Download pdf
The Language Origin of the Thinking Differences Between Chinese and English
- 1 University of Chinese Academy and Social Sciences
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Language is not merely a tool for communication; it is intricately intertwined with thinking and culture, perpetually evolving under their profound influence. Linguists widely acknowledge that language acts as a reflection of people’s worldview, unveiling diverse modes of thinking, cultural values, and perspectives. The objective of this paper is to delve into the disparities between the English and Chinese languages, shedding light on how these linguistic characteristics engender four fundamental thinking distinctions: imaginal thinking versus logical thinking, linear thinking versus curved thinking, holistic thinking versus individual thinking, and subjective thinking versus objective thinking. By exploring these disparities, a deeper understanding of the intricate relationship between language and cognition can be gained. This exploration helps to comprehend how language not only shapes perception of the world but also influences thought processes and cultural perspectives. This research contributes to the broader field of linguistics and provides valuable insights into cross-cultural communication and understanding.
Keywords
language differences, Chinese, English, thinking
[1]. Le Guoan(1984), A Study on the Relationship between Language and Thinking in Western Psychology .J. Applied Psychology ,2.
[2]. Snith, S. M.,Brown, H. O. (1947), The lack of cerebral effects of d-tubocurarine. J. Anesthesiology.8: 1-14.doi:10.1097/00000542-194701000-00001.
[3]. Anderson, J. R.(1980), Cognitive Psychology and Its Implications. San Francisco: W. H. Freeman. IBSN: 978-1429219488.
[4]. Ji Yuhua, Xu Qichao. (2003). Re-discussing the Sapir-Whorf Hypothesis - A Review of Foreign Intercultural Communication Textbooks on Linguistic Relativism .J. Foreign Languages and Literature. 4:60-61. https://core.ac.uk/download/41347589.pdf
[5]. Iannucci, D. E., Dodd, D. H.,(1962) The Development of Some Aspects of Quantifier Negation in Children .J. Stanford Child Language Research Forum. https://eric.ed.gov/?q=pick+AND+rate&pg=3&id=ED196297
[6]. Piaget. The Development of Logical Thinking from Childhood to Adolescence. New York: Basic Books. http://dx.doi.org/10.1037/10034-000
[7]. Sinclair, H.,(1976). Developmental Psycholinguistics, Springer, Berlin, Heidelberg. ISBN-13:978-1475706093
[8]. Zhu Manshu, (1982), Studies on Children’s Language Development. East China Normal University Press. https://books.google.com.tw/books/about/儿童语言发展研究.html?id=IpnSAAAAMAAJ&redir_esc=y
[9]. Chomsky, (1972), Language and Mind .Enlarged edition. https://books.google.com.tw/books/about/Language_and_Mind.html?id=QvZrAAAAIAAJ&redir_esc=y
[10]. Fodor, J.(1987) Why There Still Has to Be a Language of Thought. MA: MIT Press.23-24. https://link.springer.com/chapter/10.1007/978-94-009-1181-9_2
[11]. Zhang X., (1999) The Differences between Chinese and English Thinking and Their Manifestations in Language .J. Foreign Languages. 6:1-5. http://doi.org/ 10.3968/j.ccc.1923670020090501.006.
[12]. Yuan M., (2010) The Manifestation of English-Chinese Thinking Differences and Their Influence on English-Chinese Translation .J. Journal of Shanghai Business School. 11, 6: 89-92. http://doi.org/ 10.3968/j.hess.1927024020130501.1007.
Cite this article
Wang,X. (2023). The Language Origin of the Thinking Differences Between Chinese and English. Communications in Humanities Research,18,35-41.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).