Research Article
Open access
Published on 7 December 2023
Download pdf
Shen,Y. (2023). Decoding Marilyn Monroe’s Iconic Sex Symbolism: Exploring the Driving Forces. Communications in Humanities Research,19,245-249.
Export citation

Decoding Marilyn Monroe’s Iconic Sex Symbolism: Exploring the Driving Forces

Yitong Shen *,1,
  • 1 University of California Irvine

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/19/20231252

Abstract

Marilyn Monroe, a famous Hollywood star known as her own “sex symbol”, epitomized the ideal feminine image, especially in postwar America. Discussions about Marilyn Monroe commonly revolve around the male gaze, but frequently ignore the analysis of women’s impressions and opinions of Marilyn Monroe. This research acknowledges the impression of Marilyn Monroe under the male gaze and explores the underlying reasons. Additionally, it analyzes the phenomenon of Marilyn Monroe being recognized and admired by women. The primary focus is on the factors that formed Marilyn Monroe’s sex symbol and the driving forces behind it. This article incorporates a wide range of sources, including but not limited to publications, videos, artwork, and peer-review articles. The findings of this research demonstrate that Marilyn Monroe is not exclusively an object of the male gaze; she is also regarded as an ideal image by female spectators. This phenomenon can be attributed to postwar consumerism ideology and prevailing gender stereotypes. This article offers a relatively new perspective that challenges conventional stereotypes of Marilyn Monroe’s image.

Keywords

Marilyn Monroe, postwar, sex symbol, spectatorship, male gaze

[1]. Elaine, T., (1988), Homeward Bound: American Families in the Cold War Era. New York: University of California Press.

[2]. Meyerowitz, J.J. (1945-1960), Not June Cleaver: Women and Gender in Postwar America. Philadelphia: Temple University Press.

[3]. Thomas Jr, R.M., “Coya Knutson, 82, Legislator; Husband Sought Her Defeat,” The New York Times, October 12, 1996, 52.

[4]. Szymkowska, B.J., (2022), “Marilyn Monroe’s on-Screen Spectrum of Femininity: Types and Nature of Her Movie Characters”. DOI: https://doi.org/10.12797/adamericam.23.2022.23.06.

[5]. Oliver, K., (2017), “The Male Gaze Is More Relevant, and More Dangerous, than Ever.” New Review of Film and Television Studies 15(4), 451-455. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/17400309.2017.1377937.

[6]. Richard, D., (2003), “Heavenly Bodies: Film Stars and Society”2nd Edition, England; New York, Routledge.

[7]. Hertel, H., Neff, D., “From the Archives: Marilyn Monroe Dies; Pills Blamed,” Los Angeles Times, August 6, 1962.

[8]. Mac, K.C., (1982), “Feminism, Marxism, Method, and the State: An Agenda for Theory”. Feminist Theory 7(3), 515-54.

[9]. Stacey, J., (1993), Star Gazing: Hollywood Cinema and Female Spectatorship. England and New York: Routledge.

[10]. Mailer, N. & Eve, A., (1974), Marilyn: A Biography: Pictures by the World’s Foremost Photographers. London: Cornet.

[11]. Mulvey, L., (1999), Visual Pleasure and Narrative Cinema. England and Oxford: Oxford University Press.

[12]. Doane, M.A., (1981), Caught and Rebecca: The Inscription of Femininity as Absence. 1st Edition, England and New York: Routledge.

Cite this article

Shen,Y. (2023). Decoding Marilyn Monroe’s Iconic Sex Symbolism: Exploring the Driving Forces. Communications in Humanities Research,19,245-249.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies

Conference website: https://www.icihcs.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-181-0(Print) / 978-1-83558-182-7(Online)
Conference date: 15 November 2023
Editor:Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.19
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).