An Analysis of the Relationship Between Moral, Educational and Symbolic Values and Their Validity for the Definition of Art

Yilin Han

doi:10.54254/2753-7064/2025.23199

Research Article

Open access

Published on 23 May 2025

Download pdf

Han,Y. (2025). An Analysis of the Relationship Between Moral, Educational and Symbolic Values and Their Validity for the Definition of Art. Communications in Humanities Research,69,48-53.

Export citation

An Analysis of the Relationship Between Moral, Educational and Symbolic Values and Their Validity for the Definition of Art

Yilin Han *^,1,

¹ Foshan EtonHouse International School

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/2025.23199

Abstract

Defining art through artistic values remains a controversial issue in the field of art, with a myriad of artistic values such as aesthetic, historical and emotional values defining works of art. Likewise, it is a challenging task to clearly explain the relationship between these artistic values and to systematically sort out the logical relationships between them to assess their order more effectively. The main question of the research will be interconnected with the definitions of the various values provided in the article and identify some of the links between them. This paper analyzes the relationship between moral, educational and symbolic values and their validity for the definition of art. By analyzing a range of extreme and moderate examples presented by scholars, the study aims to distill the most balanced conclusions and compare them to popular theoretical perspectives. Ultimately, through logical reasoning, the study identifies moral value as a central factor influencing aesthetic value. This value not only plays a key role in the formation of aesthetic perceptions, but also exhibits a complex interrelationship with cognitive values.

Keywords

Art, Moral value, Educational value, Symbolic Value

View pdf

References

[1]. Kieran, M. (2006). Art, morality and ethics: On the (im) moral character of art works and inter‐relations to artistic value. Philosophy Compass, 1(2), 129-143.

[2]. Bayer, T. I. (2006). Art as symbolic form: Cassirer on the educational value of art. Journal of aesthetic education, 40(4), 51-64.

[3]. Drummond, H. (2024). The value of art. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

[4]. Peek, E. (2004). Ethical Criticism of Art. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

[5]. Kazmierczak, P., & Rzegocka, J. (Eds.). (2018). Moral Upbringing Through the Arts and Literature. Cambridge Scholars Publishing.

[6]. Baccarini, E., & Urban, M. C. (2013). The moral and cognitive value of art. Etica e Politica/Ethics and Politics, 15(1), 474-505.

[7]. Gracyk, T. (2003). Hume’s aesthetics.

[8]. Cao, Y. L. (2022). An exploration of the relationship between artistic value and moral value. Literature and Art Weekly, (06), 52-54.

[9]. Naar, H. (2013). Art and emotion. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

[10]. Habermas, J. (2001). The liberating power of symbols: Ernst Cassirer’s humanistic legacy and the Warburg Library. The Liberating Power of Symbols: Philosophical Essays, 1-29.

[11]. Adajian, T. (2007). The definition of art. Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.

[12]. Yu, T. (2019). Research on the artistic value of modern commercial photography based on symbolic semantics (Master's thesis, Dalian Polytechnic University)

Cite this article

Han,Y. (2025). An Analysis of the Relationship Between Moral, Educational and Symbolic Values and Their Validity for the Definition of Art. Communications in Humanities Research,69,48-53.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 4th International Conference on Literature, Language, and Culture Development

Conference website: https://www.icllcd.org/

ISBN：978-1-80590-133-4(Print) / 978-1-80590-134-1(Online)

Conference date: 12 May 2025

Editor：Rick Arrowood

Series: Communications in Humanities Research

Volume number: Vol.69

ISSN：2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).