emotions and attitudes across cultural contexts, enhancing the efficiency and vividness of communication[5]. Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR) in symbols, such as navigational cues, interactive interfaces, and virtual objects, offer novel interactive experiences by overlaying information in users’ views or creating immersive environments.

2.3. Symbols and Information Dissemination

Symbols play a critical role in the process of information dissemination, acting as bridges between information senders and receivers. They not only transmit information but also shape how information is understood and interpreted. Effective symbol design greatly enhances the efficiency and quality of information dissemination, ensuring that messages are accurately conveyed across different cultures and contexts[6].

In the context of globalization, cross-cultural symbol design is particularly crucial. Due to the varying interpretations that different cultures may have of the same symbols, designers need to possess a high degree of cultural sensitivity and understanding to prevent miscommunications and cultural offenses. With the rapid development of digital technology, the forms and functions of symbols in information dissemination are continually evolving. The proliferation of digital media and the internet has diversified the types and uses of symbols, such as emojis, GIFs, click reactions, and share buttons on social media, which have greatly enriched communication methods, offering more intuitive and interactive ways to communicate. Moreover, the real-time update and feedback mechanisms of these symbols provide immediate insights into audience emotions and reactions, offering valuable instant feedback to communicators to adjust their content or dissemination strategies accordingly.

In this context, semiotics not only offers methods to understand and analyze how symbols work across various communication media but also provides tools to help us design more effective communication strategies. By studying the relationship between symbols and information dissemination in depth, we can better manage the flow of information in complex social and technological environments, enhancing communication efficiency and effectiveness. Additionally, semiotics research aids in improving the inclusiveness and accessibility of information, ensuring that people from diverse backgrounds and abilities can effectively receive and understand messages, thereby facilitating the spread of knowledge and overall societal progress[7].

3. Principles and Applications of Symbol Design

3.1. Visual Symbol Design

Visual symbols, the most widely used type of symbols in information dissemination, attract viewers' visual attention and convey messages through elements such as graphics, colors, and layouts. When designing visual symbols, the pursuit of aesthetics is important, but it is more crucial to ensure the clarity and efficiency of message transmission, ensuring that symbols effectively communicate the intended information and guide audience actions[8].

Table 1: Principles of Visual Symbol Design

Principle

Definition

conciseness

Simplicity Complex designs can make it difficult for viewers to understand, while simple symbols are more easily accepted and remembered by the public.

consistency

Consistency Includes the uniformity of colors, fonts, and graphic styles, as well as maintaining consistent interpretations across different scenarios.

acculturation

Cultural Adaptability Designers should research the acceptance and meanings of specific symbols, colors, and patterns in target cultures.

accessibility

Ensures that all potential users, including those with visual impairments, can effectively receive information.

In visual symbol design, simplicity is a key principle. Not only is it easily accepted by the public, but it is also easy to remember. For example, road traffic signs generally use simple and clear graphics to ensure they can be quickly recognized even when driving at high speeds. The consistency of visual symbols includes the uniformity of color, font, and graphic style, as well as their consistent presentation across various media and environments. Consistency not only enhances a brand’s professional image but also strengthens brand recognition. For instance, Apple’s logo maintains consistency across all its products and advertising, enhancing its recognizability[9]. Visual symbol design must consider the huge potential differences in how different cultures interpret colors, patterns, and shapes. Designers should conduct thorough cultural background research to ensure that their designs are correctly interpreted and do not cause misunderstandings or offenses in different cultures. Using high-contrast color combinations and clear fonts can improve the readability of symbols, making information transmission more universal and effective. For example, public signage uses large fonts and strong contrast colors to ensure that people from a distance and those with poor vision can clearly identify the signs.

Table 2: Case Analysis of Visual Symbols

Visual Symbol

Definition

/word/media/image1.png

(https://www.apple.com/)

The design of the Apple logo cleverly utilizes negative space to create a distinctive shape.

/word/media/image2.png

(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/London_Underground)

The red circle and blue bar are instantly recognizable, efficiently conveying the location of subway entrances.

Through these principles and cases, we see that visual symbol design involves more than aesthetics; it's about effectively, clearly, and sensitively conveying information while considering the needs and cultural backgrounds of various audience groups to achieve the best communication results[10].

3.2. Language Symbol Design

Language symbols, whether spoken or written, form the foundation of human communication, conveying information, expressing emotions, and guiding behavior through structured language systems. In information dissemination, the design of language symbols is crucial as it directly affects how information is received, understood, and responded to[11]. Effective language symbol design should ensure clarity, accuracy, and impact of the message.

Table 3: Principles of Language Symbol Design

Principle

Definition

information transfer

Information Transmission Language symbols are the most direct tools for conveying specific information.

expression of emotions

Emotional Expression Language not only transmits information but can also express emotions.

behavior guidance

Behavioral Guidance Language symbols are used in laws, rules, and directives, demonstrating their role in guiding behavior.

Table 4: Visual Symbol Definition

Visual Symbol

Definition

"Just Do It"

"Just Do It" The Nike slogan is concise and effectively conveys the brand's spirit of supporting personal challenges.

Safety warning sign

Safety Warning Signs In safety signs and warning labels, the choice of words needs to be direct and easy to understand.

3.3. Digital and New Media Symbol Design

Digital symbols play a key role in modern communication and information technologies, including data coding and interface symbols[12]. Digital symbols in information technology include coding systems, with binary coding in computers and the Internet being a common form of digital symbols. They represent various instructions and data through sequences of zeros and ones. User interface symbols in software and websites enable intuitive interaction with tech products, such as the universally recognized trash can icon for deletion functions.

Innovative designs in new media symbols include Augmented Reality (AR) and Virtual Reality (VR). In AR applications, symbol design must be clear in the real-world visual environment. In VR environments, designers need to create symbols that naturally interact with users. These symbols guide user actions and enhance the immersive experience, such as directional cues or feedback signals in VR games. Additionally, symbols in social media, such as emojis, dynamic emoticons, hashtags, and “like” buttons, have become indispensable parts of online communication. These symbols not only simplify and enrich communication methods but also help users express emotions and attitudes across cultural contexts, making communication more efficient and vivid.

In summary, we see the diverse applications and importance of symbols in modern information dissemination[13]. Effective symbol design not only enhances the efficiency of information transmission but also deepens the emotional depth and cultural breadth of communication. This chapter not only provides a theoretical framework for understanding symbol design principles but also demonstrates these principles in practice through specific cases.

4. Challenges and Strategies of Cross-Cultural Symbol Design

Cross-cultural symbol design is an inevitable challenge for global brands and products. Effective symbol design must transcend language and cultural barriers to ensure that audiences worldwide can accurately understand and positively respond. First, the interpretation of the same symbol can vary dramatically across cultures. Certain symbols may have positive connotations in one culture but negative or offensive meanings in another. For example, colors, animals, or gestures can have vastly different symbolic meanings across cultures. Secondly, while global brands strive for a consistent brand image worldwide, they must also adjust symbols to meet the specific needs and preferences of local markets. Furthermore, as the digital age progresses, symbols need to be effectively transmitted across various technological platforms, such as different screen sizes and operating systems, which may affect how symbols are displayed and interpreted[14]. Lastly, culture is dynamic; changes in social values and trends can affect the acceptance and effectiveness of symbols[15].

To address these challenges, this paper proposes four strategies corresponding to the issues. First, conduct extensive cultural research. Before designing symbols, undertake broad cultural background research to understand the potential meanings of symbols in target cultures. Collaborate with local designers or cultural consultants to ensure that symbol design considers local cultural sensitivities and characteristics. Secondly, design a core brand symbol to serve as a basis for global recognition, while creating adaptive variants for different markets to reflect local cultural traits. Develop flexible brand guidelines that allow for adjustments within certain limits in different regions to meet local market needs. Thirdly, consider the adaptability of symbols on various devices and interfaces to ensure consistency and readability across all platforms. Adopt responsive design principles to ensure symbols perform consistently across different resolutions and devices. Lastly, regularly evaluate and update. Periodically assess the cultural relevance and effectiveness of symbols, updating them as necessary to reflect cultural changes. Stay closely attuned to cultural trends and societal changes, anticipating factors that might affect symbol acceptance and adjusting design strategies accordingly.

Through these strategies, designers can better address the challenges of cross-cultural symbol design, creating symbols that are both globally appealing and culturally appropriate. This not only enhances the brand’s global consistency but also establishes deeper cultural connections and recognition in local markets. In today’s increasingly globalized world, effective cross-cultural symbol design is key to business success.

5. Conclusion and Outlook

In this study, we explored the central role of symbols as tools of communication in modern society, as well as the challenges and opportunities symbol design faces in the context of diverse cultures and rapidly advancing technology. Symbols are not only mediums for information transmission but also bridges for cultural exchange, playing a crucial role in shaping people’s cognition and behavioral patterns. As globalization and digitization advance, symbol design and dissemination must become more refined and sensitive to adapt to the changing social and technological landscape. Especially in a cross-cultural context, symbol design must not only convey clear information but also consider cultural diversity and sensitivity. Additionally, the rapid development of artificial intelligence and machine learning has introduced new research directions and design methods in symbol design, presenting unprecedented challenges to traditional semiotics theory and practice.

The future of semiotics is expected to play an increasingly critical role against the backdrop of accelerated globalization, particularly as artificial intelligence and machine learning technologies evolve, fundamentally transforming the methods and tools of symbol design. Intelligent design tools, capable of predicting the cultural acceptability of symbols through data analysis, will optimize their universality and adaptability. Moreover, cross-cultural symbol design will become a focus of research and practice, necessitating in-depth exploration of different cultural interpretations of symbols, emphasizing the cultivation of cultural sensitivity and international perspectives in design education. Future research in semiotics will not only focus on technological and aesthetic advancements but also delve deeper into the societal and cultural roles of symbols, exploring how symbols can promote inclusiveness and dialogue worldwide, building a more understanding and respectful world.


References

[1]. Domínguez M A M. Unravelling design intelligence: from semiotics to aesthetics[J]. Journal of Design Research, 2022, 20(3): 230-242.

[2]. Rudloff M, Kjærboe R. The legacy and future of Saussurean semiology in the study of art and visual communication[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies, 2022, 8(1): 123-132.

[3]. Polidoro P. Image schemas in visual semiotics: Looking for an origin of plastic language[J]. Cognitive Semiotics, 2019, 12(1): 20192006.

[4]. Zhao C. A Study on the Usability of Semiotics in Graphic Design[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2017, 1(000).

[5]. Danesi M. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet[M]. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.

[6]. Hu R B, Zhang X S. Research on Application of Symbol Typesin Design and Semiotics[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 971: 2721-2724.

[7]. Ayaydın A. EVRENSEL DİL VE SEMBOLLER DÜNYASI: GÖRSEL SANATLAR[J]. Fine Arts, 2012, 7(3): 258-268.

[8]. Bobrie F. Visual representations of goods and services through their brandings: The semiotic foundations of a language of brands[J]. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 2018, 33(3): 122-144.

[9]. Hoye L F, Kaiser R. Branding a symbol: context and meaning across cultures[J]. 2007.

[10]. Shinar D, Dewar R E, Summala H, et al. Traffic sign symbol comprehension: a cross-cultural study[J]. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(15): 1549-1565.

[11]. Piamonte D P T, Abeysekera J D A, Ohlsson K. Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001, 27(6): 399-404.

[12]. Dutz J, Schlimm D. Babbage’s guidelines for the design of mathematical notations[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2021, 88: 92-101.

[13]. Guo Y. Design of artistic graphic symbols based on intelligent guidance marking system[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(6): 4255-4266.

[14]. Jia X, Dong Y, Wang B. Logo design process and method of intellectual property big data in the digital media era[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 2022.

[15]. Marres N. Communities at a crossroads: material semiotics for online sociability in the fade of cyberculture: by Annalisa Pelizza, Amsterdam, Institute for Network Cultures, 2018, 225 pp., freely downloadable, ISBN: 978-94-92302-25-0[J]. 2021.


Cite this article

Dai,W.;Liu,H. (2024). Research on the Design of Cross-Cultural Symbols from the Perspective of Communication Semiotics. Communications in Humanities Research,38,109-115.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development

ISBN:978-1-83558-497-2(Print) / 978-1-83558-498-9(Online)
Editor:Rick Arrowood
Conference website: https://www.icllcd.org/
Conference date: 27 April 2024
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.38
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).

References

[1]. Domínguez M A M. Unravelling design intelligence: from semiotics to aesthetics[J]. Journal of Design Research, 2022, 20(3): 230-242.

[2]. Rudloff M, Kjærboe R. The legacy and future of Saussurean semiology in the study of art and visual communication[J]. Language and Semiotic Studies, 2022, 8(1): 123-132.

[3]. Polidoro P. Image schemas in visual semiotics: Looking for an origin of plastic language[J]. Cognitive Semiotics, 2019, 12(1): 20192006.

[4]. Zhao C. A Study on the Usability of Semiotics in Graphic Design[J]. International Journal of Technology Management, 2017, 1(000).

[5]. Danesi M. The semiotics of emoji: The rise of visual language in the age of the internet[M]. Bloomsbury Publishing, 2017.

[6]. Hu R B, Zhang X S. Research on Application of Symbol Typesin Design and Semiotics[J]. Advanced Materials Research, 2014, 971: 2721-2724.

[7]. Ayaydın A. EVRENSEL DİL VE SEMBOLLER DÜNYASI: GÖRSEL SANATLAR[J]. Fine Arts, 2012, 7(3): 258-268.

[8]. Bobrie F. Visual representations of goods and services through their brandings: The semiotic foundations of a language of brands[J]. Recherche et Applications en Marketing (English Edition), 2018, 33(3): 122-144.

[9]. Hoye L F, Kaiser R. Branding a symbol: context and meaning across cultures[J]. 2007.

[10]. Shinar D, Dewar R E, Summala H, et al. Traffic sign symbol comprehension: a cross-cultural study[J]. Ergonomics, 2003, 46(15): 1549-1565.

[11]. Piamonte D P T, Abeysekera J D A, Ohlsson K. Understanding small graphical symbols: a cross-cultural study[J]. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 2001, 27(6): 399-404.

[12]. Dutz J, Schlimm D. Babbage’s guidelines for the design of mathematical notations[J]. Studies in History and Philosophy of Science, 2021, 88: 92-101.

[13]. Guo Y. Design of artistic graphic symbols based on intelligent guidance marking system[J]. Neural Computing and Applications, 2023, 35(6): 4255-4266.

[14]. Jia X, Dong Y, Wang B. Logo design process and method of intellectual property big data in the digital media era[J]. Discrete Dynamics in Nature and Society, 2022, 2022.

[15]. Marres N. Communities at a crossroads: material semiotics for online sociability in the fade of cyberculture: by Annalisa Pelizza, Amsterdam, Institute for Network Cultures, 2018, 225 pp., freely downloadable, ISBN: 978-94-92302-25-0[J]. 2021.