Download pdf
The Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Platform Algorithms Promoting Personalized Recommendations – From the Echo Chamber to the Deep Impact of Ideological Polarization
- 1 Syracuse University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
The convenience of society has increased significantly with the development of the Internet and social media. Nonetheless, it has also contributed to the rapid spread of information and the intensification of opinion polarization. This paper investigates how personalized recommendation algorithms can contribute to the further polarization of users' views through information filtering, the echo chamber effect, and the spiral of silence mechanism. The findings presented in the research indicate that when participants encounter information that contradicts their existing beliefs, rather than adopting a more neutral stance, they tend to strengthen their initial viewpoints. At the same time, ordinary users chose to remain silent for fear of online harassment, allowing extreme voices to dominate the network. This paper concludes that personalized recommendation algorithms enhance user experience, limit exposure to multiple viewpoints, and exacerbate social fragmentation. To tackle this issue, it is advisable for individuals to enhance their media literacy and proactively interact with a variety of viewpoints. Additionally, platforms and policymakers ought to modify their algorithms to facilitate the spread of diverse information, thereby fostering a more transparent communication landscape
Keywords
Personalized recommendation algorithms, Information filtering, Echo chamber effect, Spiral of silence, Media literacy
[1]. Rabb, N., Cowen, L., & de Ruiter, J. P. (2023). Investigating the effect of selective exposure, audience fragmentation, and echo-chambers on polarization in dynamic media ecosystems. Applied Network Science, 8(1), 78
[2]. Wang, X., & Song, Y. (2020). Viral misinformation and echo chambers: the diffusion of rumors about genetically modified organisms on social media. [Viral misinformation and echo chambers] Internet Research, 30(5), 1547-1564.
[3]. Hachten, W. A. (2015). The World News Prism: Digital, Social and Interactive. John Wiley &. Sons, Incorporated, John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated.
[4]. Kratzke, N. (2023). How to Find Orchestrated Trolls? A Case Study on Identifying Polarized Twitter Echo Chambers. Computers, 12(3), 57.
[5]. Eceiza, E. U., & Ibañez, I. E. (2021). POLARIZATION AND ECHO CHAMBERS IN. #LEYDEEUTANASIA DEBATE ON TWITTER. [LA POLARIZACIÓN Y ECHO CHAMBERS EN EL DEBATE DE LA #LEYDEEUTANASIA EN TWITTER A POLARIZAÇAO E ECHO CHAMBERS NO DEBATE DA#LEYDEEUTANASIA NO TWITTER] Revista De Comunicación De La SEECI, (54), 187-204.
[6]. Gao, Y., Liu, F., & Gao, L. (2023). Echo chamber effects on short video platforms. Scientific. Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 13(1), 6282.
[7]. Avin, C., Daltrophe, H., & Lotker, Z. (2024). On the impossibility of breaking the echo chamber. effect in social media using regulation. Scientific Reports (Nature Publisher Group), 14(1), 1107.
[8]. C, T. N. (2020). ECHO CHAMBERS AND EPISTEMIC BUBBLES. Episteme, 17(2), 141-161.
[9]. Wolfowicz, M., Weisburd, D., & Hasisi, B. (2023). Examining the interactive effects of the filter. bubble and the echo chamber on radicalization. Journal of Experimental Criminology, 19(1), 119-141.
[10]. Jasny, L., Waggle, J., & Fisher, D. R. (2015). An empirical examination of echo chambers in US climate policy networks. Nature Climate Change, 5(8), 782-786.
Cite this article
Yan,X. (2025). The Advantages and Disadvantages of Internet Platform Algorithms Promoting Personalized Recommendations – From the Echo Chamber to the Deep Impact of Ideological Polarization. Communications in Humanities Research,62,46-51.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).