Research Article
Open access
Published on 13 March 2025
Download pdf
Zhou,N. (2025). Pregnancy Discrimination and 1970s Feminism. Communications in Humanities Research,56,78-81.
Export citation

Pregnancy Discrimination and 1970s Feminism

Ning Zhou *,1,
  • 1 Department of business, City University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, 518057, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2024.21410

Abstract

The paper discusses the feminist movement of the 1970s, focusing on its approach to pregnancy discrimination, which initially did not emerge as a top priority. The work highlights that, while pregnancy discrimination was indeed an important issue, it took time to come into prominence and be represented within the feminist agenda until the final passage of the Pregnancy Discrimination Act of 1978-a poignant piece of legislation. By analyzing feminist manifestos, legislative records, and key writings from prominent feminists in ways that capture, at each stage, how the movement adapted to various forms of discrimination. The adaptation shows how evolving priorities within the feminist movement influenced its overall strategy aimed at winning the struggle for gender equality. It also highlights how ongoing feminist activism has been changing through the resurgence against new challenges in movements that fight for broader social justice. These changes show the dynamic nature of feminist advocacy and its struggle for progress.

Keywords

Feminism, Pregnancy Discrimination Act, Gender Equality, 1970s Feminist Movement, Workplace Discrimination

[1]. Betty Friedan, The Feminine Mystique (New York: W.W. Norton, 1963).

[2]. Ruth Bader Ginsburg, "Sex Bias in the U.S. Code," Human Rights 7, no. 1 (1977): 14-20.

[3]. General Electric Co. v. Gilbert, 429 U.S. 125 (1976).

[4]. U.S. Congress, "Legislation to Prohibit Sex Discrimination on the Basis of Pregnancy," 1978.

[5]. Dorothy Sue Cobble, "Feminism and the Labor Movement: A Century of Collaboration and Conflict," New Labor Forum 20, no. 1 (2011): 32-41.

[6]. Victoria Margree, "Shulamith Firestone: Why the Radical Feminist Who Wanted to Abolish Pregnancy Remains Relevant," The Conversation, April 25, 2019.

[7]. Redstockings, "Redstockings Manifesto," 1969.

[8]. Susan Deller Ross, "Pregnancy and Discrimination," Journal of Family Law 16 (1978): 95-110.

Cite this article

Zhou,N. (2025). Pregnancy Discrimination and 1970s Feminism. Communications in Humanities Research,56,78-81.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies

Conference website: https://2024.icihcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-977-9(Print) / 978-1-83558-978-6(Online)
Conference date: 29 November 2024
Editor:Heidi Gregory-Mina
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.56
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).