Abstract
This essay explores the evolution, technological innovation, and visual expression of facades and envelopes in modern architecture through the lens of three seminal case studies: Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, Mies van der Rohe's Farnsworth House, and Walter Gropius's Bauhaus School. These case studies highlight the transformative impact of architectural design principles on building aesthetics and functionality. The Notre Dame Cathedral introduced a revolutionary structural system that liberated the facade from its traditional load-bearing role, allowing for expansive stained-glass windows and intricate stone carvings that set the stage for future architectural innovations. Mies van der Rohe's Farnsworth House exemplifies the minimalist approach, emphasizing transparency and the seamless integration of interior and exterior spaces. The Bauhaus School, under Gropius's leadership, merged art, technology, and craftsmanship, creating a new architectural language characterized by simplicity and functional beauty. Through a detailed analysis of these projects, the essay provides insights into the enduring influence of these architectural milestones on contemporary design practices.
Keywords
Modern Architecture, Facade Design, Architectural Envelopes
1.Introduction
The designing of architectural facades and envelopes has been a critical aspect of contemporary architectural practice, indicating changes in technologies, aesthetic tastes, and functional demands from buildings. This essay revisits the development and influence of design practices associated with building facades and envelopes, with a critical appraisal of three monumental case studies: the Notre Dame Cathedral in Paris, Mies van der Rohe's Farnsworth House, and Walter Gropius's Bauhaus School. One commonality all these projects share is a distinct approach toward architectural design, expressing the relation of structural innovation, use of materials, and visual expression.
The Notre Dame Cathedral, a masterpiece of Gothic architecture, introduced revolutionary structural systems that liberated the facade from its traditional load-bearing role, paving the way for the inclusion of expansive stained-glass windows and intricate stone carvings. These innovations marked a significant shift in architectural design, highlighting the evolving relationship between structure and aesthetics.
Built in 1951, Mies van der Rohe's Farnsworth House encapsulates these ideas, forging a minimalist aesthetic that espouses the integration of interior and exterior spaces. The extensive use of glass and steel in this design not only emphasizes technological advancements but also portrays a seamless integration with nature, redefining the relationship between architecture and the environment.
The Bauhaus School, established in 1919 by Walter Gropius, epitomized the fusion of art, technology, and craftsmanship. The functional simplicity, modular design, and prefabrication approach initiated new standards in architectural practice. The austere forms and transparent façades that characterized Bauhaus buildings have had a lasting influence on modernist architecture, showcasing how visual clarity and structural integrity can coexist.
This essay comparatively analyzes these three cases studies and explores the evolving themes of technological innovation and visual expression within modern architecture. By weaving together the narratives of each case, one can understand how historical contexts and design philosophies set landmarks in the transformational powers of architectural design, providing lasting impacts on the urban built environment.
2.Case Study
2.1.The Notre Dame Cathedral
2.1.1.Evolution
The evolution of the Notre Dame Cathedral has greatly affected the understanding and development of the façade within architectural history. It represents the shifting architectural trends and technological change between the Medieval movement and today.
The original construction of Notre Dame, begun in 1163, was a milestone in architectural design. In place were the flying buttresses, ribbed vaults, and pointed arches that defined the Gothic and that permitted, for the first time, a sense of verticality and lightness in a stone building. Among other wonders, such innovations made room for tall, large stained-glass windows—a Gothic cathedral signature—deluging the interior with light and filling it with a divine presence [1,2].
The Notre Dame facade, its three principal portals sculptured with countless images, and its celebrated rose windows constituted the model of Gothic architecture. This façade was set to communicate biblical stories and religious concepts to illiterate people, using storytelling to educate and exalt [2].
Symmetry, Proportion, and Classical Aspects primed architectural design from the time of the Renaissance. Despite the Gothic style being so prominent, particularly in Notre Dame, some slight influences from the Renaissance were added to the restoration and improvement works at the cathedral. The restoration works added more decorations in terms of sculpture, which were more artistic with features of cultural vitality, yet more intricate than the basics of the Gothic bases combined with the Renaissance aspects [3].
2.1.2.Technological Innovation
That 19th-century restoration by Eugène Viollet-le-Duc can be said to be one of the landmarks in the development of the frontage. He brought innovation into the restoration of the façade, mixing historical accuracy with modernity. Viollet-le-Duc repaired not only the ones that had been caused during the time of the French Revolution but also added new features to the cathedral that included what is at present its iconic spire. His work promised respect in the maintenance of historical integrity, with a provision for modern advancement [4]. Key in Viollet-le-duc's 19th-century restorations were iron reinforcements. In such a manner, he treated the longevity and stability of the cathedral by surrendering it at various points to traditional craftsmanship mingled with modern engineering solutions.
The ongoing evolvement of Notre Dame's façade over a restoration in the 21st century, particularly in the wake of the 2019 fire, reflects a striking dynamic now being facilitated by cutting-edge technology. Digital modeling and 3D laser scanning were vital for creating accurate replicas of the destroyed parts, enabling the restoration to be historical yet, in a way, contemporary with the techniques used. These technologies provide a better understanding of the construction techniques adopted and materials while constructing the cathedral, thereby making the restoration process much more informed and effective [5].
Notre Dame's construction and restoration have been done following technological advances and innovations applied in the practice of architecture.
As a masterpiece of revolutionary medieval engineering, Notre Dame exhibits a load-bearing design that is truly exemplary. The use of flying buttresses was a breakthrough in and of itself: it gave integral support to the extremely tall walls of the cathedral and giant windows. In that sense, it allowed greater airflow into the interior space and provided more transparency of light, thus improving physical construction, and proving functionally beneficial [6].
The 21st-century restoration efforts included the use of state-of-the-art technologies. For instance, digital models and 3D laser scanning have enabled the capturing of all the features of Notre Dame's architecture. Such tools provide an opportunity for restorers to make highly accurate copies of damaged elements, enough to understand the construction of a cathedral on an unprecedented level of detail. Modern materials will come to improve its resistance and thus guarantee its existence over the long term: fire-resistant timbers and advanced stone preservation among others [7].
2.1.3.Visual Expression
The facade of Notre Dame is a compendium of visual narrative, religious iconography, and artistic work.
The facade of Notre Dame is a theological canvas designed to convey religious messages and educate the faithful. The three main portals are decorated with sculptures aiming to show uneducated medieval audience scenes from the Bible and to reflect biblical stories and themes. For instance, the Portal of the Last Judgment displays Christ as the judge of the world accompanied by angels, saints, and risen-up souls as evidence of the Christian eschatological vision [3].
These architectural feats, the rose windows, are filled with symbolisms illustrating the Virgin Mary and God's divine light. The biblical stories and the saints within the elaborate designs of the stained glass are a story that begets the liturgical purpose of the cathedral [2].
The facade of Notre Dame is a Gothic masterpiece. The 28 biblical kings are portrayed in the Gallery of Kings. They are also all uniquely and individually shaped into tries and regally acting statues. These sculptures detected the level of art and masonry work of the medieval stonemasons. They particularly can impart the sculptures in the lifelike stone [8]. Much adds to the aesthetic perception and artistic fancy of the buildings, the gargoyles, and grotesques serving as functional drains. These return to the medieval belief: the warding off of evil spirits and the freedom of creative expression of the artisans [5].
The facade of Notre Dame narrates the story of its evolution and the unfolding of historical stories over its life span. With roots in the medieval age and damages and desecrations during the French Revolution, followed by portions of its restoration made by Viollet-le-Duc, the façade carries the scars of history. Each restoration project or renovation only adds to the story, turning it into a live document of architectural history and culture [9]. The facade’s current restoration efforts post-2019 fire blend modern technology with traditional craftsmanship to preserve and enhance its visual and structural integrity [4].
The Notre Dame Cathedral’s facade is a testament to the evolution of architectural styles, technological advancements, and artistic expression. From its medieval origins to its ongoing restoration, Notre Dame embodies the dynamic interplay of history, technology, and art. Its facade is not merely a structural element but a visual and symbolic narrative that continues to inspire and captivate people worldwide. As restoration efforts proceed, the facade of Notre Dame will undoubtedly continue to serve as a symbol of resilience, faith, and human creativity.
2.2.The Farnsworth House by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
2.2.1.Evolution
The Farnsworth House by Ludwig Mies van der Rohe was one of the great milestones in modern architecture regarding the conception and realization of facades and envelopes. Done in 1951, the house set ideals of simplicity, transparency, and the integration of the interior and exterior spaces, ideals that were borrowed from architectural designs.
Modernist theories are embodied in the Farnsworth House completed early into the 20th century. Modernism meant an emphasis on function, and simplicity, using materials in their newness such as steel and glass. To put it briefly, Farnsworth House exponentiates and embodies the saying of Mies van der Rohe: "Less is more". The minimal approach towards structure through open space and a lack of any ornament is quite a shift from traditional styles.
The design of minimalism is not only by aesthetic considerations but also by functionality, allowing the house to merge with nature. This design approach points to the integration of the building with its environment. It reflects the ideology of modernist architecture and has been influential in the evolution of contemporary architectural practices on a large scale [2].
Something great about the Farnsworth House is the manner it integrates with the landscape. This house stands on stilts to avoid flooding caused by the Fox River and lifts the structure above the environment to make a person feel like they are floating. The generous use of glass for the walls, in the meantime, scatters the seeming partitioning of the interior and the exterior. The extensive transparency allows the occupants to feel part and parcel of the surrounding nature. This general idea is one of the main streams in modern architecture. The new architecture has further highlighted the importance of the integration of natural elements within the architectural design towards creating sustainable and energy-efficient buildings [10].
The work of the Farnsworth House has seen a far-reaching influence over the later nature of architectural designs, particularly those to do with glass and open-plan floors. This can be reinvented in most contemporary structures, with an emphasis on transparency and form fluidity from within to the outside of a building. The house has also been the harbinger of modernity for the use of prefabricated materials and methods for building, and it became more and more common as time went on in architecture [9].
2.2.2.Technological Innovation
The Farnsworth House realizes some of the revolutionary, innovative technological developments of its period of construction, all of which continue to be an influence over architectural practice. The way Mies van der Rohe made the Farnsworth House was very forward-looking and precedent-setting in terms of prefabrication and precision assembly. In that way, steel components are made off-site before moving to the site, factors that control quality during its construction and precision. This method of prefabricating has been influential in modern building methods and practices, which make architectures more efficient in construction and greener regarding waste. The structural system of the Farnsworth House keeps up with the masterpiece of engineering simplicity. The house has an eight-column frame to hold the flat roof beside the floor slabs so that the interior is free from any obstructions. This structural clarity augments not only the aesthetics but also reveals the potential of steel as the base building material. This structural clarity enhances not only the aesthetics of the house but also makes visible the potential of steel as a fundamental building material.
The simplicity of the constructional system permits more openness and flexibility in the interior layout, a feature that has come to be modern in design. The fact that supports of steel columns hold the building enabled wide openings of the glass walls to expose the house's relationship with the natural environment [8].
Farnsworth House has been a landmark for the heavy usage of glass in its structure—an avant-garde, far-reaching architectural decision that renders the building a symbol of modern architecture. The windows' glass at the Farnsworth House is not just for representation of the county view but for a good purpose and a symbol. Technological advancements in manufacturing processes have made glass panels larger, stronger, and more thermally efficient, presently allowing glass to be a primary construction material [7].
2.2.3.Visual Expression
The Farnsworth House is a simple aesthetic statement of beauty and practical elegance through minimalism; it reflects Mies van der Rohe's championing of the purity of form and material.
With the minimalist aesthetic, Farnsworth House discards any other accessories in the rest of the assemblies to accentuate form and function purity. On top of that, the paper could have no decorations, being a wide expanse with clean lines, hence explaining the calm and order of the minimalist style. The simple approach underscores the natural elements while working to add to the aesthetic appeal of the house [3].
A major design feature that the Farnsworth house embodies is transparency. It lets natural light gently pour into all rooms through glass walls, creating a brilliant glow and giving an effect of expanded space. That makes the house more connected to the environment, further adding to the apparent size. The dynamism of the outlook from the inside is granted by the ever-changing play of light and shade by the new season and with each new day [5].
The art expression of the Farnsworth House is inherently related to the natural environment: the house is elevated to intercept views of the Fox River and woodlands that wrap the site, engendering a pervading sense of being a part of the natural world. Its elevation from the ground for more than six feet keeps the house safe from heavy water; simultaneously, it adds to the lightness and relatedness with the natural environment. The use of glass is underlined to link, which turns the house into a transparent pavilion in a natural setting [4].
Ludwig Mies van der Rohe inscribed the Farnsworth House as a watershed in the history of modern architecture—simplicity, transparency, and merges with nature. Innovative use of material and construction techniques has directly, over time, impacted architectural practices within modern buildings. The visual expression of the house into which the minimalist design fits in and melds with the natural environment has only kept on becoming inspiring and fascinating to architects and enthusiasts from across the globe.
2.3.The Bauhaus School by Walter Gropius
2.3.1.Evolution
Founded in 1919 by Walter Gropius, the Bauhaus School symbolized a new vision for architecture and design, one that would greatly impact the course of modern-day architectural facades and enclosures.
Bauhaus School came into existence after World War I when the world observed a period of incredible social and economic changes. This motivated Gropius to develop a whole new architectural speech that was utilitarian, practical, and yet to be in everyone's reach. Bauhaus has been trying the use of the craft and the newest technology at that time to narrow the gap of what is between art and industry.
The architectural philosophy of Walter Gropius at the Bauhaus was one largely practical and simple. The design had to be practical and beautiful. Their building designs suggested great clean lines, a minimum of ornamentation, and a turn toward geometric shapes. Bauhaus facades derive from these doctrines and, for that reason, put an emphasis on horizontality and transparency, with modern industrial materials such as glass, steel, and concrete.
The concept of design that underpins Bauhaus school has been influential for modern architecture Based on this junction: the combination of form and function, together with the use of new materials and technologies, has all along influenced many architects and designers. Throughout the modern world, many buildings and structures conceived under the concept of modernist have borrowed the Bauhaus approach to designing a facade, hence suggesting simplicities, transparencies, and expression of structural character. This proved the influence of Bauhaus on later architects, namely Ludwig Mies van der Rohe and Le Corbusier, who applied and developed Bauhaus features in their work [4,9].
The School initiated technological innovation in Bauhaus architecture; it experimented with new materials and building processes that turned into a revolution in the domain of providing more modern alternatives for facade and enclosure systems.
One of the most striking technical achievements of Bauhaus was extending the exterior walls with huge amounts of glass and steel. These materials bring transparency and open, flexible design of interior spaces. Typical in Bauhaus architecture are glass curtain walls that give natural light and a feeling of openness while, at the same time, making it strong by the steel frames from which they are fabricated. Such a combination of materials was revolutionary for the time and laid the base ground for the formation of modernist architecture [8].
The Bauhaus led the development of prefabricated materials and modular design. Gropius and his other staff researched the use of prefabricated members for boosts also as an efficiency and cost-saving advantage in the building. This can boost the precision and speed of house-building processes. The modular design from the Bauhaus has had much impact on modern architectural practices in making some sustainable and flexible structures [1,7].
The Bauhaus ideal of mixing technology and craft comes out in the way facades are designed. In the school, the value that is raised is that of embracing technology but still producing high-quality and esthetically pleasing buildings, commensurate with the craftsmanship. This relationship is fully mirrored by fine construction techniques and the novel techniques in building that Bauhaus architecture incorporated. The seamless combination of traditional processes with new technologies paves the way for new construction technologies to come in the future [3].
2.3.2.Visual Expression
The Bauhaus architecture is visually expressed by simplicity, clarity, and practical beauty. Concepts like this are reflected in the look of the Bauhaus exterior, making for a unique and distinguishable building.
Bauhaus is marked by minimalism, in the elimination of superfluous decorations, and the emphasis on purity of form. The Bauhaus style of building is manifested in its physical appearance by the use of clean lines, geometric shapes, and limited color schemes. The latter contributes a sense of order and harmony through simplicity and utility, which a Bauhaus school of thought upholds in its tenet of the unity between art and technology [2].
The transparency of the Bauhaus edifices was realized by using a lot of glass on the building facades. The interiors are bathed with natural light, which is pervasive throughout the interior disposition of the building. This also blurs the line between inside and outside, making a connection between building and site. The dynamic effect on the facade surfaces is created by light and shadow interplay on the glass surface itself [5].
In Bauhaus buildings, the structure usually gets expressed in the facades. The steel frame left apparent, together with its visible joints, can tell more about the structure of the building than anything else and about the harmony of form and function in the building. This technique develops honesty and transparency in style, making the structure of the building an integral part of its beauty. Truthfulness in Bauhaus facade structure gives expression to openness and honesty of materials and structures intrinsic at the school in dedication to openness and honesty within the institution [6].
The Bauhaus Institute, guided by Walter Gropius, reedited the aesthetics of the facades and enclosures of buildings in a new sense of the contemporary world. Out of the blisteringly practical, plain speaking, and art-and-technology mediating Bauhaus School, a new architectural lexicon was born and propagated. Creative uses of materials, prefabrication, and a dedication to craftsmanship had to fix new standards for architectural design. This is apparent in the way modern design, since that time, has been motivated and inspired by the visual expression of a Bauhaus facade, in that it reverberates with notions of minimalism, transparency, and structural purity. The Bauhaus thus signifies—apart from demonstrating—the very long-lasting impact on visionary design principles and technological innovations across the history of architectural facades.
3.Discussion
The Notre Dame Cathedral, the Farnsworth House, and the Bauhaus School all represent watershed points in the progress of architectural design. The Notre Dame Cathedral, a paragon of Gothic architecture, introduced revolutionary structural techniques such as flying buttresses and ribbed vaults, which enabled the creation of higher ceilings and larger windows. These innovations laid the groundwork for the expansive and light-filled interiors that are characteristic of Gothic cathedrals.
Farnsworth House was built with these ideas in mind, pushing the limits of openness and interaction with nature. Mies van der Rohe's minimalist style and emphasis on simplicity and openness heralded a dramatic shift in the way facades and enclosures were treated, inspiring many architects to adopt similar design concepts.
The Bauhaus, led by Walter Gropius, promoted these ideas by combining practicality and aesthetic simplicity. The school's integrated approach to design and emphasis on the integration of art, technology, and craft have led to the development of a new architectural language that remains relevant in modern architecture.
All three case studies have similar threads of technological innovation. The Notre Dame Cathedral’s use of flying buttresses and ribbed vaults provided unprecedented structural stability, enabling the development of expansive, light-filled interiors. These technological innovations allowed for the inclusion of intricate stained-glass windows, enhancing both the structural integrity and the visual impact of the cathedral.
The Farnsworth House combines glass and steel in innovative ways that define modernist architecture. Mies van der Rohe designed ways in which these materials could be used to attain a total dissolved relationship between the interior and exterior, emphasizing particularly the issues of transparency and quality of light.
The Bauhaus School was the leader in the use of prefabricated and modular design. Gropius' concentration on efficiency and precision of building procedures led the way for the current system of prefabricated buildings. Using modern materials and methods, in conjunction with traditional craftsmanship, the Bauhaus was able to establish, both for its revered practitioners and for those it served, a role model of future architectural practice that was pragmatic and aesthetic.
Underlying design concepts and technological breakthroughs are usually represented visually in each of the case studies. The structure of the Notre Dame Cathedral achieves a monumental presence through its intricate stone carvings and expansive stained-glass windows, which have gone on to influence Gothic architecture.
The Farnsworth House uses a great deal of glass, allowing it to appear an extraordinary expression in visual transparency and daylighting. The designs by Mies van der Rohe quite blur boundary lines between inside and outside to give a harmonious interaction with the surrounding environment. The minimalist look and requirement for open space in this home have kept architects experimenting with the same design concepts.
In this regard, the Bauhaus architectural style is simple, clarified, and practically adorned. External facades of Bauhaus edifices are open, clearly demonstrating their geometrical shapes with clear lines and simplicity of straight presentation of structural details. Glass curtain walls with open steel framework employment offer a clear, open look which has become a symbol for modern architecture.
4.Conclusion
This paper will pursue through its three examples, which are the Notre Dame Cathedral, the Farnsworth House by Mies van der Rohe, and the Bauhaus School by Walter Gropius, development, technological change, and visual expression in the context of the modern architectural facades and enclosures. Each of these three is important because each uniquely represents a watershed event in the progression of architectural design, showcasing unique techniques and beliefs that have influenced modern architectural practice.
In essence, the Notre Dame Cathedral, the Farnsworth House, and the Bauhaus all remain considerable legacies in contemporary architectural history where aspects of the creative use of the materials and the processes of construction bear a unique visual expression in the design of the facade and envelope. In these given case studies, one learns the lesson of technological innovation and the union of practicality with aesthetics to go a long way toward producing an enduring architectural design. The study of these landmarks enables to comprehend better the concepts and methods that continue to define contemporary architecture.
References
[1]. Camporeale, P. E., Mercader Moyano, M. del P., & Czajkowski, J. D. (2017). Multi-objective optimisation model: A housing block retrofit in Seville. Energy and Buildings, 153, 476-484.
[2]. Kaji-O’Grady, S. (2011). Subnature: Architecture’s other environments. Journal of Architecture, 16(3), 447-449.
[3]. Depecker, P., Menezo, C., Virgone, J., & Lepers, S. (2001). Design of buildings shapes and energetic consumption. Building and Environment, 36(5), 627-635.
[4]. Korman, R. (2023). The architecture of the facade (1st ed.). Routledge.
[5]. Liang, K., Li, L., & Yang, Y. (2017). Inorganic porous films for renewable energy storage. ACS Energy Letters, 2(2), 373-390.
[6]. Mahmoud, A. H. A., & Elghazi, Y. (2016). Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns. Solar Energy, 126, 111-127.
[7]. Caldas, L. (2008). Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: An evolution-based generative design system. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(1), 59-70.
[8]. Cruz, P. J. S. (Ed.). (2019). Structures and architecture - Bridging the gap and crossing borders: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Structures and Architecture (ICSA 2019), 24-26.
[9]. Buntrock, D. (2006). Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing and Performative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality - Edited by Branko Kolarevic, Branko Kolarevic and Ali Malkawi. Journal of Architectural Education, 60(1), 67-68.
[10]. Calcerano, F., & Martinelli, L. (2016). Numerical optimisation through dynamic simulation of the position of trees around a stand-alone building to reduce cooling energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 112, 234-243.
Cite this article
Wu,Y. (2024). Facade and Envelope Design in Architecture--The Evolution, Technological Innovation, and Visual Expression. Communications in Humanities Research,45,1-8.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Art, Design and Social Sciences
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Camporeale, P. E., Mercader Moyano, M. del P., & Czajkowski, J. D. (2017). Multi-objective optimisation model: A housing block retrofit in Seville. Energy and Buildings, 153, 476-484.
[2]. Kaji-O’Grady, S. (2011). Subnature: Architecture’s other environments. Journal of Architecture, 16(3), 447-449.
[3]. Depecker, P., Menezo, C., Virgone, J., & Lepers, S. (2001). Design of buildings shapes and energetic consumption. Building and Environment, 36(5), 627-635.
[4]. Korman, R. (2023). The architecture of the facade (1st ed.). Routledge.
[5]. Liang, K., Li, L., & Yang, Y. (2017). Inorganic porous films for renewable energy storage. ACS Energy Letters, 2(2), 373-390.
[6]. Mahmoud, A. H. A., & Elghazi, Y. (2016). Parametric-based designs for kinetic facades to optimize daylight performance: Comparing rotation and translation kinetic motion for hexagonal facade patterns. Solar Energy, 126, 111-127.
[7]. Caldas, L. (2008). Generation of energy-efficient architecture solutions applying GENE_ARCH: An evolution-based generative design system. Advanced Engineering Informatics, 22(1), 59-70.
[8]. Cruz, P. J. S. (Ed.). (2019). Structures and architecture - Bridging the gap and crossing borders: Proceedings of the Fourth International Conference on Structures and Architecture (ICSA 2019), 24-26.
[9]. Buntrock, D. (2006). Architecture in the Digital Age: Design and Manufacturing and Performative Architecture: Beyond Instrumentality - Edited by Branko Kolarevic, Branko Kolarevic and Ali Malkawi. Journal of Architectural Education, 60(1), 67-68.
[10]. Calcerano, F., & Martinelli, L. (2016). Numerical optimisation through dynamic simulation of the position of trees around a stand-alone building to reduce cooling energy consumption. Energy and Buildings, 112, 234-243.