Research Article
Open access
Published on 24 April 2025
Download pdf
Export citation

Exploring the Motherhood Penalty in China: A Scoping Review of Key Manifestations and Influencing Factors

Jiayi Lin *,1,
  • 1 International School, Jinan University, Guangzhou, China

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2025.22408

Abstract

This scoping review explores the phenomenon of the "motherhood penalty" in China, a growing issue within the global gender equality discourse. The motherhood penalty refers to the wage and career disadvantages that women experience in the labor market due to their roles as mothers. Despite global research on this topic, limited studies have examined the specific manifestations and influencing factors of the motherhood penalty in China. This review aims to fill this gap by synthesizing 24 empirical studies published between 2013 and 2024, primarily utilizing quantitative methods. The review follows Arksey and O'Malley's five-step framework to analyze the studies. The review identifies four main manifestations of the motherhood penalty in China: lower income, labor force participation and career interruptions, and restricted career development. Moreover, it examines key factors that contribute to these penalties, including family structure, education, workplace sector, intergenerational support, gender norms, and policy. The study provides a comprehensive overview of the literature on the motherhood penalty in China, highlighting the need for future research and policy intervention to address the issue.

Keywords

motherhood penalty, Chinese women, wage gap, gender equality, family role

[1]. Budig, M. J., & England, P. (2001). The wage penalty for motherhood. American sociological review, 66(2), 204-225.

[2]. de Linde Leonard, M., & Stanley, T. D. (2020). The wages of mothers’labor: A meta regression analysis. Journal of Marriage and Family, 82(5), 1534-1552.

[3]. Shen, C. (2022). Widening inequality: The evolution of the motherhood penalty in China (1989-2015). Chinese Journal of Sociology, 8(4), 499-533.

[4]. Ji, Y., Wu, X., Sun, S., & He, G. (2017). Unequal care, unequal work: Toward a more comprehensive understanding of gender inequality in post-reform urban China. Sex roles, 77, 765-778.

[5]. Burgess, N. The motherhood penalty: How gender and parental status influence judgements of job-related competence and organizational commitment. Semin. Res. Pap. Ser. 2013, 32, 1-11.

[6]. Yu, J., & Xie, Y. (2018). Motherhood penalties and living arrangements in China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 80(5), 1067-1086.

[7]. Mincer, J., & Polachek, S. (1974). Family investments in human capital: Earnings of women. Journal of political Economy, 82(2, Part 2), S76-S108.

[8]. Becker, G. S. (1993). A treatise on the family: Enlarged edition. Harvard university press.

[9]. He, J.H and Jiang,Y.P., (2008). An analysis of China’s childcare policy and current situation from the perspective of supporting women and balancing family and work. Studies in Preschool Education (in Chinese ) 8: 3-7.

[10]. Jia, N., & Dong, X. Y. (2013). Economic transition and the motherhood wage penalty in urban China: Investigation using panel data. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 37(4), 819-843.

[11]. Mak, G. C. (2013). Women, education, and development in Asia: Cross-national perspectives. Routledge.

[12]. Zhang, M., Wang, Y., & Hou, L. (2024). Gender norms and the child penalty in China. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 221, 277-291.

[13]. Arksey, H., & O'Malley, L. (2005). Scoping studies: towards a methodological framework. International journal of social research methodology, 8(1), 19-32.

[14]. Tricco, A. C., Lillie, E., Zarin, W., O'Brien, K. K., Colquhoun, H., Levac, D., ... & Straus, S. E. (2018). PRISMA extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR): checklist and explanation. Annals of internal medicine, 169(7), 467-473.

[15]. Meng, L., Zhang, Y., & Zou, B. (2023). The motherhood penalty in China: Magnitudes, trends, and the role of grandparenting. Journal of Comparative Economics, 51(1), 105-132.

[16]. Glauber, R. (2008). Race and gender in families and at work: The fatherhood wage premium. Gender & Society, 22(1), 8-30.

[17]. Xu, Q. (2023). From fatherhood premium to motherhood penalty: trends in the fertility effects on men's and women's wage in China (1989-2015). The Journal of Chinese Sociology, 10(1), 20.

[18]. Ma, X. (2022). Parenthood and the gender wage gap in urban China. Journal of Asian Economics, 80, 101479.

[19]. Gao, K., & Tian, Z. (2023). The Effect of Motherhood on Wages: are women’s wage penalties due to lack of career aspirations?. Applied Economics, 55(54), 6410-6426.

[20]. Juhua, Y. (2019). “Double penalty of gender and motherhood” and female labor force participation. Population Research, 43(1), 36.

[21]. Du, S. (2023). Childbearing Risk, Job Sectors, and the Motherhood Wage Penalty. Population Research and Policy Review, 42(2), 21.

[22]. Chen, Q., Li, Y., & Yan, M. (2024). Fertility and childcare: The wage penalty for female migrant workers' children accompanying them-An analysis based on core family samples. Journal of China University of Labor Relations, 01, 111-124. (Original work published in Chinese)

[23]. Zhao, M., & Hannum, E. (2019). Stark choices: Work-family tradeoffs among migrant women and men in urban China. Chinese Sociological Review, 51(4), 365-396.

[24]. Fan, Y., & Yuchen, H. (2022). Motherhood Penalty on Chinese Women in Labor Market. Population Research, 46(5), 63.

[25]. Zhuang, Y. X., & Fen, Z. X. (2022). The effects of fertility events on women’s and men’s attainment of occupational status-empirical research from CHNS 1993-2015 follow-up survey. Population Journal, 44(5), 1-20.

[26]. Zhao, M. (2018). From motherhood premium to motherhood penalty? Heterogeneous effects of motherhood stages on women’s economic outcomes in urban China. Population Research and Policy Review, 37(6), 967-1002.

[27]. Hu, R., & Gu, J. (2023). Motherhood, Family Patronage and Women’s Employment. Sociological Review (03), 131-153.

[28]. Yu, H., Cao, J., & Kang, S. (2023). Fertility cost, grandparental childcare, and female employment. Empirical Economics, 64(3), 1067-1104.

[29]. Zhang, X. X., & Wang, J. (2022). Why do multi-child mothers suffer from employment exclusion? Analysis based on Chinese women’s evidence. Gender in Management: An International Journal, 37(7), 858-874.

[30]. Xue, J. (2022). Analyze the Difference in the Motherhood Wage Penalty of Multi - child Birth among Urban and Rural Women. Population & Development (06), 59-68.

[31]. Chen, Y., & Wang, Z. (2024). The dilemma between fertility and work: How did the Universal Two-Child policy affect Chinese women’s labor income? PloS one, 19(8), e0308709.

[32]. Cheng, C., & Zhou, Y. (2024). Educational assortative mating and motherhood penalty in China. Research in Social Stratification and Mobility, 89, 100873.

[33]. Liu, Y. (2024). “ Motherhood Punishment” or “ Fatherhood Premium” : Gender Difference in the Impact of Two-Children Policy on the Labor Market. Journal of Sichuan University (Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition) (06), 56-69+208-209.

[34]. ZHENG, Q., QIU, Z., & YANG, W. (2024). The shifting motherhood penalty and fatherhood premium in China's gig economy: Impact of parental status on income changes. International Labour Review, 163(2), 173-197.

[35]. Logan, J. R., & Bian, F. (1999). Family values and coresidence with married children in urban China. Social Forces, 77(4), 1253-1282.

[36]. Zuo, J. (2009). Rethinking family patriarchy and women's positions in presocialist China. Journal of Marriage and Family, 71(3), 542-557.

Cite this article

Lin,J. (2025). Exploring the Motherhood Penalty in China: A Scoping Review of Key Manifestations and Influencing Factors. Communications in Humanities Research,60,36-44.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development

Conference website: https://2025.icllcd.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-993-9(Print) / 978-1-83558-994-6(Online)
Conference date: 12 May 2025
Editor:Rick Arrowood
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.60
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).