Research Article
Open access
Published on 15 November 2024
Download pdf
Zhang,R. (2024). Analysis of the Reasons for “Vicarious Liability” in Tort—From the Perspective of Economics. Communications in Humanities Research,49,44-47.
Export citation

Analysis of the Reasons for “Vicarious Liability” in Tort—From the Perspective of Economics

Ruining Zhang *,1,
  • 1 Southwest University of Political Science and Law

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/49/20240175

Abstract

There is no word for "Vicarious Liability" in Chinese law, but as an important concept in the common law system and a common situation in civil law, this article explains the reason and rationality of the establishment of Vicarious Liability from the perspective of economics. This paper explains the benefits of applying the principle of strict liability by applying the Hand formula and the minimum cost principle. To be sure, Vicarious Liability greatly reduces the cost of private transactions, which is conducive to the circulation of the market and the development of the society. Research methods involved in the paper: literature analysis, and case analysis. The study finds that although Vicarious Liability is criticized by some branch theory in the law system, it still has the rationality and necessity of its existence. The importance of vicarious liability can be found especially in the field of employment relationships and in the minor infringement.

Keywords

Vicarious Liability, Minimum Cost, Supervision of Minor Children, Employment Relations.

[1]. Wang Cheng, Reflection and Reconstruction of tort substitution Liability in Civil Law, China, 2023, No.05, p. 22

[2]. [Switzerland] Piere Widmer: Liability for Damage to Others: Swiss Law, [He] Jaap Spier: Unification of Tort Law: Liability for Damage to Others, translated by Mei Xiaying, Gao Shengping, Law Press, 2009, p. 344.

[3]. Lian Zekai, The Inquiry of British Strict Responsibility -- centered on the Lai Principles British Research 2022,02, p. 103

[4]. Yang Jingorange Legal and economic analysis of winning telecom fraud--From the perspective of victim crime prevention cost legal Expo 2017,26, page 6

[5]. Liu Shunjie, "Application of Hand Formula", 2022, page 8

[6]. Zhai Yue, Research on the Principles of Environmental Tort Accountability from the Perspective of Legal Economics, Issue 02,2017, p. 15

[7]. Xiao Rong, Hao Bo, A Brief Analysis of legal and Economic Issues in Demolition--From the Efficiency perspective of Caldo and Hicks, 12,2013, pp. 27-28

[8]. Richard·A·Posner, Economic Analysis of the Law, Little Brown Publishing Company, 1992, p. 99

[9]. Zhang Min'an, Comparative Research on vicarious Liability, Journal of Gansu University of Political Science and Law, No.05,2009, p. 52

Cite this article

Zhang,R. (2024). Analysis of the Reasons for “Vicarious Liability” in Tort—From the Perspective of Economics. Communications in Humanities Research,49,44-47.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Art, Design and Social Sciences

Conference website: https://2024.icadss.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-685-3(Print) / 978-1-83558-686-0(Online)
Conference date: 18 October 2024
Editor:Enrique Mallen
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.49
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).