Download pdf
Technological Dystopia: Hindered Democratization of Technology in Margaret Atwood’s The Heart Goes Last
- 1 Southeast University
* Author to whom correspondence should be addressed.
Abstract
Margaret Atwood constructs a chaotic and disorderly dystopian society in The Heart Goes Last, where the technology is turned into a tool for manipulation, exploitation, and objectification of people. This article attempts to analyze the undemocratic use of technology depicted in the Positron project and the obstacles it poses to the development of technological democracy from the perspective of Andrew Feenberg’s critical theory of technology. The article analyzes the undemocratic technology in the book from both the physical and mental aspects, arguing that it strengthens control and surveillance over citizens’ bodies and manipulates their mental world, severely violating citizens’ human rights. Atwood portrays the social problems resulting from the obstacles to democratization of technology in the book, revealing that undemocratic use of technology brings not well-being but deeper disasters. This rings an alarm bell in the context of rapid scientific and technological development, prompting people to reflect on how to better use technology for the benefit of humanity and promote democratization of technology.
Keywords
Margaret Atwood, The Heart Goes Last, Andrew Feenberg, Democratization of technology
[1]. Jiao, J. (2021). A Study on Dystopian Writing in The Heart Goes Last from the Perspective of Disciplinary Power. Dalian University of Foreign Languages.
[2]. Hao, J. (2023). “Interpretation of Utopian Society in The Heart Goes Last.” Journal of Heihe University, 14, 120-122.
[3]. Yuan, X. (2016). “The Prison Images in The Heart Goes Last.” Journal of Hunan University of Science and Technology(Social Science Edition). 19, 44-48.
[4]. Yuan, X. (2016). “Gender Dilemma in The Heart Goes Last.” New Perspectives on World Literature. 3, 56-63.
[5]. Xiao, S., Jiang, L. (2017). “Adherence and Breakthrough - On Margaret Atwood's View on Female in The Heart Goes Last”. Journal of Nanjing University of Aeronautics and Astronautics(Social Sciences), 19, 76-80+84.
[6]. Reese, E. (2020). Attractive Oblivions: Identity, Queer Theory, and Heterotopias in Ari Aster's Midsommar and Margaret Atwood's the Heart Goes Last. Youngstown State University.
[7]. Barbara, M. (2019). “Margaret Atwood’s The Heart goes Last: Panopticism, Discipline, Society, and Utopia.” Metacritic Journal for Comparative Studies and Theory, 5, 79-90.
[8]. Monika, K. (2019). Dystopic Reconfigurations of Corporate America: Margaret Atwood’s “The Heart Goes Last”. Journal STUDIA UNIVERSITATIS BABES-BOLYAI PHILOLOGIA, 64, 255-264.
[9]. Howells, C. (2017). “True Trash: Genre Fiction Revisited In Margaret Atwood’s Stone Mattress, The Heart Goes Last, And Hag-Seed.” Contemporary Women’s Writing, 11, 297-315.
[10]. Feenberg, A. (1991). Critical Theory of Technology. Oxford University Press.
[11]. Feenberg, A. (1995). Alternative Modernity. University of California Press.
[12]. Atwood, M. (2015). The Heart Goes Last. Bloomsbury Publishing Plc.
Cite this article
Minge,Z. (2024). Technological Dystopia: Hindered Democratization of Technology in Margaret Atwood’s The Heart Goes Last. Communications in Humanities Research,27,44-49.
Data availability
The datasets used and/or analyzed during the current study will be available from the authors upon reasonable request.
Disclaimer/Publisher's Note
The statements, opinions and data contained in all publications are solely those of the individual author(s) and contributor(s) and not of EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s). EWA Publishing and/or the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to people or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content.
About volume
Volume title: Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Interdisciplinary Humanities and Communication Studies
© 2024 by the author(s). Licensee EWA Publishing, Oxford, UK. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and
conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license. Authors who
publish this series agree to the following terms:
1. Authors retain copyright and grant the series right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons
Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work's authorship and initial publication in this
series.
2. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the series's published
version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial
publication in this series.
3. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and
during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work (See
Open access policy for details).