1. Introduction
1.1. The Dual Nature of Memes: Cohesion vs. Isolation
In recent years, the rapid development of social media has enhanced interactions among young people, leading to the emergence of a distinct online culture. Humor has become a central element of these conversations, particularly within this demographic. Memes generated in online spaces significantly influence how young people behave and communicate in their daily lives.
A "meme" is a viral phenomenon that spreads swiftly through social media and internet platforms. Typically consisting of images, videos, or text paired with humorous, ironic, or relatable content, memes often draw upon cultural references, current events, or in-group jokes to engage and entertain users [1]. They serve as a medium for shared expression within online communities, fostering a sense of belonging and understanding. Memes reflect the dynamic and evolving nature of internet culture, continually developing as new ones emerge and old ones fade.
The Meme Theory of Richard Dawkins [2] might be able to give us some insight. Memes achieve rapid and widespread circulation on social media through interactive mechanisms such as likes, shares, and comments, creating a viral effect. They are often utilized by specific communities to establish shared cultural symbols and identities [3].
For instance, certain memes may circulate exclusively within particular interest groups or cultural circles. This phenomenon can enhance group cohesion but may simultaneously weaken the members' communication with the outside world [4]. Additionally, memes can simplify complex social phenomena or emotions through humor or exaggeration, making them easier to understand and accept.
1.2. The psychological impact of memes on social identity
From the perspectives of psychology and communication studies, memes are considered self-replicating units of social information, culture, and behavior patterns. Through imitation, re-creation, and transmission, they shape both individual and group behaviors, becoming a modern medium for cultural exchange and a tool for social interaction due to their efficiency and widespread influence.
Memes often impact an individual’s social identity through imitation. In online environments, users share and create memes to foster group identity and reinforce social belonging. However, the rapid dissemination of information on social media, especially in the absence of effective moderation, can facilitate the spread of harmful memes. This lack of oversight can lead to the proliferation of adverse content with significant social consequences [4].
1.3. The dark side of humor: Trivializaiton of serious issues
One notable issue is the entertainment-based trivialization of diseases among young people, particularly in cyberspace [5]. Serious conditions such as depression, suicide, and Down syndrome are often subjects of jokes and memes. This trend not only disregards the feelings of those affected but also hinders their recovery and treatment, eroding societal empathy and responsibility.
1.4. Aims and scope of the study
Building on previous research, this paper aims to explore the mechanisms and impacts of disease trivialization from psychological, sociological, and communication perspectives while examining potential solutions to address this growing concern.
2. Literature Review
2.1. The role of humor in mental health
Humor is a vital element of social culture, playing crucial roles in emotional regulation, group cohesion, cultural transmission, and social critique. It serves as an effective mechanism for alleviating stress, anxiety, and negative emotions, helping individuals reframe problems and confront challenges more easily. Research indicates that humor reduces psychological burdens, promotes mental health, and enhances overall life satisfaction. Additionally, it strengthens interpersonal connections and emotional bonds within groups, allowing individuals to diffuse awkward situations and ease tension. Furthermore, humor acts as a medium for cultural expression, disseminating and shaping cultural values through jokes, satire, and cartoons. [6] [7]
2.2. Trivialization of serious diseases
However, the trend of trivializing serious diseases has led to alienation in interpersonal relationships and a diminished sense of care for affected individuals [8]. This phenomenon involves discussing serious health issues, such as depression, suicide, and Down syndrome, in a playful manner, particularly among young people on online platforms. [9] [10]
2.2.1. Depression
Depression, a common mental illness, significantly affects mood and behavior, with symptoms including persistent low mood, loss of interest, and, in severe cases, suicidal ideation [11].
2.2.2. Suicide
The World Health Organization (WHO) identifies suicide as a leading cause of death globally, with a notable percentage of individuals with depression having experienced suicidal behaviors [12]. Yet, depression is often trivialized online, being described as simply “being in a bad mood.” [13] Young people frequently use phrases like “I’m so depressed” or joke about suicide, which minimizes the seriousness of these conditions and leads to a lack of understanding and compassion for those truly suffering.
This trivialization can diminish attention to mental health issues, making it harder for affected individuals to receive necessary support. Casual remarks about suicide, while often intended as jokes, trivialize its seriousness and can cause those genuinely struggling to feel their pain is dismissed, exacerbating their isolation [14].
2.2.3. Down syndrome
Similarly, Down syndrome, caused by an extra chromosome, is often mischaracterized in informal contexts, with the term used to describe someone as “clumsy” or “stupid.” [15] This trivialization exacerbates discrimination and perpetuates harmful stereotypes, leading to a lack of societal understanding and compassion for individuals with Down syndrome, ultimately hindering advocacy efforts [16].
2.2.4. Diseases trivializatoin
The amplification effect of social media plays a crucial role in spreading disease trivialization [17]. The rapid dissemination of memes and humorous content about diseases allows such material to gain visibility quickly, often at the expense of empathy for affected individuals. Young users, seeking collective recognition, may engage in this behavior, believing it strengthens their social connections.
Moreover, the culture of dark humor and satire often addresses taboo topics through mockery, which may lead to emotional numbness within society. Algorithmic recommendations on social media [18] reinforce this trend by suggesting similar content based on user preferences, [19] further isolating users from serious discussions.
Ultimately, the trivialization of diseases can desensitize individuals to the emotional gravity of these issues, reducing empathy and diminishing societal compassion. This emotional dilution can foster public misconceptions, [20] leading to prejudice against patients and potentially deterring them from seeking necessary treatment. The trivialization of serious conditions neglects the genuine experiences of patients, leaving them vulnerable to ridicule and undermining their support systems [21].
3. Discussion
In addition to the drive for group identity, the influence of social media, and a lack of awareness about related diseases, several other factors contribute to the rising phenomenon of illness trivialization.
3.1. Decline of emotional communication
In our fast-paced era of economic and technological advancement, emotional communication between individuals is declining. As life accelerates, people often overlook each other's emotional needs. What may be perceived as “jokes” could actually signal distress from young individuals seeking help. Defense mechanisms may lead them to adopt a humorous approach when disclosing inner pain, allowing them to maintain distance from their vulnerabilities. [22]
3.2. The importance of social connection
Social connection is vital for psychological well-being. Seeking group approval enhances a sense of belonging and boosts self-worth [4]. Therefore, when a cultural environment trivializes certain illnesses, individuals may feel pressured to participate, even if they disagree. This can result in cognitive dissonance, where they alter their perceptions to reconcile their discomfort with group behavior. [23]
3.3. Roles of memes in emotional expression
Memes provide a quick, informal means of emotional expression. By sharing and creating memes, users effectively convey emotions and viewpoints. These fragmented cultural symbols evoke emotional resonance and foster group identities, allowing young people to vent their feelings in a challenging environment while strengthening community bonds. When used appropriately, memes can promote positive messages and cultural values, succinctly conveying complex issues during social movements.
3.4. Regulatory Mechanisms for Memes
With proper regulatory mechanisms, memes can fulfill their cultural role effectively. Social media platforms should implement measures to ensure that meme dissemination is free of harmful content while avoiding excessive censorship that stifles creativity. A combination of artificial intelligence and human moderation can help filter out harmful memes, while promoting healthy, positive content that enriches societal discourse. [24]
3.5. Encouraging Social Responsibility
To combat the trivialization of diseases, platforms should encourage content creators to take social responsibility, avoiding the spread of negative cultural influences. Influencers can use their platforms to promote respect and discourage harmful content. Additionally, social media could develop mechanisms to identify and label content that trivializes diseases, utilizing natural language processing to analyze text and images, and enhancing user reporting functions.
3.6. Adjusting Recommendation Algorithms
Adjustments to recommendation algorithms should prioritize positive and educational content over merely popular content. Monitoring user interaction data can help mitigate the spread of negative content. Collaborating with professional organizations to promote educational resources on mental health and disease awareness can further enhance public understanding. Dedicated forums can facilitate sharing real-life experiences and accessing professional support.
3.7. Raising Public Awareness
Raising public awareness of mental health issues and intellectual disabilities is essential. Creators of entertainment about these topics must recognize the genuine pain of those they mock to diminish negative culture. Implementing mental health education in secondary schools and universities can promote awareness and compassion, preventing discrimination from the outset. [25]
3.8. Enhancing Media Literacy
Furthermore, educational initiatives should enhance public media literacy and understanding of internet culture. Programs should help users grasp the context of memes, reducing the risk of misinterpretation. Raising awareness of information accuracy and moral responsibility is crucial for ensuring the effective functioning of memes in the digital age.
4. Conclusion
The entertainment of illness may serve as a way for young people to express their emotions and seek attention in an era characterized by interpersonal indifference. This behavior can reflect their pain and helplessness but fails to address their psychological needs or mitigate the harm inflicted on those affected. Additionally, this trend can undermine societal empathy, deepening the alienation between individuals.
A comprehensive solution should enhance platform censorship to prevent the spread of illness entertainment while promoting respect and understanding for the pain of others. Although individuals with health conditions constitute a small segment of the population, their rights are equally important. They deserve respect and compassion, not malicious jokes. Society must also combat this phenomenon through education and advocacy. By fostering a deeper understanding of others' suffering, we can enhance empathy and improve interpersonal relationships. This approach will create a more supportive environment for patients whose conditions have been trivialized, ultimately facilitating their healing process.
Acknowledgement
This paper builds on my recent work discussing the stigma faced by individuals with bipolar disorder—topics that are deeply important to me. I’m honored to be able to speak about them freely.
While I value many aspects of our culture, I believe we can strive for a more compassionate society. With a little effort, we can make the world a kinder place.
All it takes is a willingness to try.
References
[1]. Valensise, C. M., Serra, A., Galeazzi, A., Etta, G., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021). Entropy and complexity unveil the landscape of memes evolution. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20022.
[2]. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
[3]. Lim, S., & Reeves, S. (2010). The language of Web 2.0: Social networking and microblogging. In M. P. O'Donnell, S. J. Read, & R. K. O'Donnell (Eds.), Web 2.0: New directions in communication (pp. 71-90). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[4]. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
[5]. Pavelko, A., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). That’s so OCD: The effects of disease trivialization via social media on user perceptions and impression formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 87-94.
[6]. Mathews, L. (2016). Role of humor in emotion regulation: Differential effects of adaptive and maladaptive forms of humor. The City University of New York: United States.
[7]. Cheung, F. M., & Yue, X. D. (2012). Humor styles, emotion regulation and subjective well-being in young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior.
[8]. Allen, K. A., Ryan, T., Gray, D. L., McInerney, D. M., & Waters, L. (2020). Social Media Use and Social Connectedness in Adolescents: The Positives and the Potential Pitfalls. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(1), 18-31.
[9]. Muyang Psychology. (2024, May 14). How the online society distorts our perception of mental illness. WeChat. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=Mzg4MjgwOTU0OQ==&mid=2247484324&idx=1&sn=dc5e7b1599f9510bb66626f22416b2b6
[10]. Stigma and discrimination. (2018). The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(8), 659-660.
[11]. World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates.
[12]. World Health Organization. (2019). Suicide in the world: Global Health Estimates.
[13]. Kushner, I., et al. (2010). The trivialization of diagnosis. Journal of Hospital Medicine.
[14]. Pavelko, R. L., Myrick, J. G., & Branscombe, N. R. (2020). Measuring Trivialization of Mental Illness: Developing a Scale of Perceptions that Mental Illness Symptoms are Beneficial. Health Communication.
[15]. Med Humanit. (2021). Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture.
[16]. Farrelly, S., Clement, S., Gabbidon, J., Jeffery, D., Dockery, L., Lassman, F., Brohan, E., Henderson, R. C., Williams, P., Howard, L. M., & Thornicroft, G. (2014). Anticipated and experienced discrimination amongst people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 157.
[17]. Purba, A. K., Thomson, R. M., Henery, P. M., Pearce, A., Henderson, M., & Katikireddi, S. V. (2023). Social media use and health risk behaviours in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 383, Article number: e073552.
[18]. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Echo chambers: Bush v. Gore, impeachment, and beyond. Stanford Law Review, 52(5), 1477-1528.
[19]. Holton, A., & Moloney, M. (2018). The role of social media in amplifying societal desensitization to death and serious illness. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(3), 297-309.
[20]. Smith, R., & Stewart, K. (2018). The impact of humorous health messages on audience engagement and knowledge gain. Health Communication, 33(7), 803-814.
[21]. Cowan, G. (2019). The role of humor in online communication. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(3).
[22]. Twenge, J. M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976–2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(7), 883-897.
[23]. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
[24]. Metzger, M. J. (2007). Toward a regulatory theory of technology: The case of content moderation and the governance of online intermediaries. Journal of Information Policy, 7, 1-31.
[25]. Evans, S. W., Serpell, Z. N., Schultz, J., Schultz, P., Von der Embse, N., & Sugai, D. (2018). Implementing mental health services in schools: Advancing the concept of school-wide, tiered systems of support. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 1-13.
Cite this article
Wu,X.;Song,Y.;Zhao,X. (2024). Exploring Memes as a Form of Illness Trivialization in Young People: Social and Psychological Consequences—A Literature Review. Communications in Humanities Research,64,50-55.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).
References
[1]. Valensise, C. M., Serra, A., Galeazzi, A., Etta, G., Cinelli, M., & Quattrociocchi, W. (2021). Entropy and complexity unveil the landscape of memes evolution. Scientific Reports, 11(1), 20022.
[2]. Dawkins, R. (1976). The Selfish Gene. Oxford University Press.
[3]. Lim, S., & Reeves, S. (2010). The language of Web 2.0: Social networking and microblogging. In M. P. O'Donnell, S. J. Read, & R. K. O'Donnell (Eds.), Web 2.0: New directions in communication (pp. 71-90). Emerald Group Publishing Limited.
[4]. Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: Desire for interpersonal attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological Bulletin, 117(3), 497-529.
[5]. Pavelko, A., & Myrick, J. G. (2015). That’s so OCD: The effects of disease trivialization via social media on user perceptions and impression formation. Computers in Human Behavior, 51, 87-94.
[6]. Mathews, L. (2016). Role of humor in emotion regulation: Differential effects of adaptive and maladaptive forms of humor. The City University of New York: United States.
[7]. Cheung, F. M., & Yue, X. D. (2012). Humor styles, emotion regulation and subjective well-being in young adults. Archives of Sexual Behavior.
[8]. Allen, K. A., Ryan, T., Gray, D. L., McInerney, D. M., & Waters, L. (2020). Social Media Use and Social Connectedness in Adolescents: The Positives and the Potential Pitfalls. The Australian Educational and Developmental Psychologist, 31(1), 18-31.
[9]. Muyang Psychology. (2024, May 14). How the online society distorts our perception of mental illness. WeChat. https://mp.weixin.qq.com/s?__biz=Mzg4MjgwOTU0OQ==&mid=2247484324&idx=1&sn=dc5e7b1599f9510bb66626f22416b2b6
[10]. Stigma and discrimination. (2018). The Lancet Psychiatry, 5(8), 659-660.
[11]. World Health Organization. (2017). Depression and other common mental disorders: Global health estimates.
[12]. World Health Organization. (2019). Suicide in the world: Global Health Estimates.
[13]. Kushner, I., et al. (2010). The trivialization of diagnosis. Journal of Hospital Medicine.
[14]. Pavelko, R. L., Myrick, J. G., & Branscombe, N. R. (2020). Measuring Trivialization of Mental Illness: Developing a Scale of Perceptions that Mental Illness Symptoms are Beneficial. Health Communication.
[15]. Med Humanit. (2021). Hostile environments? Down’s syndrome and genetic screening in contemporary culture.
[16]. Farrelly, S., Clement, S., Gabbidon, J., Jeffery, D., Dockery, L., Lassman, F., Brohan, E., Henderson, R. C., Williams, P., Howard, L. M., & Thornicroft, G. (2014). Anticipated and experienced discrimination amongst people with schizophrenia, bipolar disorder and major depressive disorder: A cross-sectional study. BMC Psychiatry, 14, 157.
[17]. Purba, A. K., Thomson, R. M., Henery, P. M., Pearce, A., Henderson, M., & Katikireddi, S. V. (2023). Social media use and health risk behaviours in young people: systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ, 383, Article number: e073552.
[18]. Sunstein, C. R. (2001). Echo chambers: Bush v. Gore, impeachment, and beyond. Stanford Law Review, 52(5), 1477-1528.
[19]. Holton, A., & Moloney, M. (2018). The role of social media in amplifying societal desensitization to death and serious illness. Journal of Health Psychology, 23(3), 297-309.
[20]. Smith, R., & Stewart, K. (2018). The impact of humorous health messages on audience engagement and knowledge gain. Health Communication, 33(7), 803-814.
[21]. Cowan, G. (2019). The role of humor in online communication. Cyberpsychology: Journal of Psychosocial Research on Cyberspace, 13(3).
[22]. Twenge, J. M., & Kasser, T. (2013). Generational changes in materialism and work centrality, 1976–2007: Associations with temporal changes in societal insecurity and materialistic role modeling. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 39(7), 883-897.
[23]. Brewer, M. B. (1991). The social self: On being the same and different at the same time. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 17(5), 475-482.
[24]. Metzger, M. J. (2007). Toward a regulatory theory of technology: The case of content moderation and the governance of online intermediaries. Journal of Information Policy, 7, 1-31.
[25]. Evans, S. W., Serpell, Z. N., Schultz, J., Schultz, P., Von der Embse, N., & Sugai, D. (2018). Implementing mental health services in schools: Advancing the concept of school-wide, tiered systems of support. School Psychology Review, 47(1), 1-13.