The Relationship Between the Levels of Motivation and Learning Strategies of Aspiring Teachers at the Higher Education Level
- 1 Durham University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The motivation levels of potential teachers in higher education and the learning strategies they use are contrasted in this study. A student's learning style and, therefore, their academic performance, are heavily influenced by their intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Strategies for learning might range from memorisation to analysis and synthesis. This impacts students' academic achievement. Therefore, the primary objective of this research is to examine the relationship between intrinsic motivation and the effectiveness of various learning strategies among future educators. Understanding these relationships can enable teachers to better support student engagement and academic success. By highlighting the role of educational psychology in shaping effective teaching methods, this study aims to enhance teacher training programs to better address students' diverse learning needs and promote improved study habits through intrinsic motivation.
Keywords
motivation, learning strategies, intrinsic motivation.
[1]. Busato, V. V., Prins, F. J., Elshout, J. J., & Hamaker, C. (2000). Intellectual ability, learning style, personality, achievement motivation and academic success of psychology students in higher education. Personality and Individual differences, 29(6), 1057-1068
[2]. Bandhu, D., Mohan, M. M., Nittala, N. A. P., Jadhav, P., Bhadauria, A., & Saxena, K. K. (2024). Theories of motivation: A comprehensive analysis of human behavior drivers. Acta Psychologica, 244, 104177.
[3]. Allen, D. (1999). Desire to finish college: An empirical link between motivation and persistence. Research in higher education, 40(4), 461-485.
[4]. Stover, J. B., Freiberg Hoffmann, A., de la Iglesia, G., & Fernandez Liporace, M. M. (2014). Predicting academic achievement: The role of motivation and learning strategies.
[5]. Amerstorfer, C. M., & Freiin von Münster-Kistner, C. (2021). Student Perceptions of Academic Engagement and Student-Teacher Relationships in Problem-Based Learning. Frontiers in Psychology, 12(12). https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2021.713057
[6]. Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students' learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of educational psychology, 80(3), 260.
[7]. Kiefer, S. M., Ellerbrock, C., & Alley, K. (2014). The role of responsive teacher practices in supporting academic motivation at the middle level. RMLE Online, 38(1), 1-16.
[8]. Krapp, A. (1999). Interest, motivation and learning: An educational-psychological perspective. European journal of psychology of education, 14, 23-40.
[9]. Sweller, J. (1988). Cognitive load during problem solving: Effects on learning. Cognitive science, 12(2), 257-285.
[10]. Miller, A. (1987). Cognitive styles: An integrated model. Educational psychology, 7(4), 251-268.
[11]. Pashler, H., McDaniel, M., Rohrer, D., & Bjork, R. (2008). Learning styles: Concepts and evidence. Psychological science in the public interest, 9(3), 105-119.
[12]. Winne, P. H. (1996). A metacognitive view of individual differences in self-regulated learning. Learning and individual differences, 8(4), 327-353.
[13]. Lo, J. J., Chan, Y. C., & Yeh, S. W. (2012). Designing an adaptive web-based learning system based on students’ cognitive styles identified online. Computers & Education, 58(1), 209-222.
[14]. Pintrich, P. R., & Zusho, A. (2002). The development of academic self-regulation: The role of cognitive and motivational factors. In Development of achievement motivation (pp. 249-284). Academic Press.
[15]. Algharaibeh, S. A. S. (2020). Should I ask for help? The role of motivation and help-seeking in students’ academic achievement: A path analysis model. Kıbrıslı Eğitim Bilimleri Dergisi, 15(5), 1128-1145.
[16]. Artino Jr, A. R. (2005). Review of the Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. Online Submission.
[17]. Azevedo, R., F. Behnagh, R., Duffy, M., M. Harley, J., & Trevors, G. (2012). Metacognition and Self-Regulated Learning in Student-Centered Learning Environments. In S. Land & D. Jonassen (Eds.), Theoretical Foundations of Learning Environments (pp. 171–197).
[18]. Lin, L. J. (1992). Self-improving reactive agents based on reinforcement learning, planning and teaching. Machine learning, 8, 293-321.
[19]. Brophy, J. (2004). Motivating students to learn. Routledge.
[20]. Coates, H. (2005). The value of student engagement for higher education quality assurance. Quality in higher education, 11(1), 25-36.
[21]. Garcia, T., & Pintrich, P. R. (1996). Assessing students’ motivation and learning strategies in the classroom context: The Motivated Strategies for Learning Questionnaire. In Alternatives in assessment of achievements, learning processes and prior knowledge (pp. 319-339). Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands.
[22]. Mauludin, L., Sefrina, L., Ardianti, T., Prasetyo, G., Prassetyo, S., & Putri, C. (2023). An Investigation of the Students’ Perceptions of Motivating Teaching Strategies in English for Specific Purposes Classes. Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice, 20(6).
[23]. Schmeck, R. R. (Ed.). (2013). Learning strategies and learning styles. Springer Science & Business Media.
[24]. Thomas, J. W., & Rohwer Jr, W. D. (1986). Academic studying: The role of learning strategies. Educational psychologist, 21(1-2), 19-41.
[25]. Claxton, C. S., & Murrell, P. H. (1987). Learning Styles: Implications for Improving Educational Practices. ASHE-ERIC Higher Education Report No. 4, 1987. Association for the Study of Higher Education, 1 Dupont Circle, Suite 630, Washington, DC 20036.
[26]. Bordios, R., Demafiles, T., Baylosis, T. C., Omotong, K., & Gumobar, N. (2023). Adaptability of Blended Learning among the Education Students of Notre Dame of Midsayap College. Psychology and Education: A Multidisciplinary Journal, 15(10), 1120-1132.
[27]. Keller, J., & Suzuki, K. (2004). Learner motivation and e-learning design: A multinationally validated process. Journal of educational Media, 29(3), 229-239.
[28]. Harandi, S. R. (2015). Effects of e-learning on Students’ Motivation. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 181, 423-430.
[29]. Hsu, K. C. (2016). Social gamification in multimedia instruction: assessing the effects of animation, reward strategies, and social interactions on learners motivation and academic performance in online settings.
[30]. Fazey, I., Fazey, J. A., & Fazey, D. M. (2005). Learning more effectively from experience. Ecology and Society, 10(2).
[31]. Biggs, J. (1999). What the student does: Teaching for enhanced learning. Higher education research & development, 18(1), 57-75.
[32]. Williams, K. C., & Williams, C. C. (2011). Five key ingredients for improving student motivation. Research in higher education journal, 12, 1.
[33]. Barkley, E. F., & Major, C. H. (2020). Student engagement techniques: A handbook for college faculty. John Wiley & Sons.
[34]. Dart, B. C., & Clarke, J. A. (1991). Helping students become better learners: a case study in teacher education. Higher Education, 22(3), 317-335.
[35]. Bahri, A., & Corebima, A. D. (2015). The Contribution of Learning Motivation and Metacognitive Skill on Cognitive Learning Outcome of Students within Different Learning Strategies. Journal of Baltic Science Education, 14(4), 487-500.
[36]. Baird, L. L. (1976). Using Self-Reports to Predict Student Performance. Research Monograph No. 7.
[37]. Howard, J. L., Bureau, J. S., Guay, F., Chong, J. X., & Ryan, R. M. (2021). Student motivation and associated outcomes: A meta-analysis from self-determination theory. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 16(6), 1300-1323.
[38]. Soydan, D. (2018). Adult learners' experience with immediate intervention in a self-regulated learning environment. Capella University.
[39]. Misra, P. K., & Misra, P. K. (2021). Strategies for Learning. Learning and Teaching for Teachers, 59-80.;
[40]. Mannion, J. (2018). Metacognition, self-regulation, oracy: A mixed methods case study of a complex, whole-school Learning to Learn intervention.
[41]. Duckworth, E. (2006). The having of wonderful ideas and other essays on teaching and learning. Teachers College Press.
[42]. Zimmerman, B. J., & Schunk, D. H. (2012). Motivation: An essential dimension of self-regulated learning. In Motivation and self-regulated learning (pp. 1-30). Routledge.
[43]. Kusurkar, R. A., Croiset, G., Mann, K. V., Custers, E., & Ten Cate, O. (2012). Have motivation theories guided the development and reform of medical education curricula? A review of the literature. Academic Medicine, 87(6), 735-743.
[44]. Pintrich, P. R. (2003). A motivational science perspective on the role of student motivation in learning and teaching contexts. Journal of educational Psychology, 95(4), 667.
Cite this article
Li,H. (2024). The Relationship Between the Levels of Motivation and Learning Strategies of Aspiring Teachers at the Higher Education Level. Communications in Humanities Research,50,1-8.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).