Research Article
Open access
Published on 31 July 2024
Download pdf
Shi,Y. (2024). Comparison Between English and Mandarin Vowel Systems and the Challenges for Chinese Learners of English. Communications in Humanities Research,44,73-79.
Export citation

Comparison Between English and Mandarin Vowel Systems and the Challenges for Chinese Learners of English

Yiliu Shi *,1,
  • 1 Beijing University of Chinese Medicine

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/44/20240027

Abstract

In contemporary China, learning English has been considered as a must for almost all students, with the pronunciation acquisition usually being the initial focus. Among the phonetic elements, the mastery of vowel pronunciation is particularly crucial in that vowels are an essential element of language. Due to its great importance, numerous studies have comparatively analyzed the English and Mandarin vowel systems and experimentally listed the challenges Chinese English learners may face. Based on these analysis, feasible measures to handle the problems posed for Chinese learners are proposed. This paper collects and concludes logically the main discoveries and theories that have been raised by former scholars, with the aim of clearly presenting the disparities between the vowel systems of the two languages, illustrating the difficulties those differences may bring about, and sharing some approaches in which teachers can help their students to get out of the way. Despite the similarities and differences between the two vowel systems, which can lead to pronunciation errors, strategies such as meticulous comparison and immediate correction can aid students in getting rid of these obstacles. Therefore, this paper is of significant value in elucidating the difficulties encountered by Chinese students in learning English pronunciation and in outlining effective pedagogical strategies for teaching pronunciation.

Keywords

English Vowel System, Mandarin Vowel System, English Teaching, Second Language Acquisition

[1]. George Yule. (2000). The study of Language. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press. 48.

[2]. Zhang, Jinsheng. (2002). A Comparative Study of English and Chinese Vowels and Its Pedagogical Significance. Journal of PLA University of Foreign Language, 25(01), 56-59.

[3]. McMahon, A. (2002) An introduction to English Phonology, Edinburgh University Press

[4]. Li L. (2010). A Comparison of Chinese and English vowel systems and Their Effect on Teaching. Modern Communication, 298(11), 37+36

[5]. Chen Yu.(2023).A Contrastive Study of English and Mandarin Vowel Systems and Its Implications for TESOL.October 2023Communications in Humanities Research 8(1):160-165

[6]. Wang, J. (2008) A Comparative Analysis of English and Chinese Monophthong. Modern Chinese (Language Research Edition) (06), 99-101.

[7]. Li, J., Shi, F. (2008) Construction of Chinese-English Interlanguage Sound System, Experimental Study on English Vowel Pronunciation by Chinese Students. Proceedings of the 8th Chinese Phonetic Academic Conference and the International Symposium on Frontiers of Phonetic Science to Celebrate Mr. Wu Zongji's Centenary Birthday, 544-548.

[8]. Shang, C.Y., Bu, Y.H. (2009) Error Analysis of English Vowels Based on Experimental Phonetics. Journal of Tianshui Normal University, 135-137.

[9]. Wang, Shuyue. (2020). The Influence of Negative Transfer of Native Language on English Phonetic Learning of College Students and its Countermeasures. English on Campus, 516(24), 26-27.

[10]. Lu, Feng. (2006). The “Chinese-flavored English” Caused by the Difference of English and Chinese Phonetic Systems and its Countermeasures. College English (Academic Edition), 2006(02), 3-7.

Cite this article

Shi,Y. (2024). Comparison Between English and Mandarin Vowel Systems and the Challenges for Chinese Learners of English. Communications in Humanities Research,44,73-79.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Art, Design and Social Sciences

Conference website: https://2024.icadss.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-635-8(Print) / 978-1-83558-636-5(Online)
Conference date: 18 October 2024
Editor:Enrique Mallen
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.44
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).