References
[1]. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1994). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. Soundscapes. info, 2.
[2]. Anderson, J.F. (2013). The gospel according to merit: From virtue to rationality to production. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 16(4), 449-464
[3]. Young, M. D. (1959). The rise of the meritocracy, 1870-2033: The new elite of our social revolution. Random House.
[4]. Formula 1. Spotrac.com. (n.d.). Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://www.spotrac.com/formula1/
[5]. Light, R., & Kirk, D. (2001). Australian cultural capital-rugby's social meaning: Physical assets, social advantage and independent schools. Culture, Sport, & Society, 4, 81-98.
[6]. Stoddart, B. (2006). Cricket, social formation and cultural continuity in Barbados: A preliminary ethnohistory. Sport in Society, 9, 762-789
[7]. Majumdar, B. (2003). Cricket in India: Representative playing field to restrictive preserve. Culture, Sport, & Society, 6, 169-189.
[8]. Baert, P., & Da Silva, F. C. (2010). Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. Polity.
[9]. Ladbrooke R (2013) First day of school, 5 February. Available at: www.jobinf1.com/2013/02/05/first-day-of-school/
[10]. Jenkins M (2010) Technological discontinuities and competitive advantage: A historical perspective on Formula 1 Motor Racing, 1950–2006. Journal of Management Studies 47(5): 884–910.
[11]. Mick, D. G., & Buhl, C. (1992). A meaning-based model of advertising experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 317-338.
Cite this article
Cambrie,C. (2023). Spend to Drive: Meritocracy, Anomie, and the Culture Industry within Formula One. Communications in Humanities Research,4,7-12.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies (ICIHCS 2022), Part 2
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Adorno, T., & Horkheimer, M. (1994). The culture industry: Enlightenment as mass deception. Soundscapes. info, 2.
[2]. Anderson, J.F. (2013). The gospel according to merit: From virtue to rationality to production. International Journal of Organization Theory and Behavior, 16(4), 449-464
[3]. Young, M. D. (1959). The rise of the meritocracy, 1870-2033: The new elite of our social revolution. Random House.
[4]. Formula 1. Spotrac.com. (n.d.). Retrieved May 25, 2022, from https://www.spotrac.com/formula1/
[5]. Light, R., & Kirk, D. (2001). Australian cultural capital-rugby's social meaning: Physical assets, social advantage and independent schools. Culture, Sport, & Society, 4, 81-98.
[6]. Stoddart, B. (2006). Cricket, social formation and cultural continuity in Barbados: A preliminary ethnohistory. Sport in Society, 9, 762-789
[7]. Majumdar, B. (2003). Cricket in India: Representative playing field to restrictive preserve. Culture, Sport, & Society, 6, 169-189.
[8]. Baert, P., & Da Silva, F. C. (2010). Social theory in the twentieth century and beyond. Polity.
[9]. Ladbrooke R (2013) First day of school, 5 February. Available at: www.jobinf1.com/2013/02/05/first-day-of-school/
[10]. Jenkins M (2010) Technological discontinuities and competitive advantage: A historical perspective on Formula 1 Motor Racing, 1950–2006. Journal of Management Studies 47(5): 884–910.
[11]. Mick, D. G., & Buhl, C. (1992). A meaning-based model of advertising experiences. Journal of Consumer Research, 19, 317-338.