Research Article
Open access
Published on 19 December 2024
Download pdf
Zhong,Z. (2024). Balance Nature and Culture: Key to Ease Tensions Between Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Communications in Humanities Research,64,11-16.
Export citation

Balance Nature and Culture: Key to Ease Tensions Between Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas

Zhengle Zhong *,1,
  • 1 Southwest University

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2024.18491

Abstract

Indigenous peoples have long-standing connections to their lands, however, the establishment of protected areas has often led to their exclusion and marginalization. This review examines the complicated relationship between Indigenous peoples and protected areas, highlighting the thresholds during historical conflicts that intensified tensions. As the number of protected areas has increased globally, wildlife biodiversity remains at risk. The article argues that participatory efforts involving Indigenous peoples often play a crucial role in maintaining biodiversity. It explores the challenges Indigenous peoples are confronted with - that their opinions are inadequately considered and economic profits are often prioritized over their rights - under the existing policy framework and market-oriented activities. The article advocates for a collaborative methodology that integrates indigenous knowledge and rights into protected area management, emphasizing the benefits of joint efforts. It calls for a reevaluation of current approaches to managing protected areas and a broader recognition of the importance of seeking for a balance between nature and culture, fostering a sustainable future for both biodiversity and indigenous communities.

Keywords

Indigenous peoples, protected areas, conflicts, balance

[1]. United Nations. (2021). State of the World’s Indigenous Peoples: Rights to Lands, Territories and Resources (1st ed). United Nations Publications.

[2]. Protected Planet. (2024). October 2024 update of the WDPA, WD-OECM and GD-PAME. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en/resources/october-2024-update-of-the-wdpa-wd-oecm-and-gd-pame

[3]. Protected Planet. (2024). Discover the world’s protected and conserved areas. https://www.protectedplanet.net/en

[4]. World Bank. (2024). Poverty. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/poverty/overview

[5]. World Bank. (2023). Indigenous Peoples. https://www.worldbank.org/en/topic/indigenouspeoples

[6]. BirdLife International. (2024). Indigenous People’s lands may contribute significantly to global biodiversity conservation.https://datazone.birdlife.org/sowb/casestudy/indigenous-peoples-lands-may-contribute-significantly-to-global-biodiversity-conservation

[7]. Garnett, S. T., Burgess, N. D., Fa, J. E., Fernández-Llamazares, Á., Molnár, Z., Robinson, C. J., Watson, J. E. M., Zander, K. K., Austin, B., Brondizio, E. S., Collier, N. F., Duncan, T., Ellis, E., Geyle, H., Jackson, M. V., Jonas, H., Malmer, P., McGowan, B., Sivongxay, A., & Leiper, I. (2018). A spatial overview of the global importance of Indigenous lands for conservation. Nature Sustainability, 1(7), 369–374. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-018-0100-6

[8]. Spence, M. D. (1999). Dispossessing the wilderness: Indian removal and the making of the national parks. Oxford University Press.

[9]. Dowie, M. (2011). Conservation refugees: the hundred-year conflict between global conservation and native peoples (First MIT Press paperback). The MIT Press.

[10]. Brockington, D., & Igoe, J. (2006). Eviction for Conservation: A Global Overview. Conservation and Society, 4(3), 424. https://journals.lww.com/coas/fulltext/2006/04030/eviction_for_conservation__a_global_overview.7.aspx

[11]. West, P., Igoe, J., & Brockington, D. (2006). Parks and Peoples: The Social Impact of Protected Areas. Annual Review of Anthropology, 35(1), 251–277. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.anthro.35.081705.123308

[12]. Toledo, V. M. (2013). Indigenous Peoples and Biodiversity. In Encyclopedia of Biodiversity (pp. 269–278). Elsevier. https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-384719-5.00299-9

[13]. Maass, P. (2005). The cultural context of biodiversity conservation. Valuation and Conservation of Biodiversity, pp 315-342. https://doi.org/10.1007/3-540-27138-4_15

[14]. Magnúsdóttir 1980-, K. (2013). Guests in their Homeland: The situation of the Topnaar community, the traditional but not legal residents in the Namib Naukluft Park [Thesis]. https://skemman.is/handle/1946/14991

[15]. Colchester, M. (2003). Salvaging nature: indigenous peoples, protected areas and biodiversity conservation. World Rainforest Movement ; Forest Peoples Programme.

[16]. Heise, U., Christensen, J., & Niemann, M. (Eds.). (2017). Our ancestors’ dystopia now: indigenous conservation and the Anthropocene. In The Routledge Companion to the Environmental Humanities (0 ed., pp. 222–231). Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315766355-32

[17]. Kemf, E. (Ed.). (1993). The law of the mother: protecting indigenous peoples in protected areas. Sierra Club Books.

[18]. Zeppel, H. D. (Ed.). (2006). Indigenous Ecotourism: Sustainable Development and Management (1st ed.). CABI. https://doi.org/10.1079/9781845931247.0000

[19]. Coria, J., & Calfucura, E. (2012). Ecotourism and the development of indigenous communities: The good, the bad, and the ugly. Ecological Economics, 73, 47–55. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2011.10.024

[20]. United Nations. (2002). INTERNATIONAL YEAR OF ECOTOURISM 2002 LAUNCHED AT HEADQUARTERS EVENT. https://press.un.org/en/2002/envdev607.doc.htm

[21]. Butler, R., & Hinch, T. D. (2007). Tourism and indigenous peoples: issues and implications (1st ed). Butterworth-Heinemann.

[22]. Thapa, R. (2015). The Burning Issues of Conflict: A Case Study of Chitwan National Park, Nepal. International Journal of Science and Research (IJSR), 5, 6–391.

[23]. Negi, C. S., & Nautiya1, S. (2003). Indigenous peoples, biological diversity and protected area management — policy framework towards resolving conflicts. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 10(2), 169–179. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504500309469795

[24]. Thomas, L. (2022). The Intersectional Environmentalist. Little, Brown and Company.

[25]. Vaccaro, I., Beltran, O., & Paquet, P.-A. (2013). Political Ecology of Conservation: some theoretical genealogies. Journal of Political Ecology, 20, 255–272. https://doi.org/10.2458/v20i1.21748

Cite this article

Zhong,Z. (2024). Balance Nature and Culture: Key to Ease Tensions Between Indigenous Peoples and Protected Areas. Communications in Humanities Research,64,11-16.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies

Conference website: https://2024.icihcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-787-4(Print) / 978-1-83558-788-1(Online)
Conference date: 29 November 2024
Editor:Heidi Gregory-Mina
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.64
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).