Research Article
Open access
Published on 15 November 2024
Download pdf
Sun,W. (2024). The Dual Construction of Symbolic Imagery and Double-voiced Discourse: The Hierarchical Order in A Rose for Emily. Communications in Humanities Research,50,50-55.
Export citation

The Dual Construction of Symbolic Imagery and Double-voiced Discourse: The Hierarchical Order in A Rose for Emily

Wenxin Sun *,1,
  • 1 Shandong University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/50/20242548

Abstract

Social structure and hierarchical order, as the key issues throughout human history, continue to stimulate the academic community to deeply explore the relationship between social form and individual destiny. With its unique artistic perspective, William Faulkner's masterpiece, A Rose for Emily, vividly shows the social landscape of a specific historical period, which has aroused a wide range of academic discussions. This paper focuses on the subtle symbolism in the novel, and at the same time takes the narrative strategy of two-voice discourse as a clue to deeply analyze how the two work together to construct a complex and profound social hierarchy order framework in A Rose for Emily. This analysis not only highlights the diversity and innovation of novel techniques but also reveals the intricate correspondence between them and the background of social reality at that time, providing a new perspective and insight for understanding how literature reflects society and criticizes reality.

Keywords

William Faulkner, A Rose for Emily, symbol, double-voiced discourse, hierarchical order.

[1]. Melcazarek, Nick. Narrative Motivation in Faulkner’s A Rose for Emily[J]. The Explicator,2009(67):237-239.

[2]. Faulkner, William. A Rose for Emily. Perfection Learning, 1990.

[3]. Shklovsky, Viktor. Art, as Device. Porter Institute for Poetics and Semiotics, 2016.

[4]. Zhang, Dan. “Where to Find Roses - Analyzing the Symbolism of Roses Based on Character Conflicts in A Rose for Emily.” Journal of Hubei Open Vocational College, no. 15, 2022, pp. 191-95.

[5]. Bakhtin, Mikhail. Problems of Dostoevsky’s poetics. University of Minnesota Press, 1984.

[6]. Zhao, Yiheng. General Narrative. Sichuan University Press, 2013.

Cite this article

Sun,W. (2024). The Dual Construction of Symbolic Imagery and Double-voiced Discourse: The Hierarchical Order in A Rose for Emily. Communications in Humanities Research,50,50-55.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies

Conference website: https://2024.icihcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-713-3(Print) / 978-1-83558-714-0(Online)
Conference date: 29 September 2024
Editor:Heidi Gregory-Mina
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.50
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).