Download pdf
The Production and Perception of Japanese Accent by Native Mandarin Speakers: A Study of Three-Mora Word Sequences Containing Devoiced Vowels
- 1 School of Japanese Studies, Tianjin Foreign Studies University, Tianjin, China
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
A growing number of native Chinese speakers are enrolling in Japanese language programs, rendering the acquisition of Japanese pitch accent a significant topic in linguistics. Despite extensive research on the perception and production of devoiced vowels, studies on Chinese learners’ perception and production of Japanese pitch accent remain limited. This study examines the perception and production of three-mora Japanese word sequences with devoiced vowels by Chinese native learners of Japanese. The results reveal that learners made fewer perceptual than articulatory errors, who tend to pronounce P0 as P3 and P1 as rising-falling type. Further analysis indicates that compared to native speakers, there is no significant difference in the pronunciation of P0, while the pitch frequency difference for P1 is smaller and for P2, it is larger. In terms of perception, learners are able to recognize the most natural pitch differences, but the perceptual difference for P0 is smaller. Moreover, no significant correlation is found between pitch accent perception and pronunciation in these sequences.
Keywords
Pitch Accent Acquisition, Production and Perception, Devoiced Vowels, Word Sequences
[1]. Liu, Z. (2017) A note on learning Japanese accent: by analysis on Mandarin speaker to learn Japanese. Inquires into Japanese language, 3: 31-43.
[2]. Strange, W. (1995) Phonetics of Second-Language Acquisition: Past, Present, Future. In 13th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences. Stockholm, Sweden. Vol 4: 76-83
[3]. Kumagai, Y., Yoshida, K. and Miwa, J. (1999) On a Decision Method of Accent Type for Japanese Learning. IPSJ SIG technical reports, 16(1998-MUS-029): 71-78.
[4]. Satou, H. (1993) Accent analysis of common Japanese words. Acoustical Science and Technology, 49(11): 775-784.
[5]. Hirayama, M. (2024) Morphological (Non-)Effect in High Vowel Devoicing in Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 28(2): 17-26.
[6]. Matsui, M. (2023) The Temporal Feature of the Base Status of Japanese Devoiced Vowels. Theoretical and Applied Linguistics at Kobe Shoin, 26: 15-31.
[7]. Byun, H. (2007) Regional and Generational Differences of High Vowel Devoicing in Japanese. Studies in the Japanese language, 3(1): 33-48.
[8]. Yoshida, N. (2004) A Phonetic Study of Japanese Vowel Devoicing [D]. Kyoto University. http://hdl.handle.net/2433/147406.
[9]. Samuel, E.M. (1953) Morphophonemics of Standard Colloquial Japanese. The Far Eastern Quarterly, 13(1): 101-104.
[10]. Hasegawa, Y. (1999) Pitch Accent and Vowel Devoicing in Japanese. In 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS-14). San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 523-526.
[11]. Toda, T. (1999) Usage and Acquisition of Accent of English Loanwords by Japanese Learners : an Analysis based on Conversational Data from English,Chinese and Korean Speakers. Studies in language and literature. Language, 36: 89-111.
[12]. Liu, J. (2010) A Study on the Acquisition of Japanese Accent by Chinese Speaking Learners: Focus on compound verb. Waseda studies in Japanese language education, 8: 15-28.
[13]. Yasuda, L.and Hayashi, R. (2011) Acquisition of vowel devoicing in Japanese as a second language by Taiwanese learners of Japanese. Journal of the Phonetic Society of Japan, 15(2): 1-10.
[14]. Hwang, H.K. and Hirayama, M. (2024) Acquisition of high vowel devoicing in Japanese: A production experiment with three and four year olds. In Interspeech 2024. Kos Island, Greece. pp. 4180-4183.
[15]. Jeff, P. (2018) A Japanese pitch accent practice program and L1 influence on pitch accent acquisition. In The 92nd Annual Meeting of the Linguistic Society of America. Salt Lake City, USA. pp. 1-12
[16]. Whalen, D.H. (1999) Three Lines of Evidence for Direct Links Between Production and Perception. In 14th International Congress of Phonetic Sciences (ICPhS-14). San Francisco, CA, USA. pp. 1257-1260.
[17]. Sharon, P. and Camillia, B. (2011) The Relation Between Perception and Production in L2 Phonological Processing. In Interspeech 2011, 12th Annual Conference of the International Speech Communication Association. Florence, Italy. pp. 161-164.
Cite this article
Li,S. (2025). The Production and Perception of Japanese Accent by Native Mandarin Speakers: A Study of Three-Mora Word Sequences Containing Devoiced Vowels. Communications in Humanities Research,60,27-35.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).