Download pdf
The Coherence Relations of "Mollie" in Animal Farm under Segmented Discourse Representation Theory(SDRT)
- 1 Macau University of Science and Technology
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This paper delves into the coherence relations of Mollie, a character from George Orwell's "Animal Farm," utilizing the Segmented Discourse Representation Theory (SDRT) to analyze her role within the narrative. The study reviews the current research on "Animal Farm," highlighting the scarcity of in-depth analysis of Mollie's character, which is often overlooked in favor of more prominent characters. The paper introduces SDRT, a linguistic theory that dissects discourse into smaller segments to examine logical connections and coherence, providing a fresh perspective to explore Mollie's actions and their implications in the novel. The application of the SDRT framework to Mollie's character reveals how her individual desires and actions contrast with the collective ethos of the farm, symbolizing the broader themes of individualism versus collectivism. It also underscores her reactions to the power structures, which are indicative of the farm's societal dynamics. The analysis contributes to a deeper understanding of Mollie's role and her interactions with other characters, offering insights into the underlying social and political commentary of "Animal Farm." The paper concludes that SDRT not only enriches our comprehension of Mollie's character but also enhances the interpretation of the novel's overall message, shedding light on the complexities of power, freedom, and loyalty within the context of a totalitarian regime.
Keywords
SDRT, coherence relations, ‘Mollie’ in Animal Farm
[1]. M J N. The Conflict Between Center and Edge in George Orwell's Animal Farm[J].Journal of Educational Research and Policies, 2023, 5(6).
[2]. MBON A, MABIALA I R G. A Connotative Analysis of Characters in George Orwell’s Animal Farm[J].International Journal of Literature Studies, 2022, 2(2):118-125.
[3]. P. A M, Rahman F, Anriadi. Instruments of Symbolic Violence in George Orwell’s Animal Farm[J].Journal of Language Teaching and Research, 2022, 13(4):826-833.
[4]. Xiao S. An Analysis of Political Implications in Animal Farm from the Perspective of New Historicism[J].International Journal of Linguistics, Literature and Translation, 2022, 5(3):102-107.
[5]. Li Huifang, Bao Chenglian. An Analysis of Napoleon's Tripartite Personality in Animal Farm from the Perspective of Psychoanalysis[J]. Journal of Sociology and Ethnology, 2021, 3(5).
[6]. Marks Peter. Are some more equal than others? Animated and animatronic adaptations of;Animal Farm[J].Textual Practice, 2021, 35(10):1667-1683.
[7]. Shaikh Noman. Symbolic political exploitation in George Orwell’s Animal Farm[J]. Motifs: A Peer Reviewed International Journal of English Studies, 2021, 7(1):98-109.
[8]. Ma Guocheng. Symbolism in the Absurdity of Animal Farm[J]. The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2020, 2(3).
[9]. T. A. Dijk, W. Kintsch. “Strategies of discourse comprehension.” (1986).
[10]. R. Beaugrande, W. Dressler. “Introduction to text linguistics.” (1981).
[11]. J. Hoek. “Making sense of discourse: On discourse segmentation and the linguistic marking of coherence relations.” (2018).
[12]. Sam Wolyn and S. Simske. “Character Relationship Mapping in Major Fictional Works Using Text Analysis Methods.” ACM Symposium on Document Engineering (2023).
[13]. Darina Gold, Venelin Kovatchev et al. “Annotating and analyzing the interactions between meaning relations.” LAW@ACL (2019).
[14]. P. Sun. “Animal Images and Metaphors in Animal Farm.” (2015). 01-07.
[15]. Rumeng Dai.An Analysis of Animal Farm from the Perspective of Defamiliarization[J].The Frontiers of Society, Science and Technology, 2020, 2(2).
Cite this article
Meng,A. (2024). The Coherence Relations of "Mollie" in Animal Farm under Segmented Discourse Representation Theory(SDRT). Communications in Humanities Research,63,188-196.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).