Download pdf
Assessing the Effectiveness of Current Mainstream English Teaching Methods in Economically Disadvantaged Regions of China
- 1 University of Michigan – Ann Arbor
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
While extensive research has explored English teaching methods in urban China, their applicability and effectiveness in rural areas remain underexamined. This study addresses this gap by analyzing the challenges and effectiveness of mainstream methods such as Grammar-Translation Method (GTM), Communicative Language Teaching (CLT), and Task-Based Language Teaching (TBLT) in economically disadvantaged regions. The research utilizes theoretical analysis, drawing on secondary data from prior studies and applying frameworks like Krashen’s Input Hypothesis and Vygotsky’s Sociocultural Theory. It examines rural students' learning environments, including resource deficiencies, underqualified teachers, and limited English exposure. The findings indicate that while GTM is effective for improving grammar and reading, it fails to build communicative competence or sustain student motivation. CLT and TBLT show potential but are constrained by resource and expertise deficiencies prevalent in rural settings. The study concludes that integrating online technology, enhancing teacher training, and fostering community-based initiatives could improve the efficacy of English teaching in rural China, bridging the educational gap between urban and rural areas.
Keywords
TESOL, Rural teaching, Urban-rural disparity, Teaching methods
[1]. Milawati.(2019). Grammar Translation Method: Current Practice In EFL Context. Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics. Vol. 4(1). .
[2]. Hu, Y. (2007). China’s foreign language policy on primary English education: What’s behind it?. Language Policy, 6, 359-376.
[3]. Yao, C. (2022). Is a one-way English immersion teaching approach equitable to those Chinese non-English major students from rural areas?. Education and Urban Society, 54(4), 470-486.
[4]. Ma, L., Xiao, L., & Liu, J. (2024). Motivational beliefs of urban and rural students in English as a foreign language learning: The case of China. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(5), 1524-1537.
[5]. Fang, F. (2010). A discussion on developing students’ communicative competence in college English teaching in China. Journal of language teaching and research, 1(2), 111-116.
[6]. Butler, Y. G. (2014). Parental factors and early English education as a foreign language: A case study in Mainland China. Research papers in education, 29(4), 410-437.
[7]. Krashen, Stephen. (1982). Principles and Practice in Second Language Acquisition.
[8]. Xiao, L. X. (2009). A new paradigm of teaching English in China: An Eclectic Model. The Asian EFL Journal, 11(1), 271-291.
[9]. Qi, G. Y. (2016). The importance of English in primary school education in China: perceptions of students. Multilingual Education, 6, 1-18.
[10]. Hansen, M. H. (2012). Recent trends in Chinese rural education: the disturbing rural–urban disparities and the measures to meet them. In Towards a New Development Paradigm in Twenty-First Century China (pp. 165-178). Routledge.
[11]. Wu, X., & Tarc, P. (2024). Challenges and possibilities in English language learning of rural lower-class Chinese college students: the effect of capital, habitus, and fields. Journal of Multilingual and Multicultural Development, 45(4), 957-972.
Cite this article
Jiang,W. (2025). Assessing the Effectiveness of Current Mainstream English Teaching Methods in Economically Disadvantaged Regions of China. Communications in Humanities Research,61,63-70.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).