Research Article
Open access
Published on 20 December 2023
Download pdf
Zhang,H. (2023). Study on the Economic and Social Impacts of Using Mega-events for Urban Regeneration. Communications in Humanities Research,23,163-169.
Export citation

Study on the Economic and Social Impacts of Using Mega-events for Urban Regeneration

Haoyue Zhang *,1,
  • 1 University College London

* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.

https://doi.org/10.54254/2753-7064/23/20230894

Abstract

The article focuses on the significant economic and social impacts that large-scale events such as the Olympic Games have on the host city. They involve large financial investments, affect millions of people and can strategically transform cities. While these events often improve physical infrastructure, they can also exacerbate inequality and displacement. Disadvantaged communities are often forced to relocate to make way for urban redevelopment projects associated with large-scale activities. Employment and income inequalities may also emerge, with employment opportunities benefiting mainly the middle and upper classes. Legacies such as infrastructure improvements are often unevenly distributed, further marginalising low-income groups. They may also lead to suburbanisation and higher costs of living, resulting in the displacement of residents and the exclusion of disadvantaged groups. In addition, mega-events can place a huge financial burden on taxpayers and are prone to corruption. In short, the neoliberal framework behind mega-events can contribute to the economic, social and geographical polarisation of urban areas.

Keywords

mega-event, urban economic urban regeneration

[1]. Stewart, A. and Rayner, S. (2016) ‘Planning mega-event legacies: uncomfortable knowledge for host cities’, Planning perspectives, 31(2), pp.157-179.

[2]. Minnaert, L. (2012) An Olympic legacy for all? The non-infrastructural outcomes of the Olympic Games for socially excluded groups (Atlanta 1996–Beijing 2008)’, Tourism management, 33(2), pp.361-370.

[3]. Pereira, R.H. (2018) ‘Transport legacy of mega-events and the redistribution of accessibility to urban destinations’, Cities, 81, pp.45-60.

[4]. Hiller, H.H. (2013) ‘Post-event outcomes and the post-modern turn: The Olympics and urban transformations. In The impact and evaluation of major sporting events (pp. 5-20). Routledge.

[5]. Matheson, V.A., Schwab, D. and Koval, P. (2018) Corruption in the bidding, construction and organisation of mega-events: An analysis of the Olympics and World Cup (pp. 257-278). Springer International Publishing.

[6]. Jago, L., Dwyer, L., Lipman, G., van Lill, D. and Vorster, S. (2010) ‘Optimising the potential of mega‐events: an overview’, International Journal of Event and Festival Management, 1(3), pp.220-237.

[7]. Degen, M. and García, M. (2012) ‘The transformation of the ‘Barcelona model’: an analysis of culture, urban regeneration and governance’, International journal of urban and regional research, 36(5), pp.1022-1038.

[8]. Gold, J.R. and Gold, M.M. (2008) ‘Olympic cities: regeneration, city rebranding and changing urban agendas’, Geography compass, 2(1), pp.300-318.

[9]. Pereira, R.H. (2020) ‘Transport legacy of mega-events and inequalities in access to opportunities in Rio de Janeiro. In Evaluating the Local Impacts of the Rio Olympics (pp. 151-174). Routledge.

[10]. Rocha, C.M. and Xiao, Z. (2022) ‘Sport mega-events and displacement of host community residents: a systematic review’, Frontiers in Sports and Active Living, 3, p.805567.

[11]. Kennelly, J. and Watt, P. (2012) ‘Seeing Olympic effects through the eyes of marginally housed youth: changing places and the gentrification of East London’, Visual studies, 27(2), pp.151-160.

[12]. Clark, J., Kearns, A. and Cleland, C. (2016) ‘Spatial scale, time and process in mega-events: The complexity of host community perspectives on neighborhood change’, Cities, 53, pp.87-97.

[13]. Porter, L., Jaconelli, M., Cheyne, J., Eby, D. and Wagenaar, H. (2009) ‘Planning Displacement: The Real Legacy of Major Sporting Events “Just a person in a wee flat”: Being Displaced by the Commonwealth Games in Glasgow’s East End Olympian Masterplanning in London Closing Ceremonies: How Law, Policy and the Winter Olympics are Displacing an Inconveniently Located Low-Income Community in Vancouver Commentary: Recovering Public Ethos: Critical Analysis for Policy and Planning’, Planning Theory & Practice, 10(3), pp.395-418.

[14]. Mair, J., Chien, P.M., Kelly, S.J. and Derrington, S. (2023) ‘Social impacts of mega-events: A systematic narrative review and research agenda’, Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 31(2), pp.538-560.

[15]. Aaron Richmond, M. and Garmany, J., 2016. ‘Post‐Third‐World City’or Neoliberal ‘City of Exception’? Rio de Janeiro in the Olympic Era. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 40(3), pp.621-639.

[16]. Sánchez, F. and Broudehoux, A.M., (2013) ‘Mega-events and urban regeneration in Rio de Janeiro: planning in a state of emergency’, International Journal of Urban Sustainable Development, 5(2), pp.132-153.

[17]. Malfas, M., Theodoraki, E. and Houlihan, B. (2004) Impacts of the Olympic Games as mega-events. In Proceedings of the Institution of Civil Engineers-Municipal Engineer (Vol. 157, No. 3, pp. 209-220). Thomas Telford Ltd.

[18]. Baade, R.A. and Matheson, V.A., 2016. Going for the gold: The economics of the Olympics. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 30(2), pp.201-218.

[19]. Stewart, A. and Rayner, S., 2016. Planning mega-event legacies: uncomfortable knowledge for host cities. Planning perspectives, 31(2), pp.157-179.

[20]. Zheng, S. and Kahn, M.E. (2013) ‘Does government investment in local public goods spur gentrification? Evidence from Beijing’, Real Estate Economics, 41(1), pp.1-28.

[21]. Horne, J. (2007) ‘The four ‘knowns’ of sports mega‐events’, Leisure studies, 26(1), pp.81-96.

[22]. Flyvbjerg, B. and Stewart, A., 2012. Olympic proportions: Cost and cost overrun at the Olympics 1960-2012.

[23]. Müller, M. (2015) ‘The mega-event syndrome: Why so much goes wrong in mega-event planning and what to do about it’, Journal of the American Planning Association, 81(1), pp.6-17.

[24]. Nunkoo, R., Ribeiro, M.A., Sunnassee, V. and Gursoy, D. (2018) ‘Public trust in mega event planning institutions: The role of knowledge, transparency and corruption’, Tourism management, 66, pp.155-166.

[25]. Silk, M. (2014) ‘Neoliberalism and sports mega-events. Leveraging legacies from sports mega-events: Concepts and cases, ‘pp.50-60.

[26]. Ribeiro, L.C.D.Q. and Santos Junior, O.A.D. (2017) ‘Neoliberalization and mega-events: The transition of Rio de Janeiro’s hybrid urban order’, Journal of Urban Affairs, 39(7), pp.909-923.

[27]. Smith, S. (2016) ‘Mega-Events and the Neoliberal Production of Space in Rio de Janeiro’, Inquiries Journal/Student Pulse, 8. Available at: http://www.inquiriesjournal.com/a?id=1381 (Accessed: 20 Apr 2023)

Cite this article

Zhang,H. (2023). Study on the Economic and Social Impacts of Using Mega-events for Urban Regeneration. Communications in Humanities Research,23,163-169.

Data availability

The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.

Disclaimer/Publisher's Note

The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.

About volume

Volume title: Proceedings of the International Conference on Global Politics and Socio-Humanities

Conference website: https://www.icgpsh.org/
ISBN:978-1-83558-241-1(Print) / 978-1-83558-242-8(Online)
Conference date: 13 October 2023
Editor:Enrique Mallen, Javier Cifuentes-Faura
Series: Communications in Humanities Research
Volume number: Vol.23
ISSN:2753-7064(Print) / 2753-7072(Online)

© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See Open access policy for details).