Download pdf
Evolutionary Psychology: An Analysis of the Multifaceted Factors Influencing Women's Mating Preferences
- 1 Dana Hall School
- 2 Shanghai Pinghe School
- 3 High School Affiliated to Shanghai Jiao Tong University
- 4 UWC Atlantic College
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Mate choice is pivotal in shaping the quality of marriages and family structures. This paper explores the psychology behind women's selection of spouses in the context of evolving societal norms and gender roles, particularly within the dynamic landscape of contemporary China. Drawing upon evolutionary psychology, sociology, and social learning theories, it investigates the multifaceted factors influencing women's mating preferences, including biological characteristics, socioeconomic status, and personality traits. Additionally, the paper examines the role of familial influence, societal expectations, and gender roles in shaping mate selection criteria. Through a comprehensive literature review and theoretical analysis, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the complex interplay between individual psychology, social dynamics, and cultural contexts in the process of mate selection.
Keywords
Mate choice, Women's mating preferences, Evolutionary psychology, Socioeconomic status, Psychological mechanisms
[1]. DARWIN, C. (2019). Origin of species. BIG CHEESE Books.
[2]. Edwards J. (1969). Familial behaviors as social exchange. J. Marriage Fam. 31, 518–526. 10.2307/349775
[3]. Eshleman, A. (2004). Responsibility for character. Philosophical Topics, 32(1/2), 65-94.
[4]. Hayes A. F. AGE preference for same-sex and opposite-sex partners[J. Journal of social psychology.1995.135:125-133.]
[5]. Trivers, Robert L. "Parental investment and sexual selection." Sexual selection and the descent of man. Routledge, 2017. 136-179.
[6]. Buss, D. M. (1998). Sexual strategies theory: Historical origins and current status. Journal of Sex Research, 35(1), 19-31. https://doi.org/10.1080/00224499809551914
[7]. Tian Qian. (2012). Research on Chinese women's mating tendency [D] (Doctoral dissertation, Fudan University).
[8]. Gangestad, Steven W. “Sexual selection, good genes, and human mating.” Conceptual Challenges in Evolutionary Psychology, 2001, pp. 143–178, https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0618-7_6.
[9]. Buss, D. M. (1989). Sex differences in human mate preferences: Evolutionary hypotheses tested in 37 cultures. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 12(1), 1–14. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0140525x00023992
[10]. Brase, Gary L. "Cues of parental investment as a factor in attractiveness." Evolution and Human Behavior 27.2 (2006): 145-157
[11]. Buss, D. M., & Schmitt, D. P. (1993). Sexual strategies theory: An evolutionary perspective on human mating. Psychological Review, 100, 204-232.
[12]. Buss, David M., and Todd K. Shackelford. “Attractive women want it all: Good genes, economic investment, parenting proclivities, and emotional commitment.” Evolutionary Psychology, vol. 6, no. 1, 1 Jan. 2008, p. 147470490800600, https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600116.
[13]. La Cerra, Peggy, and Robert Kurzban. "The structure of scientific revolutions and the nature of the adapted mind." Psychological Inquiry 6.1 (1995): 62-65.
[14]. TRIVERS, ROBERT L. “Parent-offspring conflict.” American Zoologist, vol. 14, no. 1, Feb. 1974, pp. 249–264, https://doi.org/10.1093/icb/14.1.249.
[15]. Apostolou, Menelaos. “Parent-offspring conflict over mating: The case of family background.” Evolutionary Psychology, vol. 6, no. 3, 1 July 2008, p. 147470490800600, https://doi.org/10.1177/147470490800600310.
[16]. Bereczkei, T, et al. “Homogamy, genetic similarity, and imprinting; parental influence on mate choice preferences.” Personality and Individual Differences, vol. 33, no. 5, Oct. 2002, pp. 677–690, https://doi.org/10.1016/s0191-8869(01)00182-9.
[17]. Cameron, Samuel, and Alan Collins. “Estimates of a hedonic ageing equation for partner search.” Kyklos, vol. 50, no. 3, Aug. 1997, pp. 409–418, https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-6435.00023.
[18]. Regan, Pamela C. “What if you can’t get what you want? willingness to compromise ideal mate selection standards as a function of sex, mate value, and relationship context.” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, vol. 24, no. 12, Dec. 1998, pp. 1294–1303, https://doi.org/10.1177/01461672982412004.
[19]. Foo, Y. Z., Simmons, L. W., & Rhodes, G. (2017). The relationship between health and mating success in humans. Royal Society Open Science, 4(1), 160603. https://doi.org/10.1098/rsos.160603
[20]. Levesque, Gabrielle. “Care, Gender Inequality and Resistance : A Foucauldian Reading of Carol Gilligan’s Ethic of Care.” T. University of British Columbia, 2013. Web. 1 July 2024. <https://open.library.ubc.ca/collections/ubctheses/24/items/1.0074112>. Electronic Theses and Dissertations (ETDs) 2008+.
[21]. Croft, A., Schmader, T., Beall, A., & Schaller, M. (2019). Breadwinner Seeks Bottle Warmer: How Women’s Future Aspirations and Expectations Predict Their Current Mate Preferences. Sex Roles, 82(11-12). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-019-01080-6
[22]. Eagly, A. H., Eastwick, P. W., & Johannesen-Schmidt, M. (2009). Possible Selves in Marital Roles: The Impact of the Anticipated Division of Labor on the Mate Preferences of Women and Men. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 35(4), 403–414. https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167208329696
[23]. Coleman, James S. “Social Capital in the creation of human capital.” American Journal of Sociology, vol. 94, Jan. 1988, https://doi.org/10.1086/228943.
[24]. Entwisle, Doris R., and Nan Marie Astone. “Some practical guidelines for measuring youth’s race/ethnicity and socioeconomic status.” Child Development, vol. 65, no. 6, Dec. 1994, p. 1521, https://doi.org/10.2307/1131278.
[25]. Guo, Guang, and Kathleen Mullan Harris. “The mechanisms mediating the effects of poverty on children’s intellectual development.” Demography, vol. 37, no. 4, 1 Nov. 2000, pp. 431–447, https://doi.org/10.1353/dem.2000.0005.
[26]. Bradley, Robert H., and Robert F. Corwyn. “Socioeconomic status and child development.” Annual Review of Psychology, vol. 53, no. 1, Feb. 2002, pp. 371–399, https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.psych.53.100901.135233.
[27]. March, Evita, and Rachel Grieve. “Social‐Economic theory and short‐term mate preferences: The effects of gender roles and socioeconomic status.” Australian Journal of Psychology, vol. 68, no. 4, 1 Dec. 2016, pp. 241–250, https://doi.org/10.1111/ajpy.12102.
Cite this article
Cao,Q.;Jiang,H.;Han,H.;Jin,K. (2025). Evolutionary Psychology: An Analysis of the Multifaceted Factors Influencing Women's Mating Preferences. Communications in Humanities Research,59,11-19.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).