Download pdf
An Ecofeminist Analysis of Nature Imagery in Sylvia Plath’s Ariel
- 1 University College London
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Sylvia Plath’s Ariel, characterized by dark themes, idiosyncratic imagery, and raw emotional intensity, holds an enduring fascination for readers and critics alike. While much scholarship has examined this collection through a psychoanalytic or biographical lens, this research seeks to uncover an underexplored dimension of Ariel — its ecofeminist undertones. The abundant nature imagery provides a particularly rich source for the investigation of her pre-ecofeminist consciousness. This research adopts a mixed-methods design that combines a corpus-based approach with an in-depth analysis of representative imagery. Excel-based calculation results show that the relatively large presence of nature imagery infuses Ariel with a riveting, dreamy atmosphere. The textual analysis further reveals that Plath’s subtle interweaving of the female experience and the natural world resonates with ecofeminist notions of patriarchal oppression and mutual liberation. By unearthing the ecofeminist dimensions of Ariel, this research aims to provide fresh insights into this masterpiece while shedding light on the richness and complexity of Plath’s thematic concerns and poetic expression.
Keywords
Sylvia Plath, nature imagery, ecofeminist analysis
[1]. Agarwal, S. (2003). Sylvia Plath. Northern Book Centre.
[2]. Rietz, J. (2007). The Father as Muse in Sylvia Plath’s Poetry. Women’s Studies, 36(6), 417–430. https://doi.org/10.1080/00497870701493369
[3]. Clark, H. L. (2005). Tracking the Thought-Fox: Sylvia Plath’s Revision of Ted Hughes. Journal of Modern Literature, 28(2), 100–112. https://doi.org/10.1353/jml.2005.0025
[4]. Mitchell, P. (2011). Sylvia Plath. Universitat de València.
[5]. Crowther, G., & Steinberg, P. K. (2017). These Ghostly Archives. Fonthill Media.
[6]. Gifford, T. (1995). Green Voices. Manchester University Press.
[7]. Brain, T. (2014). The Other Sylvia Plath. Routledge.
[8]. Diamond, Irene, and Gloria Feman Orenstein, eds. (1990). “Introduction.” In Reweaving the Wounds: The Emergence of Ecofeminism, ix–xv. San Francisco: Sierra Club Books.
[9]. Grisafi, P. (2022). Breaking down Plath. Jossey-Bass.
[10]. Plath, S., Hughes, T., & Mccullough, F. (1998). The journals of Sylvia Plath. Anchor Books.
[11]. Gruen, Lori. (1993). Dismantling Oppression: An Analysis of the Connection Between Women and Animals. In Gaard, Greta (Eds.), Ecofeminism: women, animals, nature (p.60-90). Temple University Press.
[12]. Epstein, A. (2022). The Cambridge Introduction to American Poetry Since 1945. Cambridge University Press.
[13]. Dickie, M. (1993). Seeing is Re-Seeing: Sylvia Plath and Elizabeth Bishop. American Literature, 65(1), 131. https://doi.org/10.2307/2928083
[14]. Frank, L. I. (2007). Representations of Gender and Identity in the Writing of Sylvia (Doctoral dissertation, University of Canterbury).
[15]. Eckersley, R. (1992). Environmentalism and political theory: toward an ecocentric approach. Routledge.
[16]. Mies, Maria and Shiva, Vandana. (2010). Ecofeminism. Jaipur: Rawat Publications.
[17]. Tamás, D. (2021). Plath’s Bee Poems: Flying, Freedom, and Fertility in Witch Imagery. Plath Profiles: An Interdisciplinary Journal for Sylvia Plath Studies, 13(1).
Cite this article
Jiang,Z. (2023). An Ecofeminist Analysis of Nature Imagery in Sylvia Plath’s Ariel. Communications in Humanities Research,18,22-28.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).