Download pdf
The Role of Social Media in Prejudice—Public Attitudes Towards China under the Visa-Free Transit Policy
- 1 Department of Integrated Human Sciences, Tohoku University, Sendai, Japan
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
This study investigates the evolution of public attitudes toward China in the post-COVID-19 pandemic period, specifically before and after the implementation of China’s Visa-Free Transit Policy. Therefore, this paper collected and analyzed 31,395 comments from the #China Travel and #ChinaVlog on YouTube, spanning from May 5, 2023, to the present, regarding the top ten most viewed videos. According to the indirect intergroup contact theory, topic modelling and sentiment analysis utilizing MDCOR and SENA permit the examination of the major topics and emotional attitudes expressed by individuals in their comments on #China Travel and #ChinaVlog videos across different periods. The results of this research suggested that individuals’ perceptions of China have experienced a significant positive shift after implementing the visa-free policy; however, negative topics and sentiments still endure. The knowledge generated in this study may assist in identifying the prevailing perceptions held by foreign netizens regarding China in the present era. Consequently, it also facilitates an evaluation of the impact of the Visa-Free Transit Policy.
Keywords
social media, indirect intergroup contact, prejudice
[1]. National Bureau of Statistics of China, (2021). the Seventh National Population Census (NO.8). https://www.gov.cn/xinwen/2021-05/11/content_5605792.htm.
[2]. Ahmed, S., Chen, V.H.H., Chib, A. (2021) Xenophobia in the Time of a Pandemic: Social Media Use, Stereotypes, and Prejudice against Immigrants during the COVID-19 Crisis. International Journal of Public Opinion Research, 33(3):637–53.
[3]. Li, X., English, A.S., Kulich, S.J. (2021) Anger among Chinese Migrants amid COVID-19 Discrimination: The Role of Host News Coverage, Cultural Distance, and National Identity. PLoS ONE, 16(11):e0259866.
[4]. Lu, R., Sheng, S.Y. (2022) How Racial Animus Forms and Spreads: Evidence from the Coronavirus Pandemic. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 200:82–98.
[5]. United Nations, (2023). WHO chief declares end to COVID-19 as a global health emergency. https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/05/1136367.
[6]. Ministry of Foreign Affairs of China, (2023). Foreign Ministry Spokesperson Wang Wenbin’s Regular Press Conference on March 14, 2023. https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/eng/xw/fyrbt/lxjzh/202405/t20240530_11347482.html.
[7]. National Immigration Administration of China, (2023). Visa-Free Transit Policies. https://en.nia.gov.cn/n147418/n147463/c156070/content.html.
[8]. National Immigration Administration of China, (2024). Over 141 Million Exit-Entry Travelers Recorded in China in Q1 2024. https://en.nia.gov.cn/n147413/c160791/content.html.
[9]. Global Times, (2024). China’s relaxed entry rules bring inbound tourism boom, inspire more overseas visitors to explore a real China in person. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202404/1311452.shtml.
[10]. Pettigrew, T.F. (1998) Intergroup Contact Theory. Annual Review of Psychology, 49:65–85.
[11]. Williams, R.M.Jr. (1947) The Reduction of Intergroup Tensions: A Survey of Research on Problems of Ethnic, Racial, and Religious Group Relations. Social Science Research Council, New York.
[12]. Allport, G.W. (1954) The Nature of Prejudice. Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading, MA.
[13]. Pettigrew, T.F., Tropp, L.R. (2006) A Meta-Analytic Test of Intergroup Contact Theory. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 90(5):751–83.
[14]. McLaren, L.M. (2003) Anti-Immigrant Prejudice in Europe: Contact, Threat Perception, and Preferences for the Exclusion of Migrants. Social Forces, 81(3):909–36.
[15]. Dovidio, J.F., Eller, A., Hewstone, M. (2011) Improving Intergroup Relations through Direct, Extended and Other Forms of Indirect Contact. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 14(2):147–60.
[16]. Amichai-Hamburger, Y., McKenna, K.Y.A. (2006) The Contact Hypothesis Reconsidered: Interacting via the Internet. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 11(3):825–43.
[17]. White, F.A., Harvey, L.J., Abu-Rayya, H. (2015) Improving Intergroup Relations in the Internet Age: A Critical Review. Review of General Psychology, 19(2):129–39.
[18]. Nagayoshi, K. (2016) Research on xenophobia in Japan: What are the remained tasks for the future research. The annual reports of Graduate School of Arts and Letters, Tohoku University, 66:164–143.
[19]. Ahmed, S., Jaidka, k., Chen, V.H.H., Cai, M., Chen, A., Emes, C.S., Yu, V., Chib, A. (2024) Social Media and Anti-Immigrant Prejudice: A Multi-Method Analysis of the Role of Social Media Use, Threat Perceptions, and Cognitive Ability. Frontiers in Psychology, 15:1280366.
[20]. Theocharis, Y., Barberá, P., Fazekas, Z., Popa, S.A., Parnet, O. (2016) A bad workman blames his tweets: the consequences of citizens' uncivil twitter use when interacting with party candidates. Journal of Communications, 66(6): 1007–1031.
[21]. Oz, M., Zheng, P., Chen, G.M. (2018) Twitter versus Facebook: comparing incivility, impoliteness, and deliberative attributes. New Media & Society, 20(9): 3400–3419.
[22]. Thelwall, M. (2018) Social Media Analytics for YouTube Comments: Potential and Limitations. International Journal of Social Research Methodology, 21(3):303–16.
[23]. González Canché, M.S. (2023) Machine Driven Classification of Open-Ended Responses (MDCOR): An Analytic Framework and No-Code, Free Software Application to Classify Longitudinal and Cross-Sectional Text Responses in Survey and Social Media Research. Expert Systems with Applications, 215:119265.
[24]. Blumer, H. (1958) Race Prejudice as a Sense of Group Position. Pacific Sociological Review, 1(1):3–7.
[25]. Haubert, J., Fussell, E. (2006) Explaining pro-immigrant sentiment in the U.S.: Social class, cosmopolitanism, and perceptions of immigrants. International Migration Review, 40(3): 489–507.
[26]. Escandell, X., Ceobanu, A.M. (2009) When contact with immigrants matters: Threat, interethnic attitudes and foreigner exclusionism in Spain’s comunidades autónomas. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 32(1): 44–69.
[27]. Schlueter, E., Scheepers, P. (2010) The relationship between outgroup size and anti-outgroup attitudes: A theoretical synthesis and empirical test of group threat- and Intergroup Contact theory. Social Science Research, 39(2): 285–295.
[28]. Cea D’Ancona, M.Á. (2018) What determines the rejection of immigrants through an integrative model. Social Science Research, 74: 1–15.
Cite this article
Liu,Z. (2025). The Role of Social Media in Prejudice—Public Attitudes Towards China under the Visa-Free Transit Policy. Communications in Humanities Research,68,8-17.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of 3rd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).